Journals / Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR) / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

The Effect of Market-Oriented and Brand-Oriented Service Improvement on Hotel Performance

Pages
29–48
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Similarly, service improvement and economic performance relationship is mediated by customer performance, and customer orientation and economic performance relationship by brand orientation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study tests a holistic model covering the antecedents and consequences of service improvement within the context of the hospitality industry.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Consequences of service improvement, on the other hand, are the sub-dimensions of hotel performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Similarly, service improvement and economic performance relationship is mediated by customer performance, and customer orientation and economic performance relationship by brand orientation.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study tests a holistic model covering the antecedents and consequences of service improvement within the context of the hospitality industry. Market orientation and brand orientation are considered among the antecedents of service improvement. Consequences of service improvement, on the other hand, are the sub-dimensions of hotel performance. Data were collected from 121 hotel managers via online questionnaire technique. The research model was tested with PLS-SEM method. Findings related to the direct effect hypotheses show that customer orientation has positive effects on brand orientation and service improvement. While competitor orientation affects brand orientation positively, it does not have a direct effect on service improvement. There is a positive relationship between brand orientation and service improvement. Service improvement enhances the customer performance of a hospitality enterprise while not having a direct effect on the economic performance of the enterprise. On the other hand, customer performance of a hotel increases the economic performance and economic performance enhances its financial performance. Hypotheses concerning the indirect effect indicate that competitor orientation affects service improvement behavior through brand orientation. Similarly, service improvement and economic performance relationship is mediated by customer performance, and customer orientation and economic performance relationship by brand orientation.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOP, S. A. (2022). The Effect of Market-Oriented and Brand-Oriented Service Improvement on Hotel Performance. Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR), Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 29–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/429415

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ali, F., Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Ryu, K. (2018). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in hospitality research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(1), 514-538.
  2. Alnawas, I., & Hemsley-Brown, J. (2019). Market orientation and hotel performance: Investigating the role of high-order marketing capabilities. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(4), 1885-1905.
  3. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
  4. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
  5. Baumgarth, C., Merrilees, B., & Urde, M. (2013) Brand orientation: Past, present, and future. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(9-10), 973-980.
  6. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
  7. Campo, S., Díaz, A. M., & Yagüe, M. J. (2014). Market orientation in mid-range service, urban hotels: How to apply the MKTOR instrument. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 43, 76-86.
  8. Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., & Martinez, A. (2010). Managing environmental knowledge through learning processes in Spanish hospitality companies. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13(2), 827–840.
  9. Chang, S., Gong, Y., & Shum, C. (2011). Promoting innovation in hospitality companies through human resource management practices. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(4), 812-818.
  10. Cheng, C. C., Chen, C. T., Hsu, F. S., & Hu, H. Y. (2012). Enhancing service quality improvement strategies of fine-dining restaurants: New insights from integrating a two-phase decision-making model of IPGA and DEMATEL analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(4), 1155–1166.
  11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Dev, C., Zhou, K. Z., Brown, J., & Agarwal, S. (2009). Customer orientation or competitor orientation: Which marketing strategy has a higher payoff for hotel brands?. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 50(1), 19-28.
  12. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  13. Grissemann, U., Plank, A., & Brunn