Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2022 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2

Serial magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the early reaction of all-suture anchors in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Pages
111–115
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Evidence from this study has revealed low rates of cyst formation but significant increases in tunnel volume at the early follow-up following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with ASAs

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the early reaction of all-suture anchors (ASAs) in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This retrospective case series comprised 23 patients (8 women, 15 men; mean age = 59.9 years, age range = 36–73 years) with medium-size rotator cuff tear who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Evidence from this study has revealed low rates of cyst formation but significant increases in tunnel volume at the early follow-up following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with ASAs
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the early reaction of all-suture anchors (ASAs) in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods: This retrospective case series comprised 23 patients (8 women, 15 men; mean age = 59.9 years, age range = 36–73 years) with medium-size rotator cuff tear who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. All patients underwent postoperative serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Demographic and operative characteristics were recorded. MRIs were evaluated for osseous cyst formation, and tunnel volume was measured. Statistical analyses were performed to detect differences in the serial MRI follow-up observation. Results: A total of 39 ASAs were evaluated. Osseous cyst formation was found in two ASAs (5.1%) at the 6-month follow-up. Tunnel expansion was significantly observed in both 3- and 6-month postoperative MRI evaluations (P < 0.001). The mean tunnel volume significantly increased 1.95 times at the 3-month follow-up and 2.84 times at the 6-month follow-up (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Evidence from this study has revealed low rates of cyst formation but significant increases in tunnel volume at the early follow-up following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with ASAs

🔖

Cite This Article

Hwang, J., Sun, Y., Koh, K., Jeon, I., Kholinne, E., Kwak, J. (2022). Serial magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the early reaction of all-suture anchors in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2, 111–115. https://ajindex.com/articles/427972

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Kaar TK, Schenck RCJr., Wirth MA, Rockwood CAJr. Complications of metallic suture anchors in shoulder surgery: A report of 8 cases. Arthroscopy 2001
  2. 17 (1):31-37. 10.1053/jars.2001.18246 2. Speer KP, Warren RF, Pagnani M, Warner JJ. An arthroscopic technique for anterior stabilization of the shoulder with a bioabsorbable tack. J Bone Joint Surg Am1996
  3. 78(12):1801-1807. 10.2106/00004623-199612000-00002 3. Spoliti M. Glenoid osteolysis after arthroscopic labrum repair with a bioabsorbable suture anchor. Acta Orthop Belg. 2007
  4. 73(1):107-110. 4. Takubo Y, Morihara T, Namura T, et al. Anchor hole enlargement after arthro- scopic Bankart repair using absorbable suture anchors: A report of three cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008
  5. 17(6):e16–18. 10.1016/j.jse.2008.02.014 5. Visscher LE, Jeffery C, Gilmour T, Anderson L, Couzens G. The history of suture anchors in orthopaedic surgery. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2018
  6. j.clinbiomech.2018.11.008 6. Micic I, Kholinne E, Kwak JM, Koh KH, Jeon IH. Osteolysis is observed around both bioabsorbable and nonabsorbable anchors on serial magnetic resonance images of patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019
  7. 53(6):414-419. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.08.015 7. Milewski MD, Diduch DR, Hart JM, et al. Bone replacement of fast-absorbing biocomposite anchors in arthroscopic shoulder labral repairs. Am J Sports Med. 2012
  8. 40(6):1392-1401. 10.1177/0363546512441589 8. Athwal GS, Shridharani SM, O’Driscoll SW. Osteolysis and arthropathy of the shoulder after use of bioabsorbable knotless suture anchors. A report of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006
  9. 88(8):1840-1845. 10.2106/00004623- 200608000-00023 9. Barber FA, Herbert MA. All-suture anchors: Biomechanical analysis of pullout strength, displacement, and failure mode. Arthroscopy. 2017
  10. 33(6):1113-1121. 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.09.031 10. Tompane T, Carney J, Wu WW, et al. Glenoid bone reaction to all-soft suture anchors used for shoulder labral repairs. J Bone Joint Surg Am.2018
  11. 100 (14):1223-1229. 10.2106/JBJS.17.01169 11. Barvencik F, Gebauer M, Beil FT, et al. Age- and sex-related changes of humeral head microarchitecture: Histomorphometric analysis of 60 human specimens. J Orthop Res. 2010
  12. 28(1):18-26. 10.1002/jor.20957 12. Kim SH, Oh JH, Lee OS, Lee HR, Hargens AR. Postoperative imaging of bioabsorbable anchors in rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2014
  13. 42 (3):552-557. 10.1177/0363546513517538 13. Ro K, Pancholi S, Son