SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

The Effect of Technological and Scientific Knowledge on Economic Growth in Turkey (1980 - 2015)

Teknolojik ve Bilimsel Bilginin Türkiye'de Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkisi (1980 - 2015)

Furkan BÖRÜ
Kemal Dinçer DİNGEÇ
Dündar Murat DEMİRÖZ
Pages
111–128
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Second scientific papers of Turkey do not impact the productive sectorsof Turkish economy directly

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, we analyze the relationships among science, technology, andeconomic growth in Turkey for the period 1980 - 2015.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results obtained from thefitted models reveal that there is no significant statistical evidence showing a strongrelation between science, technology, and economic growth.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Second scientific papers of Turkey do not impact the productive sectorsof Turkish economy directly
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, we analyze the relationships among science, technology, andeconomic growth in Turkey for the period 1980 - 2015. We fitted linear regressionand ARDL models by using scientific articles and patents as representatives for thescientific and technological outputs, respectively. The results obtained from thefitted models reveal that there is no significant statistical evidence showing a strongrelation between science, technology, and economic growth. There are two possibleinterpretations of the results. First, the ties between university and industry are weakin Turkey. Second scientific papers of Turkey do not impact the productive sectorsof Turkish economy directly

Özet

Bu çalışma, Türkiye'de 1980 - 2015 döneminde bilim, teknoloji ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişkileri analiz etmektedir. Bilimsel yayınlar ve patent verileri sırasıyla bilimsel ve teknolojik çıktıları temsil etmektedir. Çalışmada doğrusal regresyon ve ARDL modelleri kullanılmıştır. Uygulanan modellerden elde edilen sonuçlar, bilim, teknoloji ve ekonomik büyüme arasında güçlü bir ilişki olduğunu gösteren önemli bir istatistiksel kanıt olmadığını ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına bağlı olarak, iki temel çıkarıma ulaşmak mümkün olabilmektedir. Birincisi, Türkiye'de üniversite ile sanayi arasında bulunan bağlar zayıftır. İkincisi ise, bilimsel makaleler, Türkiye ekonomisinin üretken sektörlerini doğrudan etkilememektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BÖRÜ, F., DİNGEÇ, K. D., DEMİRÖZ, D. M. (2022). The Effect of Technological and Scientific Knowledge on Economic Growth in Turkey (1980 - 2015). Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 111–128. https://ajindex.com/articles/433095

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Åslund, A. (2013). "Why Growth in Emerging Economies is Likely to Fall". Working Paper, Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC. Barbi, F. C. (2016). "ARDL: Auto Regressive Distributed Lag time series model" R package version 0.0.6. Bernardes, A. T. and Albuquerque, E. D. M. (2003). "Cross-over, Thresholds, and Interactions Between Science and Technology: Lessons for Less-Developed Countries". Research Policy, 32(5): 865- 885. Castellacci, F. (2008). "Technology Clubs, Technology Gaps and Growth Trajectories". Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 19(4): 301- 314. Castellacci, F. and Natera, J. M. (2013). "The Dynamics of National Innovation Systems: A Panel Cointegration Analysis of the Coevolution Between Innovative Capability and Absorptive Capacity". Research Policy, 42(3): 579-594.
  2. Chaves, C. V. and Moro, S. (2007). "Investigating the Interaction and Mutual Dependence Between Science and Technology". Research Policy, 36(8): 1204-1220.
  3. Dickey, D. A., and Fuller, W. A. (1979). "Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root". Econometrica, 49(4): 1057-1072.
  4. Dickey, D. A., and Fuller, W. A. (1981). "Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root". Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366): 427-431.
  5. Dosi, G., Llerena, P., and Labini, M. S. (2006). "The Relationships Between Science, Technologies and Their Industrial Exploitation: An illustration through the Myths and Realities of the So-Called ‘European Paradox". Research Policy, 35(10): 1450-1464.
  6. Enders, W. (2015). Applied Econometric Time Series. Wiley, United States of America. Fagerberg, J., Srholec, M., and Knell, M. (2007). "The Competitiveness of Nations: Why Some Countries Prosper While Others Fall Behind". World Development, 35(10): 1595-1620.
  7. Fagerberg, J. and Srholec, M. (2008). "National Innovation Systems, Capabilities and Economic Development". Research Policy, 37(9): 1417-1435.
  8. Fagerberg, J. and Srholec, M. (2017). "Capabilities, Economic Development, Sustainability". Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(3): 905-926.
  9. Feenstra, R., Inklaar, R., and Timmer, M. (2015). “The Next Generation of the Penn World Table”. American Economic Review, 105(10): 3150- 3182. Furman, J. and Hayes, R. (2004). "Catching Up or Standing Still?: National Innovative Productivity Among Follower Countries, 1978–1999". Research Policy, 33(9): 1329-1354.
  10. Furman, J., Porter, M. E., and Stern, S. (2002). "The Determinant