SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

Presence of listeria monocytogenes in some meat products consumed in Van

Van'da tüketime sunulan bazı et ürünlerinde listeria monocytogenes varlığı

Özgür İŞLEYİCİ
Emrullah SAĞUN
Yakup Can SANCAK
Pages
93–99
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In term of motile Aeromonas incidence difference between fish species and Pearl Mullets (Chalcalburnus tarichi, Pallas 1811), fresh water fish or sea fish was not significance statistically.In conclusion, it constated that contaminated with motile Aeromonas species fish sold in Van city could be caused potential risk for public health.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This investigation was conducted to determine the presence and prevalence of motile Aeromonas species in fish consumed in Van city.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study; of 50 samples fish belonging to difficult species retailed in Van city and were investigated fillet and intestinal content for motile Aeromonas species.27 of 50 fillets (54.0%) were found to be positive in terms of motile Aeromonas species; 19 (38.0%) of them were A. hydrophila, 6 (12.0%) were A. caviae and was not found in any samples A. sobria. 2 of 50 fillet samples (4.0%) both A. hydrophila and A. caviae were determined. 26 of 50 intestinal content samples (52.0%) were found to be positive for motile Aeromonas species; 23 (46.0%) of them were A. hydrophila, 2 (4.0%) were A. caviae. 1 of 50 intestinal content samples (2.0%) both A. hydrophila and A. sobria were determined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In term of motile Aeromonas incidence difference between fish species and Pearl Mullets (Chalcalburnus tarichi, Pallas 1811), fresh water fish or sea fish was not significance statistically.In conclusion, it constated that contaminated with motile Aeromonas species fish sold in Van city could be caused potential risk for public health.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:50 samples
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This investigation was conducted to determine the presence and prevalence of motile Aeromonas species in fish consumed in Van city. In this study; of 50 samples fish belonging to difficult species retailed in Van city and were investigated fillet and intestinal content for motile Aeromonas species.27 of 50 fillets (54.0%) were found to be positive in terms of motile Aeromonas species; 19 (38.0%) of them were A. hydrophila, 6 (12.0%) were A. caviae and was not found in any samples A. sobria. 2 of 50 fillet samples (4.0%) both A. hydrophila and A. caviae were determined. 26 of 50 intestinal content samples (52.0%) were found to be positive for motile Aeromonas species; 23 (46.0%) of them were A. hydrophila, 2 (4.0%) were A. caviae. 1 of 50 intestinal content samples (2.0%) both A. hydrophila and A. sobria were determined. In term of motile Aeromonas incidence difference between fish species and Pearl Mullets (Chalcalburnus tarichi, Pallas 1811), fresh water fish or sea fish was not significance statistically.In conclusion, it constated that contaminated with motile Aeromonas species fish sold in Van city could be caused potential risk for public health. To minimize this risk; it must be strict control fish in respect of hygienic quality and even train consumers treatment with heat enough fish and cross contamination.

Özet

Bu araştırma, Van’da tüketime sunulan balıklarda hareketli Aeromonas’ların varlığını ve yaygınlığını belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Çalışmada; Van’da satışa sunulan değişik türlere ait 50 balık örneğinin kas dokuları ve bağırsak içerikleri hareketli Aeromonas’ların varlığı yönünden incelenmiştir.Çiğ balık eti örneklerinin 27 (%54.0)’si hareketli Aeromonas spp. yönünden pozitif bulunmuş, 19 (%38.0) örnekten A.hydrophila, 6 (%12.0) örnekten A. caviae, 2 (%4.0) örnekten de hem A. hydrophila hem de A. caviae birlikte izole edilmiş, hiçbir örnekte A. sobria saptanmamıştır. Çiğ balıkların bağırsak içeriklerinin 26 (%52.0)’sı hareketli Aeromonas türleri yönünden pozitif bulunmuş, 23 (%46.0) örnekten A. hydrophila, 2 (%4.0) örnekten A. caviae ve 1 (%2.0) örnekten de A. hydrophila ve A. sobria birlikte izole edilmiştir.Hareketli Aeromonas insidensi yönünden balık türleri arasında ve inci kefali (Chalcalburnus tarichi, Pallas 1811), tatlı su balıkları ve deniz balıkları arasında istatistiksel olarak önemli bir fark bulunamamıştır.Araştırma sonucunda; Van’da satılan çiğ balıkların hareketli Aeromonas spp. yönünden potansiyel bir tehlike oluşturdukları, bu tehlikenin en az düzeye indirilebilmesi için balıkların hijyenik kontrollerinin titizlikle yapılması gerektiği, tüketicilerin de yeterli ısı işlemi uygulanması ve çapraz kontaminasyonlar gibi konularda bilgilendirilmelerinin gerekli olduğu ortaya konmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

