Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 7

Defect Detection of Velvet Bathrobe Fabrics and Grading with Demerit Point Systems

Bornozluk Kadife Kumaşların Hata Kontrolü ve Hata Puan Sistemlerine Göre Sınıflandırılması

Pages
288–295
Publication Date
2016-01-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Disputes can be avoided with classification made by a demerit point system on which manufacturer and the customer have agreed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Fabric defects that may occur at different stages of woven terry fabric production requires quality control and classification of fabrics as first or second grade before sending to customer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, before shipping of two different terry fabric orders, defects were detected by inspection of fabric rolls on a lighted control board by experienced experts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Disputes can be avoided with classification made by a demerit point system on which manufacturer and the customer have agreed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dokuma · Kumaş · Bornoz

Abstract

Fabric defects that may occur at different stages of woven terry fabric production requires quality control and classification of fabrics as first or second grade before sending to customer. In this study, before shipping of two different terry fabric orders, defects were detected by inspection of fabric rolls on a lighted control board by experienced experts. Number of the defects and dimensions of the defects seen during the inspection were noted on quality control charts. Detected defects were defined and scored according to different demerit point systems. In this way, the fabric rolls were classified according to the demerit point systems before being shipped to garment enterprises. Disputes can be avoided with classification made by a demerit point system on which manufacturer and the customer have agreed.

Özet

Bornozluk dokuma kumaşlarda üretimin farklı aşamalarında oluşabilen kumaş hataları, kumaşların müşteriye gönderilmeden önce kontrol edilerek birinci veya ikinci kalite olarak sınıflandırılmasını gerektirmektedir. Bu çalışmada, iki farklı sipariş için üretilen bornozluk kadife kumaş yüklemeleri öncesi, ışıklı panoda deneyimli kalite kontrol elemanları tarafından kumaş toplarının hata kontrolü yapılmıştır. Kontrol sırasında görülen farklı hataların sayıları ve hata boyutları kalite kontrol kartlarına işlenmiştir. Tespit edilen hataların tanımları yapılmış ve kumaş hataları farklı hata puan sistemlerine göre puanlandırılmıştır. Bu sayede kumaş topları konfeksiyon işletmesine sevk edilmeden önce hata puan sistemlerine göre sınıflandırılmıştır. Üretici ve müşterinin üzerinde anlaşmaya vardığı bir hata puan sistemine göre yapılan sınıflandırma sayesinde anlaşmazlıkların önüne geçilebilecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALA, D. M., İKİZ, Y. (2016). Defect Detection of Velvet Bathrobe Fabrics and Grading with Demerit Point Systems. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 7, 288–295. https://ajindex.com/articles/42664

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Mehta PV, Bhardwaj SK. Managing Quality in the Apparel Industry. 1st ed. New Delhi, India. New Age International Ltd. 1998.
  2. Türk Standartları Enstitüsü. “Dokuma Kumaşlar Hata Tarifleri-Terimler”. Türk Standartları Enstitüsü, Ankara,
  3. Türkiye, TS 471 ISO 8498, 2005.
  4. Bona M. Textile Quality. Manchester, United Kingdom, The Textile Institute, 1994.
  5. ASTM Standard. “Standard Terminology Relating to Fabric Defects”. ASTM International, Pennsylvania, USA. ASTM D3990-99, 1999.
  6. British Standard. “Glossary of Terms for Defects in Woven Fabrics”. British Standard Institution, London, UK. BS 7342:1990, ISO8498:1989, 1990.
  7. Çelik Hİ, Dülger LC, Topalbekiroğlu M. “Görüntü İşleme Teknikleri Kullanarak Kumaş Hatalarının Belirlenmesi”. Tekstil Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi, 6(1), 22-39, 2012.
  8. Hu MC, Tsai IS. “The Inspection of Fabric Defects by Using Wavelet Transform”. Journal of Textile Institute, 91(3), 420-433, 1991.
  9. Kumar A. “Computer Vision-Based Fabric Defect Detection: A Survey”. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 55(1), 348-363, 2008.
  10. Kısaoğlu ÖD. “Kumaş Kalite Kontrol Sistemleri”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 12(2), 233-241, 2006.
  11. Tsai I, Lin C, Lin J. “Applying an Artificial Neural Network to Pattern Recognition in Fabric Defects”. Textile Research Journal, 65(3), 123-130, 1995.
  12. Özdemir S, Erçil A. “Markov Random Fields and KarhunenLoève Transforms for Defect Inspection of Textile Products”. Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, 1996. EFTA '96. Proceedings, 1996
  13. IEEE Conference on. Kauai, Hawaii, 18-21 November, 1996.
  14. Conci A, Proença CB. “A Fractal Image Analysis System for Fabric Inspection Based on Box-Counting Method”. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30(20-21), 1887–1895, 1998.
  15. İkiz, Y, Ala DM. “Digitizing and Classifying Woven Fabric Defects”. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon Dergisi, (4), 346-353, 2012. A. Conci and C. B. Proença, “A Computer Vision Approach for Textile Inspection”. Textile Research Journal, 70(4), 347-350, 2000.
  16. Bodnarova A, Bennamoun M, Kubik KK. “Defect Detection in Textile Materials Based on Aspects of HVS”. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, San Diego, California, USA, 11-14 October 1998.
  17. Cho CS, Chung BM, Park MJ. “Development of Real-Time Vision-Based Fabric Inspection System”. IEEE Transactions Industrial Electronics, 52(4), 1073-1079, 2005.
  18. Mallick-Goswami B, Datta AK. “Detecting Defects in Fabric with Laser-Based Morphological Image Processing”. Textile Research Jo