Journals / Acta Veterinaria Eurasia / 2019 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3

Morphological Characteristics of Pacing Horses and Examination of Breeding Conditions

Pages
91–95
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall means of height at wither, bodylength, rump length, chest depth, chest circumference, headlength, and forehead width were measured: 142.42, 145.15,49.77, 55.43, 161.44, 51.94, and 21.52 cm respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to examine the morphologicalcharacteristics and breeding conditions of pacing horses inthe Afyonkarahisar province.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 117 head of pacing horses, as well as farm operations and opinions of horse owners,were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall means of height at wither, bodylength, rump length, chest depth, chest circumference, headlength, and forehead width were measured: 142.42, 145.15,49.77, 55.43, 161.44, 51.94, and 21.52 cm respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the morphologicalcharacteristics and breeding conditions of pacing horses inthe Afyonkarahisar province. A total of 117 head of pacing horses, as well as farm operations and opinions of horse owners,were evaluated. The overall means of height at wither, bodylength, rump length, chest depth, chest circumference, headlength, and forehead width were measured: 142.42, 145.15,49.77, 55.43, 161.44, 51.94, and 21.52 cm respectively. It wasdetermined that horses with Turkish native genotypes and 1-3elder horses had the lowest body measurements. It was determined that the pacing horses had the bay, chestnut, gray,black, and chestnut paint coat colors. It has been determinedthat, in the choosing of pacing horses, horse owners pay greatattention to the parent information (71.1%), the temperament(71.1%), body condition (68.9%), and the foot-nail structure(62.2%) of horses. As a result, it was concluded that the pacinghorses with native genotypes in the Afyonkarahisar provincewere smaller than those who were crossbred and of foreignorigin. Also, it was determined that the horses examined wereof the bay, chestnut, gray, and black coat colors. In addition, itwas concluded that the breeding conditions of pacing horsesshould be improved, and the horse owners should be informed about horse training and exercising.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKYOL, H., KOÇAK, S. (2022). Morphological Characteristics of Pacing Horses and Examination of Breeding Conditions. Acta Veterinaria Eurasia, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3, 91–95. https://ajindex.com/articles/428044

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Andersson, L.S., Larhammar, M., Memic, F., Wootz, H., Schwochow, D., Rubin, C.J., Patra, K., Arnason, T., Wellbring, L., Hjälm, G., Imsland, F., Petersen, J.L., Mccue, M.C., Mickelson, J.R., Cothran, G., Ahituv, N., Roepstorff, L., Mikko, S., Vallstedt, A., Lindgren, G., Andersson, L., Kullander, K., 2012. Mutations in DMRT3 affect locomotion in horses and circuit function in Mice. Nature 488, 642-646. [CrossRef] Anonymous, 2017a. Icelandic Horse: https://www.icelandics.org/standards.php#6 (Accessed on 10.11.2017). Anonymous, 2017b. Paso Fino Horse: http://www.pfha.org/ (Accessed on 13.11.2017). Anonymous, 2017c. American Saddlebred Horse: https://www.asha. net/aboutus/theamericansaddlebred (Accessed on 10.11.2017). Anonymous, 2017d. Türkiye Geleneksel Spor Dalları Federasyonu Rahvan Binicilik Müsabaka Talimatı: https://www.gsdf.gov.tr/uploads/ default/reports/7418be2f1b20ff38539f1df7ed74b678.pdf (Accessed on 13.11.2017).
  2. Arıtürk, E., 1956.
  3. Türkiye Atçılığının Bugünkü Durumu, Meseleleri ve Yerli Atlarımızın Morfolojik Vasıfları Üstüne Araştırmalar. Yeni Desen Matbaası, Ankara.
  4. Arpacık, R., 1999. At Yetiştiriciliği. 3. Baskı.
  5. Şahin Matbaası, Ankara.
  6. Bayram, D., Öztürk, Y., Küçük, M., 2005. Van yöresinde yetiştirilen atlarda fenotipik özellikler. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 16, 85-88.
  7. Çağlayan, T., İnal, Ş., Garip, M., Coşkun, B., İnal, F., Günlü, A., Güleç, E., 2010. The determination of situation and breed characteristics of Turkish rahvan horse in Turkey. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 9, 674-680. [CrossRef] FAO, 2019. FAO Statistics: http://faostat3.fao.org/download//q1/e (Accessed on 05.01.2019).
  8. Gücüyener Hacan, Ö., Akçapınar, H., 2011. Farklı haralarda yetiştirilen Safkan Arap atlarında bazı fenotipik ve genetik parametreler. I. Vücut ölçüleri ve kalıtım dereceleri. Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 51, 55-70.
  9. Gücüyener Hacan, Ö., Akçapınar, H., 2012. Farklı haralarda yetiştirilen Safkan Arap atlarında bazı fenotipik ve genetik parametreler. II. Don, nişaneler, alında servi ve kalıtım dereceleri. Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 52, 15-26.
  10. Güleç, E., 1995. Türk At Irkları. Anadolu At Irklarını Yaşatma ve Geliştirme Derneği, Ankara.
  11. Kırmızıbayrak, T., Aksoy, A., Tilki, M., Saatçi, M., 2004. Kars yöresi Türk yerli atlarının morfolojik özelliklerinin incelenmesi. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 10, 69-72.
  12. Özbeyaz, C., Akçapınar, H., 2005. At Yetiştiriciliği Ders Notları. Ank