SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Acta Aquatica Turcica / 2019 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4

Length-Weight and Length-Length Relationships of Red Scorpionfish (Scorpaena scrofa L. 1758) from İzmir Bay (Aegean Sea)

İzmir Körfezi (Ege Denizi)’nden Lipsoz (Scorpaena scrofa L. 1758)’un Boy-Ağırlık ve Boy-Boy İlişkisi

Selin ARSLAN
Derya BOSTANCI
Pages
433–439
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study is helpful in providinginformation about length-weight and length-length relationships and the current study can be useful to compare stocks of thespecies in the different habitats

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the length-weight and length-length relationships were investigated for Scorpaena scrofa from İzmir Bay.All fish sample lengths and weights were recorded to the nearest 0.01 cm and to 0.01 g.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The measured total length values forfemales, males and combined sexes were 16.00-30.20 cm; 17.70-28.00 cm and 16.00-30.20 cm respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study is helpful in providinginformation about length-weight and length-length relationships and the current study can be useful to compare stocks of thespecies in the different habitats
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the length-weight and length-length relationships were investigated for Scorpaena scrofa from İzmir Bay.All fish sample lengths and weights were recorded to the nearest 0.01 cm and to 0.01 g. The measured total length values forfemales, males and combined sexes were 16.00-30.20 cm; 17.70-28.00 cm and 16.00-30.20 cm respectively. The weightvalues for females, males and combined sexes were 73.20-441.00 g; 89.80-378.00 g and 73.20-441.00 g respectively.According to t test results, there were no statistically significant differences for S. scrofa species (P˃0.05); therefore, femaleand male samples were evaluated together. The length-weight relationship equations as W=0.016TL2.993 (r²=0.914) for allspecimens. The ‘b’ value of LWR was not significantly different from 3.0 and their growth type was isometric. Total lengthstandard length relationship equation was determined as TL=1.287SL+0.112 (r²=0.970). This study is helpful in providinginformation about length-weight and length-length relationships and the current study can be useful to compare stocks of thespecies in the different habitats

Özet

Bu çalışmada, İzmir Körfezi’nden Scorpaena scrofa’nın boy-ağırlık ve boy-boy ilişkisi incelenmiştir. Tüm örneklerin boyları ve ağırlıkları 0.01cm ve 0.01 g hassasiyetle ölçülmüştür. Dişi, erkek ve tüm bireylerde ölçülen total boy değerleri sırasıyla 16,00-30,20 cm; 17,70-28,00 cm ve16,00-30,20 cm’dir. Ağırlık değerleri ise 73,20-441,00 g; 89,80-378,00 g and 73,20-441,00 g’dır. S. scrofa türü için, t-test sonuçlarına göre önemli bir farklılık olmadığından dişi ve erkek örnekler birlikte değerlendirilmiştir. Tüm bireyler için boy-ağırlık ilişki denklemi W=0,016TL2,993 (r²=0,914) olarak hesaplanmıştır. Boyağırlık ilişkisinin ‘b’ değeri, 3’den önemli derecede farklı değildir, ve türün büyümesi izometriktir. Total boy standart boy ilişki denklemi TL=1,287SL+0,112 (r²=0,970) olarak belirlenmiştir. Bu çalışma, boy-ağırlık ve boy-boy ilişkileri hakkında bilgi sağlamada faydalıdır ve mevcut çalışma, türlerin farklı habitatlardaki stoklarını karşılaştırmak için kullanışlı olabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, S., BOSTANCI, D. (2022). Length-Weight and Length-Length Relationships of Red Scorpionfish (Scorpaena scrofa L. 1758) from İzmir Bay (Aegean Sea). Acta Aquatica Turcica, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4, 433–439. https://ajindex.com/articles/427497

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Altın, A., Ayyıldız, H., Kale, S., & Alver, C. (2015). Length-weight relationships of forty-nine fish species from shallow waters of Gökçeada Island, northern Aegean Sea. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 39, 971- 975. Bagenal, T.B., & Tesch, F.W. (1978). Age and Growth. In T. Bagenal (Ed), Methods for assessment of fish production in fresh waters, 3rd ed: IBP Handbook No.3, Blackwell Science Publications, Oxford. Bostanci, D., Yedier, S., Kontaş, S., Kurucu, G., & Polat, N. (2017). Length-weight, length-length relationships and condition factors of some fish species in Yalıköy Stream (Ordu-Turkey). Aquaculture Studies, 17, 375-383.
  2. Cengiz, Ö. (2013). Length-weight relationships of 22 fish species from the Gallipoli Peninsula and Dardanelles (Northeastern Mediterranean, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Zoology, 37, 419-422. Crec’hriou, R., Neveu, R., & Lenfant, P. (2012). Length-weight relationship of main commercial fishes from the French Catalan coast. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 28, 861-862.
  3. Dulcic J., Jug-Dujakovic, J., Bartulovic, V., Glamuzina, B., Haskovic, E., & Skaramuca, B. (2007). Embryonic and larval development of largescaled scorpionfish Scorpaena scrofa (Scorpaenidae). Cybium, 31(4), 465-470. Dulčić, J., & Kraljević, M. (1996). Weight-length relationships for 40 fish species in the eastern Adriatic (Croatian waters). Fisheries Research, 28, 243-251.
  4. Ferreira, S., Sousa, R., Delgado, J., Carvalho, D., & Chada, T. (2008). Weight-length relationships for demersal fish species caught off the Madeira archipelago (eastern-central Atlantic). Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 24, 93–95.
  5. Froese, R., & Pauly, D. (1998). Fishbase 1998: concepts, design and data sources. ICLARM, Manila. Froese, R. (2006). Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: History, meta analysis and recommendations. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22, 241-253.
  6. Froese, R., & Pauly, D. (2019). Fishbase. World Wide Web Electronic Publication, www.fishbase.org. Accessed 12 February 2019.
  7. Hureau, J.C., & Litvinenko, N.I. (1986). Scorpaenidae. In: P.J.P. Whitehead, M.L. Bauchot, J.C. Hureau, J. Nielsen and E. Tortonese (eds.): Fishes of the North-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean, Vol. III, pp. 1211-1229.
  8. UNESCO, Paris. Karachle, P.K., Başusta, A., Başusta, N., Bostancı, D., Buz, K., Girgin, H., Chater, I., Kokokiris, L., Kontaş, S., Ktari, M.-H., Maravelias, C.T., Minos, G., Özer,E.I., Romdhani, A., Tiralongo, F., Tibullo, D., Tserpes, G., & Vasilakopoulos, P. (2015). Ne