SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ağrı / 2022 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3

Validity and reliability of the full cup test in patients with chronic low back pain

Dolu bardak testinin kronik bel ağrılı hastalarda geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması

Hatice AĞIR
Müyesser ARAS
Esra Dilek KESKİN
Hafsa Feyza ÖZER
Gülten KARACA
Ufuk ERGÜN
Serap YÖRÜBULUT
Journal
Ağrı
Pages
166–173
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

External construct validity of the scale was confirmed with expected correlations with all subgroups of NHP except for social isolation, VAS and ODI (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to determine the validity and reliability of the full cup test (FCT), evaluating the pain severity in patients with chronic low back pain.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 100 patients (70 women and 30 men) aged over 18 years with mechanical low back pain were enrolled in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:External construct validity of the scale was confirmed with expected correlations with all subgroups of NHP except for social isolation, VAS and ODI (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to determine the validity and reliability of the full cup test (FCT), evaluating the pain severity in patients with chronic low back pain. Methods: A total of 100 patients (70 women and 30 men) aged over 18 years with mechanical low back pain were enrolled in the study. Demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. Pain severity was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) and FCT, the functional state was assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the quality of life was assessed using the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). FCT was performed on the 1st day by two independent observers (G1 and G2) and 3 days after the first application, patients were readministered the FCT by G1. Results: The mean age of participants was 56.04±12.33 years and mean body mass index was 27.7±4.3 kg/m². The reliability of the FCT and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was found to be 0.989 for intrarater compliance, ICC was found to be 0.984 for inter-rater compliance, and Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient was α=0.994. External construct validity of the scale was confirmed with expected correlations with all subgroups of NHP except for social isolation, VAS and ODI (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, kronik mekanik bel ağrısı olan hastalarda ağrı düzeylerinin Dolu Bardak Testi ile değerlendirilerek geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışmasını yapmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya kronik bel ağrısı olan 18 yaşın üstündeki 100 hasta (70’i kadın, 30’u erkek) dahil edildi. Hastaların demografik bilgileri ile demografik ve klinik verileri kaydedildi. Hastaların ağrı durumu Görsel Analog Skalası ve Dolu Bardak Testi; fonksiyonel durumu Oswestry Özürlülük İndeksi; yaşam kalitesi ise Nottingham Sağlık Profili ile değerlendirildi. Hastalara ilk gün birbirinden bağımsız iki gözlemci (G1 ve G2) tarafından Dolu Bardak Testi uygulandı. Ayrıca hastalar aynı gün G1 tara- fından Görsel Analog Skalası, Oswestry Özürlülük İndeksi ve Nottingham Sağlık Profili ile değerlendirildi. İlk uygulamadan üç gün sonra hastalara, G1 tarafından Dolu Bardak Testi tekrar uygulandı. Bulgular: Hastaların yaş ortalaması 56,04±12,33 yıl, beden kitle indeksi ortalamaları 27,7±4,3 kg/m² idi. Dolu Bardak Testinin güvenilirlik analiz değerlendirmesinde gözlemci içi uyumu gösteren ICC değeri 0,989, gözlemciler arası uyumu gösteren ICC değeri 0,984 ve Cronbach’s alfa güvenilirlik katsayısı ise α=0,994 olarak bulundu. Ölçek geçerliliği test edildiğinde Dolu Bardak Testinin Görsel Analog Skalası, Oswestry Özürlülük İndeksi ve Nottingham Sağlık Profilinin sosyal izolasyon hariç tüm alt grup- ları ile arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişki tespit edildi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

AĞIR, H., ARAS, M., KESKİN, E. D., ÖZER, H. F., KARACA, G., ERGÜN, U., YÖRÜBULUT, S. (2022). Validity and reliability of the full cup test in patients with chronic low back pain. Ağrı, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3, 166–173. https://ajindex.com/articles/430540

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Loeser JD, Treede RD. The Kyoto protocol of IASP basic pain terminology. Pain 2008;137:473–7
  2. Turk, DC, Melzack R. The measurement of pain and the as- sessment of people experiencing pain. 3rd ed. Handbook of pain assessment; 2011. p.3–16. 3. van Dalen-Kok AH, Achterberg WP, Rijkmans WE, de Vet HC, de Waal MW. Pain assessment in impaired cognition: Ob- server agreement in a long-term care setting in patients with dementia. Pain Manag 2019;9:461–73
  3. Ahluwalia SC, Giannitrapani KF, Dobscha SK, Cromer R, Lo- renz KA. “Sometimes you wonder, is this really true?”: Clini- cian assessment of patients’ subjective experience of pain. J Eval Clin Pract 2020;26:1048–53
  4. Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Bain C, et al. The global burden of low back pain: Estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:968–74
  5. Bagraith KS, Strong J, Meredith PJ, McPhail SM. Rasch anal- ysis supported the construct validity of self-report mea- sures of activity and participation derived from patient ratings of the ICF low back pain core set. J Clin Epidemiol 2017;84:161–72
  6. Chiarotto A, Maxwell LJ, Ostelo RW, Boers M, Tugwell P, Terwee CB. Measurement properties of visual analogue scale, numeric rating scale, and pain severity subscale of the brief pain inventory in patients with low back pain: A systematic review. J Pain 2019;20:245–63
  7. Yu T, Wei Z, Xu T, Gamber M, Han J, Jiang Y, et al. The associ- ation between the socioeconomic status and body pain: A nationwide survey. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99:e19454
  8. Ergün U, Say B, Ozer G, Yildirim O, Kocatürk O, Konar D, et al. Trial of a new pain assessment tool in patients with low education: The full cup test. Int J Clin Pract 2007;61:1692–6
  9. Singh A, Kaur S, Jani M, Soni P, Thakkar P, Gupta S. The dif- ference in pain and swelling experienced by the patient undergoing bilateral mandibular impaction surgery: Dif - ference between grafted and non grafted side. Int J Dent Med Res 2014;1:46–50
  10. Lim K, Salahudin M, Hariri F. Evaluating full cup study, nu- meric pain rating scale, and visual analogue scale in assess- ing pain after surgical removal of lower third molar. Ann Dent UM 2018;24:16–23
  11. Al-Samman AA, Al-Nuaime OS, Othman HA. Validity and reliability of full cup test in pain evaluation after dental surgery: A comparison with four pain-rating scales in a sample of Iraqi patients. J Oral Dent Res 2016;3:2–7
  12. Odai ED, Ehizele AO, Enabulele JE. Assessment of p