Journals / Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Serotiplendirilemeyen Grup B Streptokokların biyotiplendirilmesi

Biotyping of nontypeable Group B Streptococci

Pages
121–127
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that these patterns will be a guide for the identification scheme of bovine and human GBS isolates and raised the question if there are new no-named isolates other than Streptococcus agalactiae in GBS?

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study the nontypeable Group B Streptococci (GBS) of bovine and human origin were classified by biochemical techniques.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to serotyping by co-agglutination test using rabbit monospecific serotype antisera, 40 (49.4%) of 81 bovine and 30 (32.3%) of 93 human GBS isolates were found as nontypeable (NT).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that these patterns will be a guide for the identification scheme of bovine and human GBS isolates and raised the question if there are new no-named isolates other than Streptococcus agalactiae in GBS?
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study the nontypeable Group B Streptococci (GBS) of bovine and human origin were classified by biochemical techniques. According to serotyping by co-agglutination test using rabbit monospecific serotype antisera, 40 (49.4%) of 81 bovine and 30 (32.3%) of 93 human GBS isolates were found as nontypeable (NT). The various biochemical properties of NT GBS isolates were statistically analyzed and isolates were classified according to cluster variables. Bovine and human NT isolates were classified in four and three different biotype patterns. It was concluded that these patterns will be a guide for the identification scheme of bovine and human GBS isolates and raised the question if there are new no-named isolates other than Streptococcus agalactiae in GBS?

Özet

Bu araştırmada serotiplendirilemeyen Grup B Streptokok (GBS)’ların biyokimyasal yöntemlerle sınıflandırılması amaçlandı. Sığırlardan izole edilen 81 izolatın 40 (%49.4)’ı ve 93 insan izolatının 30 (%32.3)’u tavşanlardan elde edilen serotip monospesifik antiserumların kullanıldığı koaglütinasyon testi ile serotiplendirilemedi. Serotiplendirilemeyen izolatlardan elde edilen bazı biyokimyasal test sonuçlarının istatistiksel dendogram analizleri yapılarak her biri sınıflandırmaya tabi tutuldu. Sığır orijinli izolatlar 4 farklı biyotipte sınıflandırılırken insan orijinli izolatlarda 3 farklı biyotip saptandı. Araştırma sonucunda elde edilen biyotip modellerinin sığır ve insan orijinli GBS izolatlarının identifikasyonunda yardımcı olabileceği ve GBS kapsamında Streptococcus agalactiae dışında adlandırılmayan başka izolatların da olabileceği kanaatine varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAMAN, G., GURTURK, K., EKIN, I. H., YESILOVA, A. (2022). Serotiplendirilemeyen Grup B Streptokokların biyotiplendirilmesi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 121–127. https://ajindex.com/articles/426202

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ainsworth AJ and Capley G (1986). Monoclonal antibodies produced to Streptococcus agalactiae, Am J Vet Res, 47 (6), 1211-1213.
  2. Christensen P, Kahlmeter G, Jonsson S and Kronvall G (1973). New method for the serological grouping of streptococci with specific antibodies adsorbed to protein a-containing staphylococci. Infect Immun, 7 (6), 881-885.
  3. Carter GR (1984). Diagnostic Procedures in Veterinary Bacteriology and Mycology. 4th Ed, Springfield Illinois. U.S.A. Devriese LA (1991). Streptococcal ecovars associated with different animal species: Epidemiological significance of serogroups and biotypes, J Appl Bacteriol, 71, 478-483.
  4. Duarte RS, Miranda OP, Bellei BC, Brito MAVP, Teixeria LM (2004). Phenotypic and molecular characteristics of Streptococcus agalactiae isolates recovered from milk of dairy cows in Brazil. J Clin Microbiol 42 (9), 4214-4222.
  5. Ekin IH and Gurturk K (2006). Characterization of bovine and human Group B Streptococci Isolated in Turkey. J Med Microbiol 55, 517-521
  6. Facklam R (2002). What happened to the streptococci: Overview of taxonomic and nomenclature changes. J Clin Microbiol, 15 (4), 613-630.
  7. Ferrieri P and Flores AE (1997). Surface protein expression in group B streptococcal invasive isolates, p. 635–637.
  8. In T. Horaud, A. Bouvet, R. Leclercq, H. de Montclos, and M. Sicard (ed.), Streptococci and the host. Proceedings of the 13th Lancefield International Symposium on Streptococci and Streptococcal Diseases. Plenum Press,
  9. New York, N.Y. Finch LA and Martin DR (1984). Human and bovine group B streptococci: Two distinct populations. J Appl Bacteriol, 57, 273-278.
  10. Flores AE and Ferrieri P (1989). Molecular species of R-protein antigens produced by clinical isolates of group B streptococci. J Clin Microbiol 27, 1050–1054.
  11. Gurturk K (1989). Untersuchungen an streptokokken der serologischen gruppe G von hund, rind und mensch unter besonderer breücksichtigung mutmaßlicher pathogenitaetsfaktoren, Fachbereich Veterinärmedizin der Justus – Liebig Universität, GieBen (PhD thesis). Hickman ME, Rench MA, Ferrieri P and Baker CJ (1999). Changing epidemiology of group B streptococcal colonization. Pediatrics 104, 203–209.
  12. Jelinkova J (1977). Group B streptococci in the human population, Curr Top Microbiol Immunol, 76, 127-165.
  13. Kong F, Gowan S, Martin D, James G and Gilbert GL (2002). Serotype identification of group B streptococci by PCR and sequencing. J Clin Microbiol 40, 216-226.
  14. Kong F, Lambertsen LM, Slotved HC, Ko D, Wang H, Gilbert GL (2008)