Journals / Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 63

Jenerik stratejiler veçevresel faktörlerin yenilikçilikçabalarına etkileri

Effects of generıc strategıes and envıronmental condıtıons on ınnovatıon efforts

Pages
1–30
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We achieve four important results based upon the data collected from top managers of 431 firms in Istanbul (Turkey): (1) Market dynamism affects both exploratory and exploitative innovation efforts more than price competition does; (2) The effect of differentiation strategy on exploratory innovation is more influential than that of low cost strategy; (3)Low cost strategy influences exploitative innovation efforts more than differentiation strategy does; (4)Combination strategy increases ambidextrous innovation efforts more than both differentiation and low cost strategies do.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main objective of this study is to clarify the antecedents of ambidextrous innovation efforts, which refers to pursuing exploratory and exploitative innovation efforts simultaneously.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Accordingly, we analyze the effects of environmental conditions, generic strategies and combination strategy (implementing two generic strategies together) on innovation efforts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We achieve four important results based upon the data collected from top managers of 431 firms in Istanbul (Turkey): (1) Market dynamism affects both exploratory and exploitative innovation efforts more than price competition does; (2) The effect of differentiation strategy on exploratory innovation is more influential than that of low cost strategy; (3)Low cost strategy influences exploitative innovation efforts more than differentiation strategy does; (4)Combination strategy increases ambidextrous innovation efforts more than both differentiation and low cost strategies do.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to clarify the antecedents of ambidextrous innovation efforts, which refers to pursuing exploratory and exploitative innovation efforts simultaneously. Although the vital importance of implementing ambidextrous innovation is discussed in recent literature, dynamics of it still need to be studied more deeply. Accordingly, we analyze the effects of environmental conditions, generic strategies and combination strategy (implementing two generic strategies together) on innovation efforts. We achieve four important results based upon the data collected from top managers of 431 firms in Istanbul (Turkey): (1) Market dynamism affects both exploratory and exploitative innovation efforts more than price competition does; (2) The effect of differentiation strategy on exploratory innovation is more influential than that of low cost strategy; (3)Low cost strategy influences exploitative innovation efforts more than differentiation strategy does; (4)Combination strategy increases ambidextrous innovation efforts more than both differentiation and low cost strategies do.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, keşifsel ve fayda artırıcı yenilikçilik çabalarının eş zamanlı yürütüldüğü çift yetenekli yenilikçilik çabalarının öncüllerinin belirlenmesidir. Mevcut literatürde çift yetenekli yenilikçiliğin önemi bazı çalışmalarda tartışılmış olmakla birlikte, halen dinamikleri ile ilgili detaylı araştırmalara ihtiyaç vardır. Bu kapsamda, çalışmamızda çevresel faktörler, jenerik stratejiler ve hibrit stratejinin (farklılaştırma ve düşük maliyet stratejilerinin birlikte yürütülmesi) yenilikçilik çabaları üzerindeki etkileri analiz edilmiştir. İstanbulda faaliyet gösteren 431firmanın üst düzey yetkilileri ile yapılan anketlerdenelde edilen verilerin analiz edilmesi ile dört önemli sonuç elde edilmiştir: (1)Pazar dinamizmi hem keşifsel hem de fayda artırıcı yenilikçilik çabalarını fiyat rekabetinden daha fazla etkiler, (2)Farklılaştırma stratejisinin keşifsel yenilikçilik üzerindeki etkisi düşük maliyet stratejisinin etkisinden fazladır; (3) Düşük maliyet stratejisi fayda artırıcı yenilikçilik çabalarını farklılaştırma stratejisinden daha fazla etkiler; (4) Hibrit strateji çift yetenekli yenilikçilik çabalarını farklılaştırma ve düşük maliyet stratejilerinden daha fazla artırır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAHRALI, İ., ALPKAN, L., AREN, S. (2022). Jenerik stratejiler veçevresel faktörlerin yenilikçilikçabalarına etkileri. Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 63, 1–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/431897

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Acquaah, Mosed and Yasai-Ardekani, Masoud. (2008). Does the Implementation of a Combination Competitive Strategy Yield Incremental Performance Benefits? A New Perspective From a Transition Economy In Sub-Saharan Africa, Journal of Business Research, Vol 61, p 346-354.
  2. Alpkan, Lütfihak, ùanal, Mehmet and Ayden, Yüksel. (2012).
  3. Market Orientation, Ambidexterity and Performance Outcomes. International Conference On Leadership, Technology and Innovation Management, Vol 41, p 461-468.
  4. Auh, Seigyoung and Menguc, Bülent. (2005). Balancing Exploration And Exploitation: The Moderating Role of Competitive Intensity, Journal of Business Research, Vol 58, p 1652-1661.
  5. Chang, Yi-Ying. and Hughes, Mathew. (2012). Drivers of Innovation Ambidexterity In Small- To Medium-Sized Firms, European Management Journal, Vol 30, p 1-17. Do÷an, Türkan. (2008). Effects of Strategy Types and Strategic Management Processes on Firm Performance. Doctoral Thesis, Gebze Institute of Technology. Frambach, Ruud, T., Prabhu, Jaideep and Verhallen, Theo M. M. (2003). The influence of business strategy on new product activity: The role of market orientation, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol 20, p 377-397.
  6. Gupta, Anil, K., Smith, Ken, G. and Shalley, Christina, E. (2006). The Interplay Between Exploration And Exploitation, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 49, Iss 4, p 693-706.
  7. He, Zi-Lin and Poh-Kam Wong, (2004). Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of The Ambidexterity Hypothesis, Organization Science, Vol 15, Iss 4, p 481-494.
  8. Jansen, Justin. P., Van Den Bosch, Frans. A. J. and Volberda, Henk. W. (2005).
  9. Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation And Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents And Environmental Moderators, Management Science, Vol 52, Iss 11, p 1661-1674.
  10. Jansen, Justin. P., Van Den Bosch, Frans. A. J. and Volberda, Henk. W. (2006).
  11. Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation And Ambidexterity: The Impact of Environmental and Organizational Antecedents, Schmalenbach Business Review, 57(October), p 351-363.
  12. Jones, Gareth, R. and Butler, John, E. (1988).
  13. Costs, Revenue And Business-Level Strategy, Academy of Management Review, Vol 13, p 202-213.
  14. Kaya, Nihat, Alpkan, Lütfihak and Aytekin, Mehmet. (2003). Performance Impacts And Moderating Effects of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies (AMTS) On The Business Strategy- Performance Relationship: A Study of Manufacturing Firms In Gaziantep, Bo÷aziçi Journal Review of Social Economic And