Journals / Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR) / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

TOURISM AT RISK: FAILURES AND DICHOTOMIES OF RISK PERCEPTION THEORY IN TOURISM

Pages
167–176
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This piece discusses critically the main limitations of risk perception theory and the rise of a new discipline, post disaster marketing, in view of the caveats and speculative assumption of “the precautionary principle”

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The turn of the century has brought a lot of radical shifts and risks for tourism industry, which ranged from terrorism to lethal virus outbreaks.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Henceforth risk perception theory, which was formulated in psychology, was re-appropriated by policy makers and tourism-related scholars.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This piece discusses critically the main limitations of risk perception theory and the rise of a new discipline, post disaster marketing, in view of the caveats and speculative assumption of “the precautionary principle”
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The turn of the century has brought a lot of radical shifts and risks for tourism industry, which ranged from terrorism to lethal virus outbreaks. Henceforth risk perception theory, which was formulated in psychology, was re-appropriated by policy makers and tourism-related scholars. However, from its inception this conceptual corpus was based on the economic-centred paradigm. This piece discusses critically the main limitations of risk perception theory and the rise of a new discipline, post disaster marketing, in view of the caveats and speculative assumption of “the precautionary principle”

🔖

Cite This Article

KORSTANJE, M. E. (2022). TOURISM AT RISK: FAILURES AND DICHOTOMIES OF RISK PERCEPTION THEORY IN TOURISM. Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR), Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 167–176. https://ajindex.com/articles/429479

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Koc, E. (2010). Services and conflict management: Cultural and European integration perspectives. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34 (1), 88-96.
  2. Koc, E. (2013). Power distance and its implications for upward communication and empowerment: Crisis management and recovery in hospitality services. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24 (19), 3681-3696.
  3. Koc, E., Ulukoy, M., Kilic, R., Yumusak, S., & Bahar, R. (2017). The influence of customer participation on service failure perceptions. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28 (3-4), 390-404.
  4. Sparks, B. (2001). Managing service failure through recovery. In J. Kandampully, C. Mok & B. Sparks (eds.), Service quality management in hospitality, tourism and leisure (pp. 193-219). Haworth Press: Binghampton.