SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 34

Freirean Dialogue for Peace Education: A Promising Pedagogy for Grassroots Peace in the Middle East

BARIŞ EĞİTİMİ İÇİN FREİRE DİYALOĞU: ORTA DOĞU'DA KÖKLÜ BARIŞI İÇİN UMUT VEREN BİR PEDAGOJİ

Gülistan GÜRSEL BİLGİN
Pages
84–105
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, Freirean dialogue is proposedas an effective pedagogy in order to eliminate the barriers undermining dialogue between the two groups for agrassroots peace movement.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The relatively few studies focused on the inter-ethnic/inter-religious encounter/dialogue initiativesbetween Israel and Palestine emphasize the failure of these efforts in promoting tolerance and mutual respect.However, with all the tools of the 21st century to change the recurrent history, we have every reason to behopeful for a peaceful future.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, the dialogue encounters in the Israel and Palestine are portrayed as they are operatedby non-governmental organizations, international third-party interventions, and schools.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, Freirean dialogue is proposedas an effective pedagogy in order to eliminate the barriers undermining dialogue between the two groups for agrassroots peace movement.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The relatively few studies focused on the inter-ethnic/inter-religious encounter/dialogue initiativesbetween Israel and Palestine emphasize the failure of these efforts in promoting tolerance and mutual respect.However, with all the tools of the 21st century to change the recurrent history, we have every reason to behopeful for a peaceful future. This paper presents an overview of Arab-Jewish dialogue projects in order toreveal future directions towards achieving critical dialogue as a foundation for peace education from thegrassroots. For this purpose, the dialogue encounters in the Israel and Palestine are portrayed as they are operatedby non-governmental organizations, international third-party interventions, and schools. Next, drawing from anumber of dialogue scholars, the notion of Freirean dialogue is presented. Finally, Freirean dialogue is proposedas an effective pedagogy in order to eliminate the barriers undermining dialogue between the two groups for agrassroots peace movement.

Özet

İsrail ile Filistin arasındaki etnik/dinler arası karşılaşma/diyalog girişimlerine odaklanan nispeten az sayıda çalışma, bu çabaların hoşgörü ve karşılıklı saygıyı teşvik etmedeki başarısızlığını vurgulamaktadır. Bununla birlikte, 21. yüzyılın tarihi değiştirecek tüm araçlarıyla, barışçıl bir gelecek için umutlu olmak için her türlü nedenimiz bulunmaktadır. Bu makale, halkın arasından yeşerecek ve sürdürülebilir barış eğitimi için bir temel olarak eleştirel diyaloğu etkin şekillerde uygulamaya yönelik imkanları ortaya çıkarmak için Arap-Yahudi diyalog projelerine genel bir bakış sunuyor. Bu amaçla İsrail ve Filistin'deki diyalog karşılaşmaları, sivil toplum örgütleri, uluslararası üçüncü taraf müdahaleleri ve okullar tarafından işletildiği şekliyle tartışılmaktadır. Daha sonra, önde gelen diyalog akademisyenlerinin uluslararası alanyazında kabul gören yaklaşımlarından hareketle, Freire diyaloğu kavramı sunulmaktadır. Son olarak, Freire diyaloğu, halkın arasında filizlenecek bir barış hareketi için iki grup arasındaki diyaloğu zayıflatan engelleri ortadan kaldırmak doğrultusunda etkili bir pedagoji olarak önerilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLGİN, G. G. (2022). Freirean Dialogue for Peace Education: A Promising Pedagogy for Grassroots Peace in the Middle East. Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 34, 84–105. https://ajindex.com/articles/433069

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Abu-Nimer, M. (1999)
  2. Dialogue, Conflict Resolution and Change: Arab-Jewish Encounters in Israel. New York: SUNY Press.
  3. Allport, G. W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley. Amir, Y. (1976). Contact Hypothesis in Ethnic Relations” and “The role of intergroup contact in change of prejudice and ethnic relations. In P.A. Katz (Ed.) Towards the Elimination of Racism. New York: Pergamon. Anderson, R., Baxter, L. A., Cissna, K. N. (Eds) (2005). Dialogue: Theorizing Difference in Communication Studies. Sage Publications. Arnett, R. C. (1994). Existential homelessness: A contemporary case for dialogue. In Anderson, R., Cissna, K. N., & Arnett, R. C. (Eds.). The reach of dialogue: Confirmation, voice, and community. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press,
  4. Inc. Bajaj, M. (2008). Critical peace education. In M. Bajaj, (Ed.) Encyclopaedia of peace education. New York: Colombia Teacher's College. Bakhtin, M. (1981).
  5. The Dialogic imagination, C. Emerson & M. Holquist, trans. Austin, TX, University of Texas Press.
  6. Bakhtin, M. (1984a). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics, C. Emerson, ed. & trans. Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press.
  7. Bakhtin, M. (1984b).
  8. Rabelais and his world, H. Iswolsky, trans. Bloomington, IN, Indiana University Press.
  9. Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres & other late essays, V. McGee, trans. Austin, TX, University of Texas Press.
  10. Bakhtin, M. (1990). Art and answerability: early philosophical essays, V. Liapunov & M. Holquist, trans. Austin, TX, University of Texas Press.
  11. Bar-Siman-Tov, I. (2011). The Puzzling Resistance to Judicial Review of the Legislative Process. 91 Boston University Law Review 1915, 1917.
  12. Bar-Tal, D. (2011). Policy for education toward Jewish-Arab partnership: A Case Study. (Presentation for the Annual Convention of the Association for Jewish Studies, Boston, Massachusetts, December 21, 2010); Yoram Harpaz, interview with Daniel Bar-Tal (Hebrew), Hed Ha-Khinukh 4, February 2011, 32-38.
  13. Brewer, M., Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this “We”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71:83-93.
  14. Brown, N. J. (2006). Contesting national identity in Palestinian education. In R. I. Rotberg (Ed.) Israeli and Palestinian narratives of conflict: history's double Helix. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  15. Buber, M. (1958). I and thou. (trans: Gregory Smith, R.). Edinburgh: T & T Clark. Buber, M. (1985). Between man and man. New York: Collier Books. Cissna, K. N. & Anders