SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

Derivation of Equations for Flexure and Shear Deflections of Simply Supported Beams

Basit Mesnetli Kirişlerde Eğilme ve Kaymadan Dolayı Oluşan Sehim Denklemlerinin Bulunması

Ümran ESENDEMİR
Pages
187–193
Publication Date
2009-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The shear effect is the smallest for 45 orientation angle and the biggest for 0 orientation angle.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Shear deflection of wood beams generally is exluded in plannning calculations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ignoring shear deflection could cause significant errors, expecially for short and thick beams.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The shear effect is the smallest for 45 orientation angle and the biggest for 0 orientation angle.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kayma etkisi · Kaymadan dolayı oluşan sehim · Basit desteklenmiş kompozit kiriş

Abstract

Shear deflection of wood beams generally is exluded in plannning calculations. Ignoring shear deflection could cause significant errors, expecially for short and thick beams. In this study, two deflection functions due to flexure and shear of simply supported composite beam subjected to single force are obtained analytically. Wood being high shear modulus according to other material is selected for sample problem. The deflections the mid point of the beam are calculated to see the effect of shear by using the obtained functions for 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 orientation angles. Also, bending stresses at the mid point of the short beam are given for 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 orientation angles. It is shown that the magnitude of shear deflection depends on force, length and height of the beam. The shear effect is the smallest for 45 orientation angle and the biggest for 0 orientation angle.

Özet

Kiriş uygulamalarının genelinde kaymadan dolayı oluşan sehimler ihmal edilir. Fakat; yüksek kayma modülüne sahip, kısa ve kalın kirişlerde kaymadan dolayı oluşan sehimin ihmal edilmesi çok büyük hatalara neden olmaktadır. Bu çalışmada her iki tarafında mesnetlenmiş orta noktasından tekil yüke maruz kompozit kirişlerdeki eğilme ve kaymadan dolayı ortaya çıkan sehim denklemleri analitik olarak elde edilmiştir. Örnek malzeme olarak kayma modülü diğer malzemelere göre yüksek olan ahşap seçilmiştir. Kaymanın etkisini incelemek için, elde edilen fonksiyonlar kullanılarak, kirişin orta noktasındaki maksimum sehimler 0, 30, 45, 60 and 90 oryantasyon açıları için elde edilmiştir. Aynı zamanda kayma etkisinin en fazla olduğu kısa kirişin orta noktasındaki eğilme gerilmeleri 0, 30, 45, 60 ve 90 oryantasyon açıları için verilmiştir. Kaymadan dolayı oluşan sehimin; kirişe uygulanan yüke, kirişin uzunluğuna ve yüksekliğine göre değiştiği tespit edilmiştir. Kayma etkisi; 45 oryantasyon açısında en küçük, 0 oryantasyon açısında ise en büyük olmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ESENDEMİR, Ü. (2009). Derivation of Equations for Flexure and Shear Deflections of Simply Supported Beams. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 187–193. https://ajindex.com/articles/42902

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Altenbach, H. 2000. On the determination of transverse shear stiffnesses of orthotropic plates, Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik and Physik, 51 (4), 629-649.
  2. Aydoğan, M. 1995. Stiffness-matrix formulation of beams with shear effect on elastic foundation, Journal of Structural Engineering, 121 (9), 12651270. Biblis, E. J. 1997. Shear deflection of two species laminated wood beams, Wood Science and Technology. 1 (3), 231-238.
  3. Esendemir, Ü. 2004. An elastic-plastic stress analysis in a polymer-matrix composite beam of arbitrary orientation supported from two ends acted upon with a force at the mid point. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 23 (6), 613-623.
  4. Esendemir, Ü. 2005. The effects of shear on the deflection of linearly loaded composite cantilever beam, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. 24 (11), 1159-1168.
  5. Esendemir, Ü., Usal, M.R., Usal, M. 2006. The effects of shear on the deflection of simply supported composite beam loaded linearly, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. 25 (8), 835-846.
  6. Evangelas, J. Biblis, 1967. Shear deflection of two species laminated wood beams, Wood Science and Technology. 1 (3), 231-238.
  7. Faella, C., Martinelli, E., and Nigro, E. 2003. Shear connection nonlinearity and deflections of steel concrete composite beams: a simplified method, Journal of Structural Engineering. 129 (1), 12-20.
  8. Hiroaki, K., Tohru, N. 1993. Shear deflection of anisotropic plates. JSME Internatianal Journal Series A: Mechanics and Material Engineering. 36 (1). 7379. Jones, R. M. 1975. Mechanics of composite materials. Mcgraw-Hill, Kogakusha, Tokyo. Kılıç, O., Aktaş, A. and Dirikolu, M.H. 2001. An investigating of the effects of shear on the deflection of an orthotropic cantilever beam by use of anisotropic elasticity theory. Composites Science and Technology. (61), 2055-2061.
  9. Kubojima, Y., Ohtani, T., and Yoshihara, H. 2004. Effect of shear deflection on vibrational properties of compressed wood, Wood Science and Technology. 38 (3), 237-244.
  10. Lee, S.J, Reddy, J.N. 2004. Nonlinear deflection control of laminated plates using third-order shear deformation theory, International journal of Mechanics and Materials Design, 1 (1), 33-61.
  11. Lekhnitskii, S.G. 1968.
  12. Anisotropic Plates, Gordon and Breach Science, New York. Lekhnitskii, S.G. 1981. Theory of Elasticity of an Anisotropic Body. Mir Publishers,
  13. Moscow. Liu, J.Y and Rammer, D.R. 2003. Analysis of wood cantilever loaded at free end, Wood and Fiber Science. 35 (3), 334-34