Journals / Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR) / 2015 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

CONCEPTUALIZING URBAN EXPLORATION AS BEYOND TOURISM AND AS ANTI-TOURISM

KENTSEL KEŞFİ TURİZMİN ÖTESİNDE VE TURİZM KARŞITI OLARAK KAVRAMSALLAŞTIRMAK

Pages
140–164
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, the paper proposes a model which identifies opportunities for further research beyond the current spectrum of tourism academia.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Urban Exploration (U.E.), the activity of exploring hidden parts of the city, is increasingly discussed in a range of academic papers, yet the aspects of this activity which are associated with travel and consumption have not been explored.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is suggested that U.E. can thus be interpreted as a form of tourism which is outside of accepted norms of behaviour, decision making and typologies and which has significant meaning for future research.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, the paper proposes a model which identifies opportunities for further research beyond the current spectrum of tourism academia.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Urban Exploration (U.E.), the activity of exploring hidden parts of the city, is increasingly discussed in a range of academic papers, yet the aspects of this activity which are associated with travel and consumption have not been explored. However, there have been a number of related calls for research. This paper identifies that U.E. requires greater critical inquiry. It is noted that U.E. draws common themes with heritage tourism, adventure tourism, otherness, authenticity and risk, yet is a contradiction to the homogenised tourist experience. It is suggested that U.E. can thus be interpreted as a form of tourism which is outside of accepted norms of behaviour, decision making and typologies and which has significant meaning for future research. Thus, the paper proposes a model which identifies opportunities for further research beyond the current spectrum of tourism academia.

Özet

Kentin gizli alanlarını keşfetme faaliyeti olan "Kentsel Keşif" (U.E) birçok akademik yayında giderek artan bir şekilde tartışılmaktadır ancak bu faaliyetin seyahat ve tüketimle ilişkili yönleri henüz araştırılmamıştır. Bu bağlamda, konuyla ilgili olarak araştırmanın yapılmasına ilişkin birçok çağrı bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışma "Kentsel Keşif"in daha eleştirel bir sorgulama gerektirdiğini belirtmektedir. "Kentsel Keşif"in miras turizmi, macera turizmi, ötekilik, otantiklik ve risk ile ortak temalar çizdiği kaydedilmiştir ancak bu homojenize turist deneyimi için bir çelişkidir. "Kentsel Keşif" davranış normları, karar verme ve tipolojilerinin dışında turizmin bir formu olarak yorumlanabileceği belirtilmektedir ve gelecek araştırmalar için önemli bir anlama sahiptir. Böylece, bu çalışma turizm akademisinin şimdiki görüntüsünün ötesinde gelecek araştırmalar için fırsatlar belirleyen bir model önermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ROBINSON, P. (2022). CONCEPTUALIZING URBAN EXPLORATION AS BEYOND TOURISM AND AS ANTI-TOURISM. Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR), Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 140–164. https://ajindex.com/articles/429500

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Albers, P. C., & James, W.R. (1988). Travel photography: A methodological approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 15, 134-158.
  2. Arsenault, N. (2003). The growth and potential of experiential and learning travel. Paper presented at TTRA-Canada conference, Saint John, Canada. Avatar, X. (2010). The Urban Exploration Resource. http://www.uer.ca/
  3. Baker, S. M., & Kennedy, P. F. (1994). Death by nostalgia: A diagnosis of context-specific cases. In C. T. Allen & D. R. John (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 21, pp. 169-174).
  4. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research. Bennett, L. (2011). Bunkerology - a case study in the theory and practice of urban exploration. Environment and Planning D: Society and space, 29, 421-434.
  5. Binney, M. (1984). Our Vanishing Heritage. London: Arlington Books. Bonnett, A. (1989). Situationism, geography, and poststructuralism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 7, 131-146.
  6. Boorstin, D. J. (1964). The Image: A Guide to Pseudo-Events in America. New York: Atheneum. Brown, D. (1996). Genuine Fakes. In T. Selwyn (ed.), The Tourist Image: Myths and Myth Making in Tourism (pp. 33-47). Chichester: Wiley. Brown, J. (2003). Online and underground. Retrieved August 1, 2012 from Salon.com, http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2001/01/16/infiltration/.
  7. Bruner, E. M. (1994). Abraham Lincoln as authentic reproduction: A critique of postmodernism. American Anthropologist, 96, 397-415.
  8. Buda, D. M., & McIntosh, A. J. (2013). Dark tourism and voyeurism: Tourist arrested for,spying' in Iran. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 7 (3), 214-226.
  9. Buda, D.M., d'Hautserre, A., & Johnston, L. (2014). Feeling and tourism studies. Annals of Tourism Research, 46, 102-114.
  10. Cahill, L. & McGaugh, J. L. (1998) Mechanism of emotional arousal and lasting declarative memory. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 294-299.
  11. Clemens, P. (2011). Punching Out: One Year in a Closing Auto Plant. New York: Doubleday. Cohen, E. (1996). The Sociology of Tourism: Approaches, Issues and Findings. In S. Apostoolopolous, S. Leivadi, and A. Yiannakis (eds),The Sociology of Tourism: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (pp. 51-74). London: Routledge. Cohen, E. (2002). Authenticity, equity & sustainability in tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 10 (4), 267-276.
  12. Cowie, J., & Heathcott, J. (Eds). (2003). Beyond the Ruins: the Meanings of Deindustrialization. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  13. Craggs, R., Geoghegan, H., & Neate, R. (2013). Arc