Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2021 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 5

Clinical and radiological results of three different techniques for fixation of the olecranon osteotomy in the surgical treatment of distal humerus fractures: A retrospective comparison of plate-screw, tension band and intramedullary nail

Pages
410–416
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The results of this study have shown that successful and comparable radiological and functional outcomes can be obtained by all the three different olecranon osteotomy techniques in the surgical treatment of intercondylar fracture of the distal humerus.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiological results of three different techniques (plate-screw, tension band, and intramedullary nail) in the fixation of olecranon osteotomy in patients with intercondylar fracture of the distal humerus surgically treated by the olecranon osteotomy approach.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Between January 2010 and December 2018, the study was initiated with 52 patients who underwent an olecranon osteotomy approach for an AO Type C distal humerus fracture.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The results of this study have shown that successful and comparable radiological and functional outcomes can be obtained by all the three different olecranon osteotomy techniques in the surgical treatment of intercondylar fracture of the distal humerus.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiological results of three different techniques (plate-screw, tension band, and intramedullary nail) in the fixation of olecranon osteotomy in patients with intercondylar fracture of the distal humerus surgically treated by the olecranon osteotomy approach. Methods: Between January 2010 and December 2018, the study was initiated with 52 patients who underwent an olecranon osteotomy approach for an AO Type C distal humerus fracture. Thirty-seven patients (19 male, 18 female) who had regular control data and a final control examination were included in the study. In osteotomy fixation, we used tension band (K wire cerclage + Screw cerclage) in 20 patients, plate-screw in eight patients, and intramedullary nail fixation in nine patients. The functional evaluation included a measurement of the range of joint motion (flexion, extension, supination, pronation); MAYO elbow performance score; disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score; and comparative grip strength measurement, and a subjective pain assessment was performed using the visual analogue scale. Results: The mean duration of follow-up was 44 (12-84) months. The mean time to union was 14 (7-32) weeks in patients that achieved union. The mean DASH score was 22 (0-72.7), the mean MAYO elbow performance score was 84 (35-100), and the mean VAS score was 3 (1-7). The mean grip strength was 32 (8-64) kgw in the treated extremity and 37 (17-70) kgw in the intact extremity. No statistically significant difference was detected between olecranon osteotomy fixation methods (tension band, plate-screw osteosynthesis, and intramedullary nailing) in terms of union time, DASH score, MAYO scale score, VAS score, extension, supination, and pronation (P > 0.05). The average grip strength (kgw) was lower than that in the uninvolved extremity, and this ratio was statistically significant (P = 0.04). Conclusion: The results of this study have shown that successful and comparable radiological and functional outcomes can be obtained by all the three different olecranon osteotomy techniques in the surgical treatment of intercondylar fracture of the distal humerus.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yıldız, V., Köse, A., Aydın, A., Dinçer, R., Baydar, M., Ayas, M. S. (2022). Clinical and radiological results of three different techniques for fixation of the olecranon osteotomy in the surgical treatment of distal humerus fractures: A retrospective comparison of plate-screw, tension band and intramedullary nail. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 5, 410–416. https://ajindex.com/articles/427981

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Robinson CM, Hill RM, Jacobs N, Dall G, Court-Brown CM. Adult distal humeral metaphyseal fractures: Epidemiology and results of treatment. J Orthop Trauma. 2003
  2. 17(1):38-47. 10.1097/00005131-200301000-00006 2. Atalar AC, Demirhan M, Salduz A, Kiliçoğlu O, Seyahi A. Functional results of the parallel-plate technique for complex distal humerusfractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2009
  3. 43(1):21-27. 10.3944/AOTT.2009.021 3. Ansari MF, Khan NA, Atif AM. Management of type 13C2 distal humerus fractures by olecranon osteotomy approach versus triceps sparing approach— our experience with sixty cases. Int Orthop. 2020
  4. 44(12):2735-2742. 10.1007/ s00264-020-04785-6 4. McKee MD, Jupiter JB, Bamberger HB. Coronal shear fractures of the distal end of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996
  5. 78(1):49-54. 10.2106/00004623- 199601000-00007 5. Brouwer KM, Guitton TG, Doornberg JN, Kloen P, Jupiter JB, Ring D. Fractures of the medial column of the distal humerus in adults. J Hand Surg Am. 2009
  6. 34 (3):439-445. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.11.022 6. Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium. J Orthop Trauma. 2007
  7. 21(10 Suppl):S1-133. 10.1097/ 00005131-200711101-00001 7. Miller AN, Beingessner DM. Intra-articular distal humerus fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 2013
  8. 44(1):35-45. 10.1016/j.ocl.2012.08.010 8. Zalavras CG, Vercillo MT, Jun BJ, Otarodifard K, Itamura JM, Lee TQ. Biomechanical evaluation of parallel versus orthogonal plate fixation of intra-articular distal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011
  9. 20(1):12-20. 10.1016/j. jse.2010.08.005 9. O’Driscoll SW. Optimizing stability in distal humeral fracture fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005
  10. 14(1):186-194. 10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.033 10. Shin SJ, Sohn HS, Do NH. A clinical comparison of two different double plating methods for intraarticular distal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010
  11. 19(1):2-9. 10.1016/j.jse.2009.05.003 11. Patel J, Motwani G, Shah H, Daveshwar R. Outcome after internal fixation of intraarticular distal humerus (AO type B & C) fractures: Preliminary results with anatomical distal humerus LCP system. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017
  12. 8 (1):63-67. 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.02.004 12. Ring D, Jawa A, Cannada L. Clinical Faceoff: Are distal-third diaphyseal humerus fractures best treated nonoperatively? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016
  13. 474 (2):310-314. 10.1007/s11999-015-4636-8 13. Lee SK, Kim KJ, Park KH, Choy WS. A comparison between orthogonal and parallel plating meth