Journals / Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR) / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

SERIOUS LEISURE AND PEOPLE WITH ORTHOPEDIC IMPAIRMENT: BENEFITS AND CONSTRAINTS

ORTOPEDİK ENGELİ BULUNAN BİREYLER VE CİDDİ BOŞ ZAMAN: FAYDALAR VE ENGELLER

Pages
138–166
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the findings, these constraints are explained as psychological factors, family support, level of orthopedic impairment, community awareness and environmental factors, work and income

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There are many people around the world who have different types of disabilities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Understanding their needs is the first step of developing policies to increase their quality of life and satisfaction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the findings, these constraints are explained as psychological factors, family support, level of orthopedic impairment, community awareness and environmental factors, work and income
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There are many people around the world who have different types of disabilities. Understanding their needs is the first step of developing policies to increase their quality of life and satisfaction. Leisure is an essential need of disabled people and it plays an important role in disabled people’s lives. The purpose of this study is to gain a deep understanding on the serious leisure activities of people with orthopedic impairment, and also both benefits and constraints involved with serious leisure. Therefore, semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 17 people who have orthopedic impairment. The data collected through interviews was analyzed by using a coding process. Findings of the study indicate that people with orthopedic impairment pursue many leisure activities. The research revealed that the participants were aware of significant individual and community benefits of serious leisure activities. Although the benefits of leisure for private and community life are obvious for people with orthopedic impairment, it is not always easy for them to pursue serious leisure activities. Disabled people recognize that there are many constraints involved with serious leisure. Based on the findings, these constraints are explained as psychological factors, family support, level of orthopedic impairment, community awareness and environmental factors, work and income

Özet

Dünyada farklı türde engeli olan birçok birey bulunmaktadır. Engelli bireylerin hayat kalitesi ve memnuniyeti artırmak için ilk adım, onların ihtiyaçlarını kavramaktır. Boş zaman engelli bireylerin hayatında önemli bir role sahiptir. Bu çalışmanın amacı ortopedik eneli bulunan bireyin ciddi boş zaman faaliyetlerine yönelik derinlemesine bir kavrayış geliştirmek, böylece ciddi boş zaman faaliyetlerinin faydaları ve faaliyetlere katılmada karşılaşılan engelleri belirlemektir. Bu amaçla ortopedik engeli bulunan 17 katılımcıyla yarı yapılandırılmış mülakatlar gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ulaşılan veri kodlama yardımıyla analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma bulguları ortopedik engeli bulunan katılımcıların bişrçok ciddi boş zaman aktivitesine katıldığını göstermektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

AKSATAN, M., SEL, Z. G. (2022). SERIOUS LEISURE AND PEOPLE WITH ORTHOPEDIC IMPAIRMENT: BENEFITS AND CONSTRAINTS. Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR), Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 138–166. https://ajindex.com/articles/429476

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aitchison, C. (2003). From leisure and disability to disability leisure: developing data, definitions and discourses. Disability & Society, 18 (7), 955-969.
  2. Aitchison, C. (2009). Exclusive discourses: leisure studies and disability. Leisure Studies, 28 (4), 375-386.
  3. Akyıldız Munusturlar, M. (2016). Examination of the serious leisure, leisure satisfaction and quality of life of people with physical disabilities. Sport Science, 11 (9), 23-38.
  4. Albrecht, G. L., & Devlieger, P. J. (1999). The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odd. Social Sciences & Medicine, 48, 977-988.
  5. Alwis, Y., & Horridge, K. (2016). Safeguarding disabled children and young people, Paediatrics and Child Health, 26 (11), 488-492.
  6. Badia, M., Orgaz, B. M., Verdugo, M. A., Ullán, A. M., & Martínez, M. M. (2011). Personal factors and perceived barriers to participation in leisure activities for young and adults with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32 (6), 2055-2063.
  7. Bedini, L. A. (2000). Just sit down so we can talk: Perceived stigma and the pursuit of community recreation for people with disabilities. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 34, 55-68.
  8. Bergier, B., Bergier, J., & Kubińska, Z. (2010). Environmental determinants of participation in tourism and recreation of people with varying degrees of disability. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 73 (17-18), 1134-1140.
  9. Bergier, B., Kubińska, Z., & Bergier, J. (2013). Interests and needs for participation in tourism among disabled from eastern regions of Poland. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, 20 (4), 807–811.
  10. Burcu, E. (2006). Özürlülük kimliği ve etiketlemenin kişisel ve sosyal söylemleri [Personal and social discourses of disability identity and labelling]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 23 (2), 61-83.
  11. Burns, N., Paterson, K., & Watson, N. (2009). An inclusive outdoors? Disabled people’s experiences of countryside leisure services. Leisure Studies, 28 (4), 403-417.
  12. Burns, N., Watson, N., & Paterson, K. (2013). Risky bodies in risky spaces: disabled people’s pursuit of outdoor leisure. Disability & Society, 28 (8), 1059-1073.
  13. Burns, R. C., & Graefe, A. R. (2007). Constraints to outdoor recreation: Exploring the effects of disabilities on perceptions and participation. Journal of Leisure Research, 39 (1), 156-181.
  14. Çağlar, S. (2012). Engellilerin erişebilirlik hakkı ve Türkiye’de erişebilirlikleri [Right of accessibility for persons with disabilit