SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

The Relationship between Transformational and Interactive Leadership and Organizational Identification in National Literature: A Meta-Analysis

Dönüşümcü ve Etkileşimci Liderlik İle Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Arasındaki İlişki: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması

Seval AKSOY KÜRÜ
Pages
678–697
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained, it is understood that the effect size is medium level (ES=0.386, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main purpose of this study is to determine the total effect of individual studies examining the relationship between transformative and interactive leadership and organizational identification in the national literature by meta-analysis method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data from 17 individual studies [transformative leadership (k=11) and interactive leadership (k=6)] (n=4798) were analyzed in the Comprehensive Meta Analysis (CMA) software program.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results obtained, it is understood that the effect size is medium level (ES=0.386, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to determine the total effect of individual studies examining the relationship between transformative and interactive leadership and organizational identification in the national literature by meta-analysis method. For this purpose, postgraduate theses and articles with keywords determined in Council of Higher Education (CoHE) National Thesis Center, Turkish Academic Network and Information Center (Ulakbim), Dergipark and in various international databases were scanned. Data from 17 individual studies [transformative leadership (k=11) and interactive leadership (k=6)] (n=4798) were analyzed in the Comprehensive Meta Analysis (CMA) software program. According to the results obtained, it is understood that the effect size is medium level (ES=0.386, p

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, ulusal yazında dönüşümcü ve etkişleşimci liderlik ile örgütsel özdeşleşmearasındaki ilişkiyi inceleyen bireysel çalışmaların etki büyüklüğünü meta-analiz yöntemiyle belirlemektir. Buamaçla, Yükseköğretim Kurulu (YÖK) Ulusal Tez Merkezi, Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi (Ulakbim),Dergipark ve çeşitli uluslarararası veri tabanlarında ve arama motorlarında belirlenen anahtar kelimelerlelisansüstü tezler ve makaleler taranmıştır. 17 bireysel çalışmadan [Dönüşümcü liderlik (k=11) ve etkileşimciliderlik (k=6)] elde edilen veriler (n=4798), Comprehensive Meta Analysis yazılım programında analizedilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, dönüşümcü liderlik ile örgütsel özdeşleşme arasındaki ilişki için metaanalize dahil edilen 11 çalışmanın rastgele etki büyüklüğüne göre etki büyüklüğünün orta düzeyde (EB=0.386,p

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜRÜ, S. A. (2022). The Relationship between Transformational and Interactive Leadership and Organizational Identification in National Literature: A Meta-Analysis. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 678–697. https://ajindex.com/articles/431283

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Alagöz, M. (2019). Dönüştürücü liderlik anlayışı ile örgütsel sinizm ve örgütsel özdeşleşe ilişkisi: bir araştırma. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Kafkas Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bı̇lı̇mler Enstitüsü, İşletme Anabilim Dalı, Kars. Ashforth, B. E. ve Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
  2. Aşık, Z. ve Özen, M. (2019). Meta-Analiz basamakları ve raporlanması. The Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care (TJFMPC),13(2), 232-240.
  3. Avolio, B., Bass, B.M. ve Jung, D.I. (1999). Re-Examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Journal Of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, pp.441-462.
  4. Avolio, B. J. ve Gibbons, T.C. (1998). Developing transformational leaders: A lifespan approach, İçerisinde J.A. Conger ve R.N. Kanungo (Ed.), Charismatic leadership: The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 276-308.
  5. Bass, B. M. ve Avolio, B. J. (1992). Developing transformational leadership: 1992 and beyond. Journal of European Industrial Training, 14(5), 21-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090599010135122
  6. Bass, B. M., (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational Leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9-32.
  7. Begg, C.B. ve M. Mazumdar, (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50, 1088-1101.
  8. Black, J. S. ve Porter, L. W. (2000) Management: Meeting New Challenges, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey. Bolat, O. İ. (2011). Öz yeterlilik ve lider üye etkileşimi ilişkisi: göze girme davranışları ve güç mesafesi. Ankara:
  9. Detay Yayıncılık. Bottery, M. (2001). Globalisation and the UK competition state: no room for transformational leadership in education, School Leadership and Management, 21(2), 199-218
  10. Bryman, A. (1992). Charisma and leadership in organizations, Sage Publications, London. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: NY: Harper&Row Publishing. Coad, A. F. ve Berry, A. J. (1998). Transformational leadership and learning orientation. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 19(3), 164-172.
  11. Cohen, L., Manion, L., ve Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. *Çeri Booms, M. (2009). An empirical study on transactional, transformational and authentic leaders: exploring the mediating role of “trust in lea