Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4

Wet flue gas desulfurization processes

Yaş baca gazı desülfürizasyon yöntemler

Pages
187–194
Publication Date
2013-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this article, various wet flue gas desulfurization processes such as lime/limestone have beendiscussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The wet flue gas desulfurization process is widely used for the treatment of exhaust gases in power stations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Its high SO2 removal efficiency, wide applicability of absorption chemicals and the ease of the chemical process handling which does not require comprehensive konowledge are among the main advantages of this process.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this article, various wet flue gas desulfurization processes such as lime/limestone have beendiscussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yaş baca gazı desülfürizasyonu · FGD · SO2 absorpsiyonu

Abstract

The wet flue gas desulfurization process is widely used for the treatment of exhaust gases in power stations. Due to its high level of effectiveness over the already available processes, it has also been the mostly preferred method by industry. Its high SO2 removal efficiency, wide applicability of absorption chemicals and the ease of the chemical process handling which does not require comprehensive konowledge are among the main advantages of this process. In this article, various wet flue gas desulfurization processes such as lime/limestone have beendiscussed.

Özet

Yaş baca gazı desülfürizasyon prosesi, güç santrallerinin atık gaz muamelerinde geniş çapta kullanılmaktadır. Kullanılan birçok proses arasında en etkili proses olduğundan, bu proses işletmeler tarafından tercih edilmektedir. Yüksek SO2 geri kazanımı, absorpsiyon kimyasallarının geniş uygulanabilirliği ve kimyasal prosesin yönetiminde büyük çapta bir bilgiye gerek duyulmaması bu prosesin avantajları arasında yer almaktadır. Bu yayında başta kireç/kireç taşı prosesi olmak üzere çeşitli yaş baca gazı desülfürizasyon proseslerinden bahsedilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çavuşoğlu, H., Gülaboğlu, M. Ş. (2013). Wet flue gas desulfurization processes. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4, 187–194. https://ajindex.com/articles/42782

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Müezzinoğlu, A., Hava Kirliliği ve Kontrolünün Esasları, Dokuz Eylül Üniv. Yayınları, No: 0908, İzmir, 1987.
  2. Biswal, K. C. and Roy, G. K., “Sulphur Dioxide Pollution Control by Wet Scrubbing Methods”, Reprinted from the Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India), 62, 120- 126, 1982.
  3. Hamm, V. H. and Hüller, R., “Das zweistufige Knauf- Research-Cottrell-Verfahren entschwefelung am Beispiel des Kraftwerkes Franken”, Zement-Kalk-Gips, 6, 313-317, 1982.
  4. Rauchgas Gutberlet, V.H., “Gips aus der Rauchgas-entschwefelung”, VGB Kraftwerkstechnık, 63 (4), 335-344, 1983.
  5. Kaminsky, W., “Verfahren zur Enstschwefelung von Rauchgas”, Chem.-Ing.-Tech, 55 (9), 667-683, 1983.
  6. Kohl, A. and Nielsen, R., “Gas Purification”, Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, Texas, 469-603, 1997.
  7. Mohn, U., “Steinmüller–Rauchgasent-schwefelung”, VDI- Berichte 495, 83-89, 1984.
  8. Schönbucher, B., “Rauchgasentschwe-felungsanlagen im Kraftwerk Heilbronn”, VDI-Berichte, 495, 93-100, 1984.
  9. Lunt, R. R., Little, A. D. and Cunic, J. D., “Profiles in Flue Gas Desulfurization”, AIChe, New York. 1-140, 2000.
  10. Ramachandran, P.A. and Sharma, M. M., “Absorption with Fas Reaction in a Slurry Containing Sparingly Soluble Fine Particles”, Chemical Enginerring Science, 24, 1681-1689, 1969.
  11. Uchida, S. and Wen, C. Y., “Rate of Gas Absorption into a Slurry Accompanied by Instantaneous Reaction”, Chemical Enginerring Science, 32, 1277-1281, 1977.
  12. Bjerle, I., Bengtsson, S. and Farnkvist, K., “Absorption of SO2 in CaCO3-slurry in a laminar jet absorber”, Chemical Engineering Science, 27, 1853-1861, 1972.
  13. Sada, E., Kumazawa, H. And Nishimura, H., “Absorption of Sulfur Dioxide into Aqueous Double Slurries Containing Limestone and Magnesium Hydroxide”, AIChE Journal, 29 (1), 60-64, 1983.
  14. Takashina, T., Honjo, S., Ukawa, N. and Oishi, T., “Effect of Limestone Concentration and Particle Size on SO2 Absorption in Wet FGD Process”, Journal Chemical Engineering of Japan, 34, 810-818, 2001.
  15. Takashina, T., Honjo, S., Ukawa, N. and Iwashita, K., “Effect of Ammonium Concentration on SO2 Absorption in Wet FGD Process”, Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 35, 197-204, 2002.
  16. Gutberlet, V.H. “Zum Leistungsvermögen der nassen Rauchgasentschwefelung für Steinkohle-feuerungen” VGB Kraftwerkstechnık, 63 (12), 1073- 177, 1983.
  17. Rem, R., Shi, F., Huang, X. and Jiang, D. 2011. Application of Additives to the Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization. ICETCE 2011–Proceedings. 1037-1040. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), “Flue Gas Desulfurization