Journals / Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR) / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Cultural Heritage Management in Turkey and Egypt: A Comparative Study

Pages
68–91
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore; it will emphasize thesignificance of sustainability practices in managing world heritage sites.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Recently, there are various threats encounteringthe cultural heritage worldwide.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since the1970s, the UNESCO started to issue many guidelines and charters related to themanagement and conservation of the cultural heritage.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore; it will emphasize thesignificance of sustainability practices in managing world heritage sites.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Recently, there are various threats encounteringthe cultural heritage worldwide. Indeed, these threats make conservation andmanagement of cultural heritage a complex process to deal with. Since the1970s, the UNESCO started to issue many guidelines and charters related to themanagement and conservation of the cultural heritage. Meanwhile, the CulturalHeritage Management (CHM) including sustainability has become a significantconcept especially in the European countries. Turkey and Egypt are famous fortheir diversified cultural and natural heritage attractions which give anopportunity for both countries to be appealing tourist destinationsNevertheless, cultural heritage of Turkey and Egypt suffers from several majorproblems at present. All of these require a selective policy, urgentconservation, constant monitoring, protection, and maintenance. This paper aimsto examine and compare cultural heritage management in both countries accordingto specific criteria which will evaluate the current situation of the culturalheritage management in Turkey and Egypt from different aspects (legalframework, institutional/administrational framework, resources, and currentchallenges). Also, this paper shows how the cultural heritage management hasbeen developed in both countries. Generally, it highlights the increasingimportance of cultural heritage management. Furthermore; it will emphasize thesignificance of sustainability practices in managing world heritage sites.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, Y., EL-GAMIL, R. (2022). Cultural Heritage Management in Turkey and Egypt: A Comparative Study. Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR), Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 68–91. https://ajindex.com/articles/429469

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aas, C., Ladkin, A., & Fletcher, J. (2005). Stakeholder collaboration and heritage management. Annals of Tourism Research, 32 (1), 28–48.
  2. Abada, G. (2008). Public Initiatives vs. Governmental Efforts in the Development of Urban Heritage in Egypt. In F. Hassan, A. Trafford and M. Youssef (Eds.), Cultural Heritage and Development in the Arab World, (pp.89-110).
  3. Alexandria, Egypt: The Bibliotheca Alexandrina. Bandarin, F., & VanOers, R. (2012). The historic urban landscape managing heritage in urban century (First Edition). UK: John Wiley & Sons. Bastemur, C., & Günes, G. (2011). World heritage sites as tourism resources: The case of Safranbolu-Turkey. In J. Matić & C. Wallington, (Eds.), Conference Proceedings, 29th EuroCHRIE Annual Conference, (pp. 103-116),
  4. Dubrovnik, Croatia. Boztaş, F. (2014). Site management plan as global norm for best local practice: Bursa. European Journal of Research on Education, 2, 53-61.
  5. Fredholm, S. (2015). Negotiating a dominant heritage discourse. Sustainable urban planning in Cape Coast, Ghana. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 5 (3), 274-289. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-04-2014-0016
  6. Fuligni, L. (2015). Opening to the private sector: A different perspective in the management of cultural heritage. Unpublished master's thesis, The Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali "Guido Carli", Rome, Italy. Retrieved July 15, 2017, from https://tesi.luiss.it/15155/1/071802.pdf
  7. Fushiya, T. (2013). Archaeological site management and local involvement: A case study from Abu Rawash, Egypt. Journal Conservation and Management of Archeological sites, 12 (4), 324-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/175355213X13789818050224
  8. Gültekin, N. (2012). Cultural heritage management: The case of Historical Peninsula in Istanbul. Gazi University Journal of Science GUJS, 25 (1), 235-243.
  9. Günlü, E., Yağcı, K., & Pırnar, İ. (2009). Preserving cultural heritage and possible impacts on regional development: case of Izmir. International Journal of Emerging and Transition Economies, 2 (2), 213-229. Guzmán, P. C., Roders, A. R., & Colenbrander, B. J. F. (2017). Measuring links between cultural heritage management and sustainable urban development: An overview of global monitoring tools. Cities, 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.005
  10. Hang, P., & Kong, C. (2008). Heritage management and control: The case of Egypt. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 2 (1-2), 105-117. http://dx.doi.org/10