İŞLEYİCİ, Ö., SAĞUN, E., SANCAK, Y. C. (2022). Presence of listeria monocytogenes in some meat products consumed in Van. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 93–99. https://ajindex.com/articles/426207

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alisarlı M, Atasever M, Gökmen M (2005): Contamination of some vacuum-packaged meat products with Listeria monocytogenes. Acta Alimentaria, 34, (3): 331-334
  2. Amdt G, Feier, U, Goetsch PH, Hamann R, Hildebrandt G, Weiss UH (1991): Simulationsstudie zur auswirkung der laborpraxis auf die MPN schutzung. Vet. Med. Hefte 1/197 Institut für Veterinärmedizin des Bundesgesundheitsamtes. In: Mangold, S., Vorkommen und verhalten von Listerien in tiefgefrorenen. Lebensmitteln., Diss. Vet. Med. F.U. Berlin
  3. Anonymous (1994): Agricultural food products: General guidance for detection of Listeria monocytogenes. ISO/TC 34/SC 9
  4. Arslan A (1990): Et muayenesi ve et ürünleri teknolojisi. Medipress, Malatya, s: 506, 1992
  5. Boyle, DL, Sofos JN, Schmidt GR (1990): Thermal destruction of L. monocytogenes in a meat slurry and ground beef. J. Food Sci. 55:327-329
  6. Bozkurt ENN (2003): Et ve et ürünlerinden Listeria monocytogenes’in izolasyonu. Y.Y.Ü. Saglık Bil. Enst., Doktora Tezi, 59 s
  7. Bredholt S, Nesbakken T, Holck A (1999): Protective cultures inhibit growth of Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in cooked, sliced, vacuum- and gas-packaged meat. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 53, (1):43-52
  8. Buncic S (1991): The incidence of Listeria monocytogenes in slaughtered animals in meat and in meat products in Yugoslavia. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 12, (2-3):173-80
  9. Cook V (1999): Isolation and identification of Listeria monocytogenes from red meat, poultry, egg and environmental samples. In: USDA/FSIS Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook. 3rd Ed. Revision 2
  10. Çon AH, Kaya M, Gökalp HY (1993): Sucuklardan Listeria monocytogenes ve diger Listeria türlerinin izolasyonu ve identifikasyonu. KÜKEM Derg., 16(2):78
  11. Deumier F, Collignan A (2003): The effects of sodium lactate and starter cultures on pH, lactic acid bacteria, Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella spp. levels in pure chicken dry fermented sausage. Meat Science, 65: 1165-1174
  12. Dhanashree B, Ottab SK, Karunasagarb I, Goebelc W, Karunasagarb I (2003): Incidence of Listeria spp. in clinical and food samples in Mangalore, India. Food Microbiology, 20:447–453
  13. Encinas JP, Sanz JJ, Garcia-Lopez ML, Otero A (1999): Behaviour of Listeria spp. in naturally contaminated chorizo (Spanish Fermented Sausage). Int. J. Food Microbiol., 46, (2):167-71
  14. Erol İ, Çelik TH, Sireli UT, Özdemir H (1999): Bakteriyosin olusturan starter kültürlerin fermente Türk Sucuklarında Listeria monocytogenes üzeri