Journals / Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR) / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Community-Based Tourism in Protected Areas: Elaborating A Model from A South African Perspective

Pages
106–131
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We show that despite numerous challenges, CBET can be viable in conservation areas, provided all parties involved in the venture make a concerted effort to ensure that the main objectives of poverty alleviation and improved environmental management are met.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Community-based ecotourism (CBET) shares many of the values and challenges of community-based tourism (CBT) but must also consider the interaction of local communities and the environment, often in areas of controlled or restricted use.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although CBT and CBET have been part of South Africa’s economic strategy, governance, and social structures and hierarchies may constrain opportunities for entry.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We show that despite numerous challenges, CBET can be viable in conservation areas, provided all parties involved in the venture make a concerted effort to ensure that the main objectives of poverty alleviation and improved environmental management are met.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Community-based ecotourism (CBET) shares many of the values and challenges of community-based tourism (CBT) but must also consider the interaction of local communities and the environment, often in areas of controlled or restricted use. Although CBT and CBET have been part of South Africa’s economic strategy, governance, and social structures and hierarchies may constrain opportunities for entry. This article reviews the relevant literature with specific reference to South African CBT and CBET enterprises and uses the iSimangaliso Wetland Park as a case study to build a general framework for CBT around conservation areas. In particular, the framework describes a pathway for CBET ventures to move from an internal partnership model to an external model and ultimately complete self-sufficiency and independence if desired. We show that despite numerous challenges, CBET can be viable in conservation areas, provided all parties involved in the venture make a concerted effort to ensure that the main objectives of poverty alleviation and improved environmental management are met.

🔖

Cite This Article

GIAMPICCOLI, A., GLASSOM, D. (2022). Community-Based Tourism in Protected Areas: Elaborating A Model from A South African Perspective. Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR), Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 106–131. https://ajindex.com/articles/429427

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224.
  2. Ashley, C., & Jones, B. (2001). Joint ventures between communities and tourism investors: Experience in South Africa. International Journal of Tourism Research, 3(5), 407-423.
  3. Asker, S., Boronyak, L., Carrard, N., & Paddon, M. (2010). Effective community based tourism: a best practice manual. APEC Tourism Working Group. Griffith University: Sustainable Tourism Cooperative Research Centre. Baktygulov, S., & Raeva, R. (2010). Creating value for all: Community-based tourism. New York: United Nations Development Programme. Bennett, N. J., & Dearden, P. (2014). Why local people do not support conservation: Community perceptions of marine protected area livelihood impacts, governance and management in Thailand. Marine Policy, 44, 107-116.
  4. Blackstock, K. (2005). A critical look at community based tourism. Community Development Journal, 40(1), 39-49. Boonzaier C., & Wilson, D. (2011). Institutionalisation of community involvement in nature conservation: The case of the Masebe Nature Reserve, South Africa. In R. van der Duim, D. Meyer, J. Saarinen, & K. Zellmer (Eds.), New Alliances for Tourism, Conservation and Development in Eastern and Southern Africa (pp. 165-184).
  5. Delft, Eburon. Borges, M. A., Carbone, G., Bushell, R., & Jaeger, T. (2011). Sustainable tourism and natural world heritage – priorities for action. Gland, IUCN. Braat, L. C., & Steetskamp, I. (1991). Ecological economic analysis for regional sustainable development. In R. Costanza (Ed.), Ecological Economics: The science and management of sustainability (pp 269-288). New York: Columbia University Press.
  6. Burgos, A., & Mertens, F. (2017). Participatory management of community-based tourism: A network perspective. Community Development, 48(4), 546-565.
  7. Calanog, L. A., Reyes, D. P. T., & Eugenio, V. F. (2012). Making ecotourism work. A manual on establishing community-based ecotourism enterprise (CBEE) in the Philippines. Makati City, Japan International Cooperation Agency. Chiutsi, S., & Saarinen, J. (2017). Local participation in transfrontier tourism: Case of Sengwe community in Great Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area, Zimbabwe. Development Southern Africa, 34(3), 260-275.
  8. Dahlberg, A. C., & Burlando, C. (2009). Addressing trade-offs: Experiences from conservation and development initiatives in the Mkuze Wetlands, South Africa. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 37. Dangi, T. B., &