Journals / Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR) / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

BRINGING HERITAGE SITES TO LIFE FOR VISITORS: TOWARDS A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR IMMERSIVE EXPERIENCE

Pages
76–99
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In doing so, it suggests theways in which immersive heritage can build up meaningfulrelationships in understanding and valuing heritage sites whileenriching our experience through the absent presence between thephysical and imaginary worlds.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article aims to explore the ways in which heritage sites can bebrought to life for visitors through immersive experience, andattempts to build a conceptual framework.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sense of place isgenerated by those feelings and the meaning as a product ofinterpretation obtained by first hand experiences as well as anykind of medium.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In doing so, it suggests theways in which immersive heritage can build up meaningfulrelationships in understanding and valuing heritage sites whileenriching our experience through the absent presence between thephysical and imaginary worlds.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article aims to explore the ways in which heritage sites can bebrought to life for visitors through immersive experience, andattempts to build a conceptual framework. It is based on amultidisciplinary project carried out by scholars of differentbackgrounds, which means that it relied more on knowledge andexpertise sharing, rather than statistical data, even though afurther research on consumer behaviour is planned. In heritagesites, the tangible aspects enable first-hand experience with thephenomena, providing a strong sense of reality. On the otherhand, intangible aspects, which can be felt and evoked through themedium of heritage, are equally important. The sense of place isgenerated by those feelings and the meaning as a product ofinterpretation obtained by first hand experiences as well as anykind of medium. Getting sense of place is based on physicalfeatures making the place special or unique, stories and memoriesabiding connection to the place, as well as the spirituality orspectral aspects also called as hauntings. The essence of heritageinterpretation lies in bringing the meaning to the surface as a resultof cultural interfaces and engagements with our environment. Theconceptual framework is threefold tackling withphenomenological, narrative and semantic levels of exploration,storytelling and meaning making. This article helps to elucidate the nascent field of immersive heritage exploring the experience(physical vs. virtual), the narratives (content vs. context) and themeaning (interpretation vs. action). In doing so, it suggests theways in which immersive heritage can build up meaningfulrelationships in understanding and valuing heritage sites whileenriching our experience through the absent presence between thephysical and imaginary worlds.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOGAN, E., KAN, M. H. (2022). BRINGING HERITAGE SITES TO LIFE FOR VISITORS: TOWARDS A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR IMMERSIVE EXPERIENCE. Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR), Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 76–99. https://ajindex.com/articles/429433

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Askin, R. (2009). Mneme, anamnesis and mimesis: The function of narrative in Paul Ricoeur’s theory of memory. FIAR: Forum for Inter-American Research, 2(1). Retrieved February 28, 2020, from http://interamerica.de/currentissue/askin/#more-193
  2. Atkin, A. (2006). There's no place like "here" and no time like "now". American Philosophical Quarterly, 43(3), 271-280.
  3. Bal, M. (2009). Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  4. Barab, S. A., Sadler, T. D., Heiselt, C., Hickey, D., & Zuiker, S. (2007). Relating narrative, inquiry, and inscriptions: Supporting consequential play. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 59-82.
  5. Barcelo, J. A. (2009). Computational Intelligence in Archaeology. New York: The IGI Group. Barthes, R. (1976). The Pleasure of the Text (R. Milter, Trans.). New York: Hilland Wang. Barthes, R., & Duisit, L. (1975). An introduction to the structural analysis of narrative. New Literary History, 6(2), 237-272.
  6. Beckmann, J. (Ed.) (1998). The Virtual Dimension: Architecture, Representation and Crash Culture (pp. 145–155). New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
  7. Belsey, C. (2002). Poststructuralism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/actrade/9780192801807.001.0001 Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  9. Brogni, B., Avizzano, C., Evangelista, C., & Bergamasco, M. (1999). Technological approach for cultural heritage: Augmented reality. In: RO-MAN ’99: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interaction, pp. 206–212.
  10. Bryman, A. (1995). Disney and His Worlds. London: Routledge. Bucher, J. (2017). Storytelling for Virtual Reality: Methods and Principles. New York and Oxon: Routledge. Byrne, W. (2019, August 6). What is digital storytelling and what has it got to do with cultural heritage?, Europeana Pro. Retrieved February 28, 2020, from https://pro.europeana.eu/post/what-is-digital-storytelling-and-what-has-it-got-todo-with-cultural-heritage
  11. Ciolfi, L. (2015). Embodiment and Place Experience in Heritage Technology Design. In M. Henning (Ed.), The International Handbook of Museum Studies: Museum Media (pp. 419–446).
  12. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Crang, M. (2001). Rhythms of the city: Temporalised space and motion. In N. Thrift & J. May (Eds.), Timespace: geographies of tempor