SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR) / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

The Role of Tourism Related Migrations on Sociocultural Change: The Case of Didyma

Arzu TOKER
Nazmi KOZAK
Pages
393–418
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of this study, the dimensions of change were divided into five main categories; deterioration of social values, declination of business ethics, changes in senses of identity and belonging, socio-spatial accumulation and emergence of social hegemony.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Didyma is an area which has been home to immigrants for 100 years and so experienced changes in many aspects.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The development of tourism in Didyma has increased the power of migration to cause change and has turned migration into a self-acting social process.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of this study, the dimensions of change were divided into five main categories; deterioration of social values, declination of business ethics, changes in senses of identity and belonging, socio-spatial accumulation and emergence of social hegemony.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Didyma is an area which has been home to immigrants for 100 years and so experienced changes in many aspects. Immigration towards a region, alone, has the power to cause change. The development of tourism in Didyma has increased the power of migration to cause change and has turned migration into a self-acting social process. Starting from 1924, when first immigrants arrived at Didyma, if we call every movement of migration of a group of individuals with common characteristics a “stratum of migration,” it will be possible to distinguish three main strata; namely, the Balkanization, dam-induced and tourism related migrations. Within this framework, the purpose of this study is to investigate the sociocultural change created by social groups distinguished according to their sociocultural characteristics and reasons for migration related tourism. The data for this study were collected through interviews conducted in person and analyzed in accordance with grounded theory approach. As a result of this study, the dimensions of change were divided into five main categories; deterioration of social values, declination of business ethics, changes in senses of identity and belonging, socio-spatial accumulation and emergence of social hegemony.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOKER, A., KOZAK, N. (2022). The Role of Tourism Related Migrations on Sociocultural Change: The Case of Didyma. Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR), Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 393–418. https://ajindex.com/articles/429438

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akkayan, T. (1979). Göç ve değişim [Migration and change]. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Yayınları, No: 2573. Ap, J. (1992). Residents’ perceptions on tourism impacts. Annals of Tourism Research, 19, 665–690.
  2. Bell, M., & Ward, G. (2000). Comparing temporary mobility with permanent migration. Tourism Geographies, 2(1), 87-107.
  3. Benhabib, S. (2006). Ötekilerin hakları: Yabancılar, yerliler, vatandaşlar. [Rights of others: Aliens, Residents, and Citizens] (Trans. B. Akkıyal). İstanbul:
  4. İletişim Yayınları.
  5. Benson, M., & O’Reilly, K. (2015). From lifestyle migration to lifestyle in migration: Categories, concepts and ways of thinking. Migration Studies, 1-18.
  6. Berkes, F., & Jolly, D. (2002). Adapting to climate change: social-ecological resilience in a Canadian western Arctic community. Conservation ecology, 5(2), 18-34.
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  8. Carter, R. W., & Beeton, R. J. S. (2004). A model of cultural change and tourism. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 9(4), 423-442. (CE) Commission of the European Communities, Directorate General XXIII-Tourism Unit. (1993). Taking Account of Environment in Tourism Development, Brussels. Cohen, E. (1984). The sociology of tourism: Approaches, issues, and findings. Annual Review of Sociology, 10(1), 373-392.
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Creswell, J. W. (2016). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni [Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches] (Trans. Ed. M. Bütün and S. B. Demir). Ankara:
  10. Siyasal Kitabevi.
  11. Deniz, A. (2012). Rusya’dan Antalya’ya ulusaşırı göç ve bu göçün mekânsal sonuçları [Transnational migration from Russia to Antalya and socio-spatial consequences of this migration]. Unpublished master’s thesis, Ankara University, Ankara.
  12. Deniz, A., & Özgür, E. M. (2013). Antalya'daki Rus gelinler: Göçten evliliğe, evlilikten göçe [Russian brides in Antalya: from migration to marriage, from marriage to migration]. Sosyoloji Dergisi, 3(27), 151-175.
  13. Dönmez, B., & Birdir, K. (2011). Didim’de yaşayan İngilizlerin sosyo-kültürel uyum ve yaşam tarzlarının incelenmesi [Investigation the socio-cultural adaptation and lifestyle of the British living in Didim]. 12. Ulusal Turizm Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı. Akçakoca: Düzce Üniversitesi