Penetran ince bağırsak yaralanmalarında morbiditeye etkili faktörler

Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, we aimed to investigate the effective factors on morbidity due to small intestine penetrating injuries.

📊

Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: Between January 2006 and December 2010, 114 patients who underwent surgery due to penetrating small intestine injuries were retrospectively reviewed.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:The number of blood transfusions was effective in mortality (p

🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey

📍Scope:2006 Verileri

⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to investigate the effective factors on morbidity due to small intestine penetrating injuries. Material and Methods: Between January 2006 and December 2010, 114 patients who underwent surgery due to penetrating small intestine injuries were retrospectively reviewed. Results: The mean age was 32.8±12.3years (15-77), and there were 96 patients, (84.2%) male and 18 (15.8%) female patients. The most common etiologic cause was gun-shot injuries (66.7%). Fifty-one (44.7%) patients had isolated small intestine injuries and 63 (55.3%) had small intestine and additional organ injuries. Colon was the most common additional organ injured (66.7%) Most commonly, 68 (59.7%) patients underwent primary suture. T Postoperative morbidity occurred in 30 patients (25%) and the most common complication was wound infection. The morbidity was significantly higher in the patients with small intestine and additional organ injuries (p=0.006). The morbidity was higher in patients who exhibited signs of peritonitis (p=0.048) and had colonic injuries (p=0.002). The number of blood transfusions was effective in mortality (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada penetran travmaya bağırsak ince bağırsak yaralanmalarında morbidite üzerine etkili faktörlerin araştırılması amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Ocak 2006-Aralık 2010 tarihleri arasında penetran ince bağırsak yaralanmasına bağlı cerrahi uygulanan 114 hasta retrospektif olarak incelendi. Bulgular: Hastaların 96’sı (%84.2) erkek, 18’i (%15.8) kadın idi. Hastaların ortalama yaşları 32.8±12.3 (15-77) yıldı. En sık etiyolojik neden ateşli silah yaralanmasıydı (%66.7). Hastaların 51’inde (%44.7) izole ince bağırsak yaralanması, 63’ünde (%55.3) ince bağırsakla beraber intraabdominal yandaş organ yaralanması mevcuttu. Yandaş organ olarak en sık kolon yaralanmasının (%66.7) ettiği belirlendi. Hastalara en sık olarak 68’ine (%59.7) primer sutür uygulandı. Hastaların 30’unda (%26.3) morbidite gelişti. En sık görülen komplikasyon yara yeri enfeksiyonuydu. Yandaş organ yaralanmalarının eşlik ettiği ince bağırsak yaralanmalarında morbidite anlamlı olarak artmaktaydı (p=0.006). Kolon yaralanması (p=0.002) mevcut olanlar ile peritonit bulguları (p=0.048) nedeniyle opere edilen hastalarda morbidite anlamlı olarak daha yüksekti. Mortalite gelişimi üzerine kan tranfüzyon miktarı etkiliydi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

GİRGİN, S., ÖNDER, A., KAPAN, M., BAŞOL, Ö., GÜL, M., GÜMÜŞ, M., BÖYÜK, A. (2022). Penetran ince bağırsak yaralanmalarında morbiditeye etkili faktörler. Akademik Acil Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 204–207. https://ajindex.com/articles/431689

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

Hackam DJ, Ali J, Jastaniah SS. Effects of other intra-abdominal injuries on the diagnosis, management, and outcome of small bowel trauma. J Trauma 2000
[CrossRef] 2. Uludağ M, Yetkin G, Çitgez B, Yener F, Akgün İ, Çoban A. Effects of additional intra-abdominal organ injuries in patients with penetrating small bowel trauma on morbidity and mortality. Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery. 2009
Kirton OC, O’Neill PA, Kestner M, Tortella BJ. Perioperative antibiotic use in high-risk penetrating hollow viscus injury: a prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-control trial of 24 hours versus 5 days. J Trauma. 2000
[CrossRef] 4. Velmahos GC, Vassiliu P, Demetriades D, Chan LS, Murray J, Salim A et al. Wound management after colon injury: open or closed? A prospective randomized trial. Am Surg 2002
Van Nata TL, Morris JA Jr. Injury scoring and trauma outcomes. In: Mattox KL, Feliciano DV, Moore EE, editors. Trauma. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill
p. 69-78. 6. Bowley DM, Boffard KD: Penetrating trauma of the trunk Unfallchirurg. 2001
[CrossRef] 7. Ekiz F, Yücel T, Yalcin O, Fincan K, Fehmi Küçük HF. The evaluation of delayed repair in small bowel and colonic ruptures in abdominal stab wound injuries. Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery. 1999
Yildirgan MI, Akcay MN, Capan MY, Celebi F, Celik S, Atamanalp SS ve ark. Penetrating gunshot wounds of the abdomen. Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery. 1996
Salim A, Teixeira PGR, Inaba K, Brown C, Browder T, Demetriades D. Analysis of 178 Penetrating Stomach and Small Bowel Injuries. World J Surg. 2008
[CrossRef] 10. Mitra B, Gocentas R, O’Reilly G, Cameron PA, Atkin GC. Management of haemodynamically stable with abdominal stab wounds. Emerg Med Australas.2007
[CrossRef] 11. Oymacı E,Kapkaç M,Uçar Y, Ertan H, Özdedeli E, Tokat Y. The Effects Of Gunshot And Shotgun Wounds To Mortality And Morbidity. Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery. 1997
Van Haarst EP, van Bezooijen BP, Coene PP, Luitse JS. The efficacy of serial physical examination in penetrating abdominal trauma Injury. 1999
[CrossRef] 13. Velmahos GC, Demetriades D, Toutouzas KG, Sarkisyan G, Chan LS, Ishak R, et al. Selective nonoperative management in 1,856 patients with abdominal gunshot wounds: should routine laparotomy tan be the standard of care? Ann Surg.