Journals / Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 59

Bireysel başarı güdüsü unsurlarının örgütsel yenilikçilik üzerine etkileri: Türk kamu ektöründe bir çalışma

The Impacts of the Elements of Individual Achievement Motive on Organisational Innovativeness: A Study of the Turkish Public Sector

Pages
97–122
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Theoretical and managerial implications of these empirical findings are also discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this paper is to determine the relationship between individual achievement motive and organisational innovativeness.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With this purpose, the data was collected from 839 employees working in different public organisations in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Theoretical and managerial implications of these empirical findings are also discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to determine the relationship between individual achievement motive and organisational innovativeness. This research is developed by using the Achievement Motive Theory. With this purpose, the data was collected from 839 employees working in different public organisations in Turkey. The factors which have been studied in the research are about achievement motive (independence, task related motivation, ambition, and self-confidence) and organisational innovativeness. According to the analysis results, the individual factors which positively affect the organisational innovativeness are ambition and self-confidence. The paper has tried to make clear the relationships between organisational innovativeness and personal characteristics. Theoretical and managerial implications of these empirical findings are also discussed.

Özet

Bu makalenin amacı bireysel başarı güdüsü ile örgütsel yenilikçilik arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemektir.Bu araştırma başarı güdüsü kuramı kullanılarak geliştirilmiştir. Bu amaç ile Türkiyede farklı kamu kurumlarında çalışan 839 işgörenden veriler toplanmıştır. Araştırmada incelenen faktörler başarı güdüsü (baçımsızlık, görev ilintili motivasyon, hırs ve öz güven) ve örgütsel yenilikçiliktir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre örgütsel yenilikçiliçi pozitif olarak etkileyen faktörler hırs ve öz güvendir. Makale bireyin kişisel özellikleri ile örgütsel yenilikçilik arasındaki ilişkileri aydınlıça kavuşturmaya çalışmıştır. Araştırmanın deneye dayalı bulgularının kuramsal ve yönetimsel teklifleri aynı zamanda tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TORLAK, N. G., KAYA, N. (2022). Bireysel başarı güdüsü unsurlarının örgütsel yenilikçilik üzerine etkileri: Türk kamu ektöründe bir çalışma. Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 59, 97–122. https://ajindex.com/articles/431944

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Alberti, Adriana. (2006). Innovations in public administration in the Mediterranean region: Lessons learnt and future prospects, Speech at the Dubai School of Government. www.unpan.org/innovned/Documents/Dubai/Adrianaspeech.pdf [Accessed October 2007
  2. Amabile, T. M. (1996).
  3. Creativity in Context, West View Press,
  4. Boulder, CO: 1-58
  5. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations, Research in Organizational Behaviour, 19: 123-167
  6. Ames, C. (2002). Achievement goals and classroom motivational climate, in A. Leondari and G. Vasilios, Implicit Theories, goal orientations, and perceived competence: impact on students’ achievement behaviour, Psychology in Schools, 39 (3):279-291
  7. Andrew, H. Van de Ven. (1986). "Central Problems in the Management of Innovation," Management Sciences, 32 (5): 590-607
  8. Atkinson, J. W. (1999).
  9. An Introduction to motivation, New York, D.Van Nostrand Company. In: A. Sagie and D. Elizur, Achievement Motive and Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Structural Analysis, Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 20: 375-387
  10. Aycan, Z. (2001). Human Resource Management in Turkey, current issues and future challenges, International Journal of Manpower, 22(3): 252-260
  11. Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R. N., Mendonca, M., Yu, K. Deller, J., Sthal, G., Khurshid, A. (2000). Impact of culture on human resource management practices: A ten-country comparison, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49 (1): 192-220
  12. Basilevsky, A. (1994). Statistical Factor Analysis and Related Methods, Wiley: New York; pp.1- 180 Bigoness W. J., Perreault. W. D. Jr. (1981) A conceptual paradigm and approach for the study of innovators, Academy of Management Journal, 24(1): 68-82
  13. Boer, H., During, W. E. (2001). Innovation. What innovation? A comparison between product, process and organisational innovation. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(1/2/3), 83–107 Borins, S. (2001). Encouraging innovation in the public sector, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3): 10-19
  14. Camelo-Ordaz, C., Hernandez-Lara, A. B., Valle-Cabrera, R. (2005). The Relationship between top management teams and innovative capacity in companies, The Journal of Management Development, 24 (7/8): 683-705
  15. Cardador, M. Thornton, G. C., Schuler, H., Frintrup, A., Fox, S. (2004). Measuring Achievement Motivation: Tests of Equivalency for English, German, and Israeli Versions of the Achievement Motivation Inventory, Personality and Individual Differences, 37: 203-217
  16. Cassidy T., Lynn, R. A.