Journals / Abant Tıp Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Investigating of Aortic Diameter affect on Mortality in Type 2 Diabetic Patients after Coronary Surgery: in our clinic experience

Tip 2 diyabetik hastalarda koroner cerrahi sonrası, aortik çapın mortalite üzerine etkisinin araştırılması: klinik deneyimimiz

Pages
167–173
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: There was no significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2 patients in terms of mortality rates after CABG 2/72 vs. 4/83, p=0.686 .

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To compare the patients with a sinotubular junction diameter SJD in the upper percentile and those with a SJD in the lower percentile in terms of the mortality rates following coronary artery bypass grafting CABG among type 2 diabetic patients with a SJD within the normal limits who had no valvular pathology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: One hundred and fifty-five type 2 diabetic patients with an ascending aorta diameter below the surgical limit 3.1 cm constituted Group 2.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: There was no significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2 patients in terms of mortality rates after CABG 2/72 vs. 4/83, p=0.686 .
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tip 2 Diyabet · Koroner Arter Bypas Greftleme · Torasik Aorta

Abstract

Objective: To compare the patients with a sinotubular junction diameter SJD in the upper percentile and those with a SJD in the lower percentile in terms of the mortality rates following coronary artery bypass grafting CABG among type 2 diabetic patients with a SJD within the normal limits who had no valvular pathology. Method: One hundred and fifty-five type 2 diabetic patients with an ascending aorta diameter below the surgical limit 3.1 cm constituted Group 2. Deaths within 30 days following the surgery were included in the study. Results: Two patients in Group 1, four patients in Group 2 died. The causes of death were massive ischemic encephalopathy in one patient, multi-organ failure in three patients, and low cardiac output syndrome in two patients. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2 patients in terms of mortality rates after CABG 2/72 vs. 4/83, p=0.686 .

Özet

Amaç: Valvüler patolojisi olmayan normal sınırlarda kabul edilen aortik sinotubular junctional çap SJD ' a sahip Tip 2 diyabetik hastalarda, SJD' si üst elli persentilde kalanlar ile alt elli persentilde kalanların, Koroner arter bypas greft operasyonu KABGO sonrasında görülen mortalitelerindeki farkın istatiksel anlamlığı araştırıldı. Yöntem: : Ocak 2008 – Ağustos 2011 tarihleri arasında, Kalp ve Damar Cerrahisi KVC Kliniğinde, Assending aorta çapı cerrahi sınırın altında olan

🔖

Cite This Article

AYGÜN, F. (2022). Investigating of Aortic Diameter affect on Mortality in Type 2 Diabetic Patients after Coronary Surgery: in our clinic experience. Abant Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 167–173. https://ajindex.com/articles/427118

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Lakatta EG, Levy D. Arterial and cardiac aging: major shareholders in cardiovascular disease enter- prises: part I: aging arteries: a “set up” for vascular disease. Circulation 2003; 107: 139-46.
  2. Lakatta EG, Mitchell JH, Pomerance A, Rowe GG. Human aging: changes in structure and function. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 10(2 Suppl A ):42-7.
  3. Nichols WW, O’Rourke MF. McDonald’s Blood Flow in Arteries. 5th edition. London: Arnold; 2005. O’Rourke MF, Nichols WW. Aortic diameter, aor- tic stiffness, and wave reflection increase with age and isolated systolic hypertension. Hypertension;45:652-8. Kuller LH. Stroke and diabetes. Diabetes in Amer- ica. 2th edition. Bethesda: The National Diabetes Information Clearinghouse (NDIC) of NIDDK; 1995.
  4. Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R, Edwards FH, Ewy GA, Gardner TJ, et al. guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American Colloge of Cardi- ology/American Heart Association task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Sur- gery). Circulation 2004;110:340-437.
  5. Liotta D, Cooley DA, del Rio M, Safi HJ, Cabrol C, Pham SM, et al. A practical Textbook of Congenital and Acquired Diseases of the Aorta. Intelligent De- sign Aortic Root: Anatomy and Physiology. 2nd edition. University of Morón; 2003.
  6. Van Der Linden J, Bergman P, Hadjinikolaou L. The topography of aortic atherosclerosis enhances its precision as a predictor of stroke. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83: 2087-92.
  7. Acartürk E, Ozeren A, Sanca Y. Detection of aortic plaques by transesophageal echocardiography in patients with ischemic stroke. Acta Neurol Scand; 92: 170-2.
  8. Olson LJ, Subramanian R, Edwards WD. Surgical pathology of pure aortic insufficiency: a study of cases. Mayo Clin Proc 1984; 59: 835-41.
  9. Franklin SS, Gustin Wt, Wong ND, Larson MG, Weber MA, Kannel WB, Levy D. Hemodynamic pat- terns of age-related changes in blood pressure. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 1997; 96: 308 Franklin SS, Jacobs MJ, Wong ND, L’Italien GJ, Lapuerta P. Predominance of isolated systolic hy- pertension among middle-aged and elderly US hy- pertensives: analysis based on National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III. Hyper- tension 2001; 37: 869-74.
  10. Mitchell GF, Pfeffer MA. Pulsatile hemodynam- ics in hypertension. Curr Opin Cardiol 1999; 14: 361- ACC/AHA 2004
  11. Dart AM, Kingwell BA. Pulse pressure–a review of mechanisms and clinical relevance. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 975-84. La