Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2021 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 5

Clinical usefulness of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in the overweight and obese population following an acute ankle injury: A prospective cross-sectional study

Pages
435–438
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, 935 adult patients (453 female, 482 male; mean age = 57.2 ± 20.9) admitted to the emergency department following an acute ankle injury (

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the clinical usefulness of the Ottawa Ankle Rules (OAR) in overweight and obese patients compared to the general population.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the clinical usefulness of the Ottawa Ankle Rules (OAR) in overweight and obese patients compared to the general population.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, 935 adult patients (453 female, 482 male; mean age = 57.2 ± 20.9) admitted to the emergency department following an acute ankle injury (
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the clinical usefulness of the Ottawa Ankle Rules (OAR) in overweight and obese patients compared to the general population. Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, 935 adult patients (453 female, 482 male; mean age = 57.2 ± 20.9) admitted to the emergency department following an acute ankle injury (

🔖

Cite This Article

Özbay, H., Yüksel, S. (2022). Clinical usefulness of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in the overweight and obese population following an acute ankle injury: A prospective cross-sectional study. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 5, 435–438. https://ajindex.com/articles/427990

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Lambers K, Ootes D, Ring D. Incidence of patients with lower extremity injuries presenting toUS emergency departments by anatomic region, disease category and age. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(1):284-290. 10.1007/ s11999-011-1982-z 2. Lau LH, Kerr D, Law I, Ritchie P. Nurse practitioners treating ankle and foot injuries using the Ottawa ankle rules: A comparative study in the emergency department. Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2013;16(3):110-115. 10.1016/j.aenj.2013. 05.007 3. Bachmann L, Kolb E, Koller MT, Steurer J, Ter Riet G. Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and midfoot: A systematic review. Br Med J. 2003;326(7386):417. 10.1136/bmj.326.7386.417 4. Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, McKnight RD, et al. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement anfprospective validation. JAMA. 1993;269(9):1127-1132. 10.1001/jama.269.9.1127 5. Maclellan J, Smith T, Baserman J, Dowling S. Accuracy of the Ottawa ankle rules applied by non-physician providers in a pediatric emergency department. CJEM. 2018;20(5):746-752. 10.1017/cem.2017.399 6. Murphy J, Weiner DA, Kotler J, et al. Utility of Ottawa ankle rules in aging population: Evidence for addition of an age criterion. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020;59(2):286-290. 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.04.017 7. Chaundry S, Egol KA. Ankle injuries and fractures in the obese patient. Orthop Clin North Am. 2011;42(1):45-53. 10.1016/j.ocl.2010.07.003 8. Beckenkamp PR, Lin CC, Macaskill P, Michaleff ZA, Maher CG, Moseley AM. Diagnostic accuracy of the Ottawa ankle and midfoot rules: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2016;51(6):504-510. 10.1136/bjsports- 2016-096858 9. Vosseller JT, Karl JW, Greisberg JK. Incidence of Syndesmotic Injury. Orthopedics. 2014;37(3):226-229. 10.3928/01477447-20140225-53 10. Tummala SV, Hartigan DE, Makovicka JL, Patel KA, Chhabra A. 10-Year epidemiology of ankle injuries in men’s and women’s collegiate basketball. Orthop J Spor ts Med. 2018;6(11): 232596711880540. 10.1177/ 2325967118805400 11. Meena S, Gangari SK. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in Indian Scenario. Arch Trauma Res. 2015;4(2):20-22. 10.5812/atr.4(2)2015.20969 12. Dwivedi R, Ale SB. Evaluation of the Accuracy of “Ottawa Ankle Rules” for predicting Fractures in acute Ankle and Midfoot injuries. J Univ Coll Med Sci. 2014;2(6):1-4. 10.3126/jucms.v2i2.11166 13. Perry S, Raby N, Grant PT. Prospective survey to verify the Ottawa ankle rules. J Accid Emerg Med. 1999;16(4):258-2