SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 36

Ministry of Trade with the Mission to Ensure Economic Independence in Early Turkish Republic Period (05.03.1924- 21.01.1928)

Erken Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Döneminde İktisadi Bağımsızlığı Sağlama Misyonuyla Ticaret Vekâleti (05.03.1924- 21.01.1928)1

Ayşegül SAYLAM
Pages
19–46
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the study, the emergence of ministries in Turkey was explained by taking advantage of the institutional theory literature and then the emergence, institutional activities, mission, institutional logic and organization of the Ministry of Trade, were examined in a theoretical way

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Mechanisms within the state that are the reflections of centralization and modernization in the Ottoman State, became more distinct with the establishment of the ministries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to achieve this goal, the Ministry of Trade which is one of the primary unit of the central government in the field of industry and trade had served between the years of 19241928 in young Turkish Republic period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the study, the emergence of ministries in Turkey was explained by taking advantage of the institutional theory literature and then the emergence, institutional activities, mission, institutional logic and organization of the Ministry of Trade, were examined in a theoretical way
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Mechanisms within the state that are the reflections of centralization and modernization in the Ottoman State, became more distinct with the establishment of the ministries. The Turkish Republic has inherited this institutionalized form of organization, which has a high legitimacy both exterior and interior. When the Republic of Turkey was established, great importance was given to ensuring economic independence in order to guarantee political independence. In order to achieve this goal, the Ministry of Trade which is one of the primary unit of the central government in the field of industry and trade had served between the years of 19241928 in young Turkish Republic period. In the study, the emergence of ministries in Turkey was explained by taking advantage of the institutional theory literature and then the emergence, institutional activities, mission, institutional logic and organization of the Ministry of Trade, were examined in a theoretical way

Özet

Osmanlı Devleti'nde merkezileşmenin ve modernleşmenin yansıması olan devlet içerisindeki mekanizmalar, nezaretlerin kurulması ile belirgin duruma gelmiştir. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti de dışarda ve içeride meşruiyeti yüksek, kurumsallaşmış bu örgütlenme biçimini miras olarak devralmıştır. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti kurulduğunda siyasi bağımsızlığı teminat altına almak için iktisadi bağımsızlığın sağlanmasına büyük önem verilmiştir. Bu amacı sağlamak için de genç Cumhuriyet'e 1924-1928 yılları arasında merkezi yönetimin en üst birimlerinden olan sanayi ve ticaret alanındaki bakanlıklardan Ticaret Vekâleti hizmet vermiştir. Bu kapsamda çalışmada, kurumsal kuram yazınından da yararlanılarak Türkiye'de bakanlıkların ortaya çıkışı açıklanmış, ardından Ticaret Vekâlet'inin ortaya çıkışı, kurumsal faaliyetleri, misyonu, kurumsal mantığı ve teşkilatı teorik bir şekilde irdelenmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

SAYLAM, A. (2022). Ministry of Trade with the Mission to Ensure Economic Independence in Early Turkish Republic Period (05.03.1924- 21.01.1928). Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 36, 19–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/433103

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Açıkgöz, Ö. (2008) Osmanlı Modernleşmesi: İktisadi- Siyasi Dinamikler ve Kırılmalar, Ankara,
  2. Lotus Yayınevi.
  3. Altun, Ş. (2008)
  4. Atatürk, İnönü, Bayar’ın İktisat Kavgası, Hayal Et Kitapevi, İstanbul.
  5. Aydemir, S. Ş. (1931)
  6. Cihan İktisadiyatında Türkiye, Milli İktisat ve Tasarruf Cemiyeti, Ankara.
  7. Barley, R. B. ve Tolbert, B. S. (1997) Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution, Organization Studies, 18(1), 93- 117. Battılana, J. (2006) Agency and Institutions: The Enabling Role of Individuals’ Social Position, Organization, 13(5), 653- 676. Beckert, J. (2010) Institutional Isomorphism Revisited: Convergence and Divergence in Institutional Change, Sociological Theory, 28(2), 150- 166. Boratav, K. (2003)
  8. Türkiye İktisat Tarihi, İmge Kitabevi,
  9. Ankara.
  10. Chrıstıensen, T., Lagreıd, S., Roness, S. G. ve Rovık, K. A. (2007) Organization Theory and the Public Sector: Instrument, Culture and Myth, Routledge, New York. Çavdar, T. (1992) Türkiye’de Liberalizm (1860- 1990),
  11. İmge Yayınevi,
  12. Ankara.
  13. Dacın, T. N., Goodsteın, J. ve Scott, W. R. (2002) Institutional Theory and Institutional Change, The Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 43- 56. Dimaggıo, S. J. ve Powell, W. W. (1983) The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields, American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
  14. Erkan, H. (2008) Cumhuriyetin Kuruluşundan Bugüne Türkiye Ekonomisinde Temel Dönüşümler- Cumhuriyet Öncesi ve Sonrası Türk Ekonomisi, http://kisi.deu.edu.tr/husnu.erkan/cumhuriyet.html, erişim 01.03.2016,
  15. Eroğlu, H. (1981)
  16. Atatürk ve Devletçilik, Olgaç Matbaası, Ankara.
  17. Eroğlu, N. (2010) Atatürk Dönemi Para Politikaları (1923- 1938), Marmara Üniversitesi İ. İ. B. F. Dergisi, 28(1). 23- 36. Frıedland, R. ve Alford, R. R. (1991), Bringing Society back in: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions, W. W. Powell ve S. J. DiMaggio (der), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis içinde, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 232-66.
  18. Gawer, A. ve Phıllıps, N. (2013) Institutional Work as Logics Shift: The Case of Intel’s Transformation to Platform Leader, Organization Studies, 34 (8), 1035- 1071. Goodman, R. ve Jınks, D. (2003) Toward an Institutional Theory of Sovereignty, Standford Law Review, 55(5), 1749- 1788. Gözler, K. (2007)
  19. Devletin Genel Teorisi, Ekin Kitabevi,
  20. Bursa. Günday, M. (2011)
  21. İdare Hukuku, İmaj Yayınları,
  22. Ankara.
  23. Gürbüz, C. (2009)
  24. Atatürk Ekonomisi ve Beş Destan Adam, Asya