Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2022 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2

Estimating the optimal entry point of the antegrade femoral nailing: Previous and novel morphometric measurements

Pages
81–87
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When the parameters of the right and left sides were compared, it was found that; projected neck angle, nail entrance angle, and the differences between true neck angle and nail entrance angle were found significantly different.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This anatomical study aimed to investigate the possible relationships between the proximal femur parameters and verify the optimal entry point in line with the medullary canal.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Both in single image series and 3D-MPR views, 63 femur bones were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When the parameters of the right and left sides were compared, it was found that; projected neck angle, nail entrance angle, and the differences between true neck angle and nail entrance angle were found significantly different.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This anatomical study aimed to investigate the possible relationships between the proximal femur parameters and verify the optimal entry point in line with the medullary canal. Methods: Both in single image series and 3D-MPR views, 63 femur bones were evaluated. One-millimeter multidetector computed tomog- raphy scans were collected and assessed by OsiriX-Lite version 8 and Horos v3.3.5. Entry point locations, projected and true femoral neck-shaft, anteversion, and newly defined nail entrance angles were measured. Results: The entry points of 16 femurs were placed at the tip of the greater trochanter, and the remaining 47 femurs were in the tro- chanteric fossa (i.e., piriformis fossa). Thirty-three of the entry points found in the trochanteric fossa were overlapped by the greater trochanter. When the parameters of the right and left sides were compared, it was found that; projected neck angle, nail entrance angle, and the differences between true neck angle and nail entrance angle were found significantly different. The relationship between nail entrance angle and entry point localization was assessed, and the probability of the entry point being at the tip of the greater trochanter is 63 times greater when the NEA is below 90. Conclusion: This study has demonstrated that the ideal entry point for straight nails, which is based on the anatomic axis of the femur, is found mainly at the trochanteric fossa, and the greater trochanter overlapped 70.21% of them.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özsoy, H., Hayran, M., Ilgaz, H. B., Güneş, B. E., Çiledağ, N., Demiryürek, D. (2022). Estimating the optimal entry point of the antegrade femoral nailing: Previous and novel morphometric measurements. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2, 81–87. https://ajindex.com/articles/427965

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Bozkurt M, Gursoy S, Shohat N, Simsek ME, Akkaya M, Parvizi J. Definition of a novel proximal femur classification in the sagittal plane according to the femur morphometric analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2019
  2. 34(7):1502-1508. [CrossRef] 2. Toogood PA, Skalak A, Cooperman DR. Proximal femoral anatomy in the nor- mal human population. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009
  3. 467(4):876-885. [CrossRef] 3. Byun YS, Jung GH. Three-dimensional correlation between trochanteric fossa and the ideal entry point for antegrade femoral nailing. Injury. 2016
  4. 47(11):2539- 2543. [CrossRef] 4. Gausepohl T, Pennig D, Koebke J, Harnoss S. Antegrade femoral nailing: an anatomical determination of the correct entry point. Injury. 2002
  5. 33(8):701- 705. [CrossRef] 5. Isaac B, Vettivel S, Prasad R, Jeyaseelan L, Chandi G. Prediction of the femoral neck-shaft angle from the length of the femoral neck. Clin Anat. 1997
  6. 10(5):318- 323. [CrossRef] 6. Ansari Moein CM, Gerrits PD, ten Duis HJ. Trochanteric fossa or piriform fossa of the femur: time for standardised terminology? Injury. 2013
  7. 44(6):722-725. [CrossRef] 7. Ansari Moein CM, Verhofstad MH, Bleys RL, van der Werken C. Soft tissue injury related to choice of entry point in antegrade femoral nailing: piriform fossa or greater trochanter tip. Injury. 2005
  8. 36(11):1337-1342. [CrossRef] 8. Suero EM, Westphal R, Citak M, et al. Robotic technique improves entry point alignment for intramedullary nailing of femur fractures compared to the con- ventional technique: a cadaveric study. J Robot Surg. 2018
  9. 12(2):311-315. [CrossRef] 9. Starr AJ, Hay MT, Reinert CM, Borer DS, Christensen KC. Cephalomedullary nails in the treatment of high-energy proximal femur fractures in young patients: a prospective, randomized comparison of trochanteric versus piri- formis fossa entry portal. J Orthop Trauma. 2006
  10. 20(4):240-246. [CrossRef] 10. Zhao JX, Su XY, Zhao Z, et al. Predicting the optimal entry point for femoral antegrade nailing using a new measurement approach. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015
  11. 10(10):1557-1565. [CrossRef] 11. Anastopoulos G, Chissas D, Dourountakis J, et al. Computer-assisted three- dimensional correlation between the femoral neck-shaft angle and the optimal entry point for antegrade nailing. Injury. 2010
  12. 41(3):300-305. [CrossRef] 12. Khan AA, Asari MA, Hassan A. Anatomic variants of foramen ovale and spi- nosum in human skulls. Int J Morphol. 2012
  13. 30(2):445-449. [CrossRef] 13. Ansari Moein CM, Ten Duis HJ, Oey PL, de Kort GA, van der Meul