With the development in cutting operation, the surface properties which get from the the finishing operation and preparation to manifacture applications have a great importance.Generally the variation features of material, the edge cutting deformation, surface properties and the geometry of the canal characterize the processing quality in the cutting methods.In a cutting operation the aim is to get the cut surface in a very short time with high quality.The answer is searching for the question, which technique for which material must be use to get a good efficiency.In this study the aim was to cut the material AISI 1030, which is used very frequently in manifacture industry, with very common methods and to get and evaluate effects of results on mechanic and metallurgic properties of material.So the result of this study is the method in cutting with ASJ is the most efficient and with oxygen is least efficient.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With the development in cutting operation, the surface properties which get from the the finishing operation and preparation to manifacture applications have a great importance.Generally the variation features of material, the edge cutting deformation, surface properties and the geometry of the canal characterize the processing quality in the cutting methods.In a cutting operation the aim is to get the cut surface in a very short time with high quality.The answer is searching for the question, which technique for which material must be use to get a good efficiency.In this study the aim was to cut the material AISI 1030, which is used very frequently in manifacture industry, with very common methods and to get and evaluate effects of results on mechanic and metallurgic properties of material.So the result of this study is the method in cutting with ASJ is the most efficient and with oxygen is least efficient.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With the development in cutting operation, the surface properties which get from the the finishing operation and preparation to manifacture applications have a great importance.Generally the variation features of material, the edge cutting deformation, surface properties and the geometry of the canal characterize the processing quality in the cutting methods.In a cutting operation the aim is to get the cut surface in a very short time with high quality.The answer is searching for the question, which technique for which material must be use to get a good efficiency.In this study the aim was to cut the material AISI 1030, which is used very frequently in manifacture industry, with very common methods and to get and evaluate effects of results on mechanic and metallurgic properties of material.So the result of this study is the method in cutting with ASJ is the most efficient and with oxygen is least efficient.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With the development in cutting operation, the surface properties which get from the the finishing operation and preparation to manifacture applications have a great importance.Generally the variation features of material, the edge cutting deformation, surface properties and the geometry of the canal characterize the processing quality in the cutting methods.In a cutting operation the aim is to get the cut surface in a very short time with high quality.The answer is searching for the question, which technique for which material must be use to get a good efficiency.In this study the aim was to cut the material AISI 1030, which is used very frequently in manifacture industry, with very common methods and to get and evaluate effects of results on mechanic and metallurgic properties of material.So the result of this study is the method in cutting with ASJ is the most efficient and with oxygen is least efficient.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kesme yöntemleri · Kesme yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması · AISI 1030 malzeme
Abstract
With the development in cutting operation, the surface properties which get from the the finishing operation and preparation to manifacture applications have a great importance.Generally the variation features of material, the edge cutting deformation, surface properties and the geometry of the canal characterize the processing quality in the cutting methods.In a cutting operation the aim is to get the cut surface in a very short time with high quality.The answer is searching for the question, which technique for which material must be use to get a good efficiency.In this study the aim was to cut the material AISI 1030, which is used very frequently in manifacture industry, with very common methods and to get and evaluate effects of results on mechanic and metallurgic properties of material.So the result of this study is the method in cutting with ASJ is the most efficient and with oxygen is least efficient.
Özet
Kesme teknolojisindeki gelişmelerle birlikte, imalata hazırlık ve özellikle son işlem uygulamalarında elde edilen yüzey özellikleri büyük öneme sahiptir. Kesme yöntemlerindeki işleme kalitesi genel olarak; malzeme özelliklerindeki değişim, kesme kenar deformasyonu, elde edilen yüzey özellikleri ve kesilen kanalın geometrisi ile karakterize edilmektedir. Bir kesme işleminde temelde hedeflenen; en hızlı ve en kaliteli kesik yüzeyin elde edilmesidir. Aşındırıcılı su jetinin dışında birçok yöntemin yaygın kullanımı beraberinde hangi malzemenin hangi yöntemle kesilmesi daha verimli olmaktadır? ve benzeri sorularına yanıt aranmaktadır. Bu çalışma makine imalat sanayinde yoğun kullanılmakta olan AISI 1030 malzemenin yaygın kullanılmakta olan kesme yöntemleri ile kesilmesi ve elde edilen sonuçların malzemenin mekaniksel ve metalürjik özellikleri üzerindeki etkilerini araştırarak, değerlendirilmesini kapsamaktadır. Tüm veriler ışığında; ASJ ile kesmenin en verimli yöntem, oksijen ile kesme yönteminin ise en verimsiz olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.
AKKURT, A. (2009). Comparision of Cut Surface Properties Obtained from AISI 1030 Steel by Abresive Water Jet and by Other Methodologies. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 142–152. https://ajindex.com/articles/42896
Akkurt, A. 2002. “Çeşitli malzemelerin aşındırıcı su jeti ile kesilmesinde yüzey özellikleri, Sertlik ve mikro yapı değişimlerinin farklı kesme yöntemleriyle karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi”, Doktora Tezi, G.Ü., Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Blickwedel, H., Guo, N. S., Haferkamp, H., Louis, H. 1990. “Prediction of abrasive jet cutting performance and quality“, Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on Jet Cutting Technology, pp. 163-179,
BHRA, Fluid Engineering Centre, Cranfield, UK. Engel, S.L., Labus, T.J. 1993. “Industrial applications and comparison of lazer and abrasive waterjet technologies”, Fluid Jet Technology–Fundamentals and Applications. 2nd Ed., ISBN 1-880342-01-4,
Publ. by the WJTA, St. Louis, MO, USA. Fukunishi, Y., Kobayashi, R., Uchida, K. 1995. “Numerical simulation of striation on water jet cutting surface”, Proc. of 8th American Water Jet Conference, pp. 157-169,
Houston, USA. Guo, N. S., Louis, H., Meier, G. 1992. Recycling capability of abrasive water jet cutting” In:Lichtarowicz A (1992) jet Cutting Technol., Kluwer Acad, Publ., Dordrecht, pp 503-523.
Hashish, M. 1984. “A Modeling study of metal cutting with abrasive waterjets”, ASME Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, Vol, 106, No. 1, pp. 88-100.
Hashish, M. 1988. “Applications of metal cutting with abrasive-waterjets”, Proceedings: Conference of Nontraditional Machining. pp. 1-11.
Hashish, M. 1989. “Characteristics of surfaces machined with abrasive waterjets machining characteristics of advanced meterials”, Winter Annual Meeting of ASME, pp. 23-32,
San Francisco, USA. Hashish, M. 1991. “Caracteristics of surfaces machined with abrasive waterjet”, J.of Eng. Mat. And Tech., Vol. 113, pp. 354-362.
Hashish, M. 1993a. “The effect of beam angle in abrasive waterjet machining”, Journal of Engineering for Industry, Vol. 115, pp. 51-56.
Hashish, M. 1993b. “Prediction models for ASJ machining operations”, 7th American Water Jet Conference, pp. 205-216,
Seattle, USA. Matsumoto, O., Sugihara, M., Miya, K. 1992.“Under water cutting of reactor core internals by co lazer using local-dry-zone creating nozzle”, Journal of Nuclear Science andTechnology, Vol. 29, No:11, pp. 1074- 1079, November. Momber, A. 1995. “A simplified mathematical energy dissipation model for water jet and abrasive water jet cutting processes”, 8th Amer. Water Jet Conference. pp. 829- 843, August 26-29,
Houston. Momber, A.W., Kovacevic, R. 1988. “Principles of ASJ machining”, Springer-Verlag London Lim