SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

The chinese room argument against the strong artificial ıntellingence

Güçlü yapay zekaya karşı çin odası argümanı

Fatma DORE
Pages
23–38
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The final part of the article focuses on the ethical implications of Searle’s position on computaer consciousness.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article is on the American philosopher John Rogers Searle’s famous thought experiment known as the Chinese Room Argument.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It was developed by Searle to be a proof that computers, which function using artificial intelligence, do not actually consciously think.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The final part of the article focuses on the ethical implications of Searle’s position on computaer consciousness.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article is on the American philosopher John Rogers Searle’s famous thought experiment known as the Chinese Room Argument. It was developed by Searle to be a proof that computers, which function using artificial intelligence, do not actually consciously think. Before examing the Chinese Room Argument in some detail, this article first looks at Alan Turing’s Turing Test which Searle developed his thought experiment in opposition to. The final part of the article focuses on the ethical implications of Searle’s position on computaer consciousness.

Özet

Bu makalede, Amerikalı filozof John Rogers Searle’ün Çin Odası Argümanı olarak bilinen ünlü düşünce deneyi incelenmiştir. Argüman, Searle tarafından, işlevi; yapay zeka kullanmaya dayalı bilgisayarların, aslında bilinçli olarak düşünmediklerinin bir kanıtı olmak üzere geliştirilmiştir. Makalede, Çin Odası Argümanı’nın detaylarına girilmeden önce, Searle’ün muhalif olarak düşünce deneyini geliştirdiği Alan Turing’in Turing Testi’ne bakılmıştır. Makalenin son bölümü, Searle’ün görüşünün doğurabileceği etik etkiler temelinde, bilgisayar bilinçliliği üzerinde odaklanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DORE, F. (2022). The chinese room argument against the strong artificial ıntellingence. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 23–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/430471

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. BBC NEWS, (2003), “Kasparov Fights Computer to Draw”, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3263031.stm (12 November. CONNOR, Steve. (2008), “Computers 'to match human brains by 2030'”, http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-andtech/ news/computers-to match-human-brains-by-2030-782978.html (16 February 2008).
  2. DAMPER, Robert I. (2004), “The Chinese Room Argument--Dead but Not yet Buried”. Journal of Consciousness Studies 11 (5-6):159-169, http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/9561 (28 Jan 2009).
  3. DESCARTES, Rene. (1968), Discourse on Method and The Meditations (Translated with an Introduction by F. E Sutcliffe), Penguin Books. FREEMAN, Walter J. and Christine A. SKARDA. (1993), “Mind/Brain Science: Neuroscience on Philosophy of Mind”, (Eds.), Ernest Lepore and Robert Van Gulick, John Searle and His Critics, UK: Blackwell. FITZPATRICK, Michael. “No, Robot: Japan's Elderly Fail to Welcome Their Robot Overlords”, BBC News, Tokyo - February 2011, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12347219 (3 Feb 2011).
  4. GRAYLING, C. (2005),
  5. Descartes, London. HAUSER, Larry. (2005), “Searle’s Chinese Room Argument”, http://host.uniroma3.it/progetti/kant/field/chinesebiblio.html (12 Apr 2001).
  6. MOOR, James H. (1976), “An Analysis of the Turing Test”, Philosophical Studies 30, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing, ss. 249-257.
  7. PEPITONE, Julianne, (2011), “IBM's Jeopardy Supercomputer Beats Humans in Practice Bout”, http://money.cnn.com/2011/01/13/technology/ibm_jeopardy_watson/i ndex.htm (January 14, 2011).
  8. PRADO, C. G. (2006),
  9. Searle and Foucault on Truth, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  10. RAPAPORT, William J. (2003), “How to Pass a Turing Test”, (Ed.) James H. Moor, The Turing Test: The Elusive Standard of Artificial Intelligence, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. SAYGIN, Ayşe Pınar; ÇİÇEKLİ, İlyas ve AKMAN, Varol. (2003), “Turing Test: 50 Years Later”, (Ed.) James H. Moor, The Turing Test: The Elusive Standard of Artificial Intelligence, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. SEARLE, John. (1996),
  11. Akıllar, Beyinler ve Bilim (Çev.) Kemal Bek, İstanbul:
  12. Say Yayınları.
  13. SEARLE, John. (2004), Zihnin Yeniden Keşfi (Çev.) Muhittin Macit, İstanbul:
  14. Litera Yayıncılık. SEARLE, John. (1990), “Is the Brain’s Mind a Computer Program?” Scientific American, 262, no.1, 26-31.
  15. SEARLE, John. (1980),
  16. Minds, Brains, and Programs”, http://cogprints.org/7150/1/10.1.1.83.5248.pdf, ss. 1-19 (19 Aug 2001).
  17. SKIRBEKK, Gunnar and GILJE, Nils. (Eds.), (1971), Antik Yunan’dan Modern Döneme Felsefe Tarihi (Çev.) Emrah Akbaş