Journals / ADALYA / 2011 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 14

Trysa Heroonu’nun Kuzey ve Doğu yüzlerindeki Frizin kompozisyonu üzerine düşünceler;

Journal
ADALYA
Pages
31–56
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With regard to the frieze of the Heroon’s north side one can ascertain a creation rich in variations of the figures which are taken absolutely not only from “pattern books” or patterns, but also reflect independent compositions by the executing sculptor.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:On the frieze of the Trysa Heroon, as often ascertained by the researchers, several sculptors were active.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sculptor of the north side had to take into consideration, in addition, the sharply decreasing height of the plates, which he was possibly not informed during the manufacture of the drafts.The theme, that is, the content of a depiction played a significant role and an artist was regarded successful if he could place contents persuasively in the desired picture form.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With regard to the frieze of the Heroon’s north side one can ascertain a creation rich in variations of the figures which are taken absolutely not only from “pattern books” or patterns, but also reflect independent compositions by the executing sculptor.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

On the frieze of the Trysa Heroon, as often ascertained by the researchers, several sculptors were active. The quality the frieze of the north and east sides of the Heroon of Trysa was often remarked in older research and was called, for instance, “run meter”, “spontaneous composition” or as a “frieze in the so-called style”. The hunting and centaur frieze of the north and east side show another style and a different composition, a less dense figure arrangement and a lower relief depth than the friezes of the west and south sides of the Heroon. In case of precise consideration, these friezes turn out to be an independent composition which takes into consideration the contents of the depiction, the number of the involved figures and the height of the frieze plates. In the paper it is tried to show that large compositions with low number of figures involved are observed on numerous monuments and on the frieze of the Heroon they are to be understood as an expression of the variety of sculptural drafts. The sculptor of the north side had to take into consideration, in addition, the sharply decreasing height of the plates, which he was possibly not informed during the manufacture of the drafts.The theme, that is, the content of a depiction played a significant role and an artist was regarded successful if he could place contents persuasively in the desired picture form. With regard to the frieze of the Heroon’s north side one can ascertain a creation rich in variations of the figures which are taken absolutely not only from “pattern books” or patterns, but also reflect independent compositions by the executing sculptor.

🔖

Cite This Article

LANDSKRON, A. (2022). Trysa Heroonu’nun Kuzey ve Doğu yüzlerindeki Frizin kompozisyonu üzerine düşünceler;. ADALYA, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 14, 31–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/428174

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akurgal 1961
  2. E. Akurgal, Die Kunst der Hethiter (1961). Akurgal 1993 E. Akurgal, „Die einheimischen und fremden Elemente in der lykischen Kunst und ihre Eigenheiten", in: J. Borchhardt - G. Dobesch (eds.), Akten des II. internation-alen Lykien-Symposions I. Wien, 6.-12. Mai 1990 (1993) 149-159. Barringer 2001
  3. J. M. Barringer, The Hunt in Ancient Greece (2001). Benndorf 1882 O. Benndorf, „Vorlâufiger Bericht über zwei österreichische archâologische Expeditionen nach Kleinasien", AEM 6, 1882, 151-252. Benndorf - Niemann 1989
  4. O. Benndorf - G. Niemann, Das Heroon von Gjölbaschi-Trysa (1889). Berger 1986
  5. E. Berger, Der Parthenon in Basel. Dokumentation zu den Metopen (1986). Bittel 1934
  6. K. Bittel, Die Felsbilder von Yazilikaya, IstForsch 5 (1934). Bockelberg 1979
  7. S. von Bockelberg, Die Friese des Hephaisteion, AntPl XVIII (1979) 23-50. Bol 2004 P. C. Bol (ed.), Die Geschichte der antiken Bildhauerkunst II. Klassische Plastik (2004). Borbein 1987
  8. A. H. Borbein, BJb 187, 1987, 714-718. Borbein 2005 A. H. Borbein, „Sinn und Unsinn der Meisterforschung", in: V. M. Strocka (ed.), Meisterwerke. Internationales Symposion anlâlâlich des 150. Geburtstages von Adolf Furtwangler, Freiburg im Breisgau 30. Juni-3. Juli 2003 (2005) 223-234. Borchhardt 1968 J. Borchhardt, „Epichorische, grâko-persisch beeinflufâte Reliefs in Kilikien", IstMitt 18, 1968, 161-211. Borchhardt 1975 J. Borchhardt, „Limyra: Bericht über die Grabungskampagne 1973", TürkAD 22,2, 1975, 39-53. Borchhardt 1975a J. Borchhardt (ed.), Myra. Eine lykische Metropole in antiker und byzantinischer Zeit, IstForsch 30 (1975). Borchhardt 1976
  9. J. Borchhardt, Die Bauskulptur des Heroons von Limyra. Das Grabmal des lykischen Königs Perikles, IstForsch 32 (1976). Brommer 1967
  10. F. Brommer, Die Metopen des Parthenon (1967). Bruns-Özgan 1987
  11. C. Bruns-Özgan, Lykische Grabreliefs des 5. und 4. Jhs. v. Chr., IstMitt Beih. 33 (1987) Buitron-Oliver 1997 D. Buitron-Oliver (ed.), The Interpretation of Architectural Sculpture in Greece and Rome, Proceedings of the Symposion Washington, DC 1993 (1997). Carl 2006
  12. T. Carl, Bild und Betrachter. Râumliche Darstellung in der griechischen Kunst des ausgehenden 5. Jhs. v. Chr., Internationale Archâologie 95 (2006). Childs 1976 W. A. P. Childs, "Prolegomena to a Lycian Chronology, 2. The Heroon From Trysa", RA 1976, 281-316. Childs 2005 W. A. P. Childs, „Stil als Inhalt statt als Künstlersignatur", in: V. M. Strocka (ed.), Meisterwerke. Internationales Symposion anlasslich des 150. Gebur