SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade

Ölçek ekonomileri, ürün farklılaştırma ve ticaret yapısı

Paul KRUGMAN
Pages
211–227
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition to that, attempted model resulted that some general acceptances must be abandoned.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Standard theories within international economy does not appear to be adequate in explaining the extensive trade among the industrial countries or two-way exchanges of differentiated products.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main focus of this paper is to design a model that can explain some issues that have not been explained by standard models.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition to that, attempted model resulted that some general acceptances must be abandoned.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Standard theories within international economy does not appear to be adequate in explaining the extensive trade among the industrial countries or two-way exchanges of differentiated products. The main focus of this paper is to design a model that can explain some issues that have not been explained by standard models. As a result of this model it was seen that countries export what they have home markets for and there is some justification for this idea. In addition to that, attempted model resulted that some general acceptances must be abandoned.

Özet

Uluslararası iktisat teorisi içinde yer alan standart teoriler ülkeler arasındaki yoğun ticareti ve farklılaştırılmış ürünlerin çift yönlü ticaretini açıklamakta yeterli gözükmemektedir. Bu makalenin konusu, konvansiyonel standart modellerle açıklanamayan bazı hususları açıklayabilecek bir model tasarımıdır. Model sonucunda ülkelerin iç piyasaları için ne üretiyorlarsa bunu ihraç ettiklerini ve bunun da nedenleri olduğunu görülmektedir. Buna ek olarak, yapılan model çalışması sonucunda bazı genel kabullerin de terkedilmesi gerektiği görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

KRUGMAN, P. (2022). scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 211–227. https://ajindex.com/articles/430479

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. BALASSA, Bela. (1967), Trade Liberalization Among Industrial Countries, New York. CORDEN, W. M.(1970), "A Note on Economies of Scale, the Size of the Domestic Market and the Pattern of Trade," in I. A. McDougall and R. H. Snape, eds. Studies in International Economics, Amsterdam. DIXIT, A. and STIGLITZ, J. (1977), "Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity," Amer. Econ. Rev., 06, 67, 297-308.
  2. GRUBEL, H. (1967), "Intra-Industry Specialization and the Pattern of Trade." Can. J. Econ., 08, 33, 374-388.
  3. GRUBEL, H. (1970), "The Theory of Intra-Industry Trade," in I. A. McDougall and R. H Snape, eds. Studies in International Economics, Amsterdam 1970.
  4. HUFBAUER, G. and CHILAS, J. (1974), "Specialization by Industrial Countries: Extent and Consequences," in Herbert Giersch, ed., The International Division of Labor, Tübingen. KRAVIS, I. (1971), "The Current Case for Import Limitations," in United States Economic Policy in an Interdependent World, Commission on International Trade and Investment Policy, Washington. KRUGMAN, P. (1979), "Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade," J. Int. Econ., 11, 9, 469-80.
  5. LINDER, Steffan. (1961),
  6. An Essay on Trade and Transformation, New York.