Journals / Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni / 2018 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1

Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Experience Within Time Period

Belirli Bir Süre İçendeki Total Laparaskopik Histerektomi Deneyimi

Pages
28–30
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After a certain learning curve, the durationof the operation is shortened.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidenceof total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) in our clinic duringthe first 6 months and the last 6 months by a single surgeon.Material and Methods: Eighty-one patients who underwentTLH between January 2016 and December 2016 due to benigndiseases were evaluated retrospectively using age, parity, BMI,indications, length of hospitalization, blood loss, and durationof operation time.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The cases were examined in 2 groups asthe first 6 months (Group 1) and the last 6 months (Group 2).Analysis of the data was done using t test.Results: The mean age for Group 1 was 50,676,60 years, parity2,291,37, and BMI 31,993,84 kg/m2.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After a certain learning curve, the durationof the operation is shortened.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidenceof total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) in our clinic duringthe first 6 months and the last 6 months by a single surgeon.Material and Methods: Eighty-one patients who underwentTLH between January 2016 and December 2016 due to benigndiseases were evaluated retrospectively using age, parity, BMI,indications, length of hospitalization, blood loss, and durationof operation time. The cases were examined in 2 groups asthe first 6 months (Group 1) and the last 6 months (Group 2).Analysis of the data was done using t test.Results: The mean age for Group 1 was 50,676,60 years, parity2,291,37, and BMI 31,993,84 kg/m2. The mean age for Group 2was 53,88.49 years, parity 2,691,44, and BMI 31,863,57 kg/m2.Endometrial hyperplasia (n=42, 51.8%) was the most commonindication for hysterectomy in 81 cases included in the study.The mean length of hospitalization for Group 1 was 2.410.56days, blood loss was 1.070.37 g/dl. The mean length of hospitalizationfor Group 2 was 2.360.56 days and blood loss was1.050.44 g/dl. There was no significant difference in age, parity,BMI, length of hospitalization, and blood loss between thetwo groups as Group 1 and Group 2 (p> 0,05). The operationtime for Group 1 was calculated as 100,2216,64 minutes andthe operation time for Group 2 was calculated as 75,8118,45minutes. When the operation times of Group 1 and Group 2 totallaparoscopic hysterectomies performed by a single surgeonwere compared, it was observed that the operations performedin Group 2 were significantly decreased in duration (p <0,05).Just intraoperative complications developed in group 2. Bladderinjury was repaired as a primer.Conclusion: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy is a safe and convenientmethod for gynecological diseases. Total laparoscopichysterectomy seems safe and effective for many patients afteradequate training. After a certain learning curve, the durationof the operation is shortened.

Özet

Amaç: TBu çalışmanın amacı, kliniğimizde tek bir cerrah tarafından total laparoskopik histerektomi (TLH) yapılan vakaların ilk 6 ay ve son 6 ay süresince değerlendirmek üzere yapılmıştır. Gereçler ve Yöntem: Benign hastalıklar nedeniyle Ocak 2016 ve Aralık 2016 arasında TLH uygulanan 81 olgu yaş, parite, BMI, endikasyon, hastanede kalış süresi, kan kaybı, operasyon süresi parametreleri kullanılarak retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Olgular ilk 6 ay (Grup1) ve son 6 ay (Grup 2) olarak 2 grupta incelenmiştir. Verilerin analizi t test kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Grup 1 için ortalama yaş 50,676,60 yıl, parite 2,291,37, BMI 31,993,84 kg/m2 olarak hesaplandı. Grup 2 için ortalama yaş 53,898,49 yıl, parite 2,691,44, BMI 31,863,57 kg/m2 olarak hesaplandı. Çalışmaya dahil olan 81 olgunun en fazla histerektomi endikasyonu endometrial hiperplazi (n=42, %51,8) olarak geldi. Grup 1 için ortalama hastanede kalış süresi 2,410,56 gün, kan kaybı 1,070,37 g/dl olarak hesaplandı. Grup 2 için ortalama hastanede kalış süresi 2,360,56 gün, kan kaybı 1,050,44 g/dl olarak hesaplandı. Grup 1 ve Grup 2 olarak iki grupta incelenen hastaların yaş, parite, BMI, hastanede kalış süresi, kan kayıpları arasında anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır (p>0,05). Grup 1 için operasyon süresi 100,2216,64 dakika, Grup 2 için operasyon süresi 75,8118,45 dakika olarak hesaplandı. Tek bir cerrahın yaptığı, Grup 1 ve Grup 2 total laparoskopik histerektomilerin operasyon süreleri karşılaştırıldığında ise Grup 2’de yapılan ameliyatların süre olarak anlamlı olarak azaldığı görülmüştür (p<0,05). Tek intraoperatif komplikasyon Grup 2’de gelişti. Mesane yaralanması primer olarak onarıldı. Sonuç: Total laparoskopik histerektomi jinekolojik hastalıklar için güvenli ve uygun bir yöntemdir. Total laparoskopik histerektomi yeterli eğitimin ardından hastalar için birçok açıdan güvenli ve etkin olarak görünmektedir. Belirli bir öğrenim eğrisinden sonra operasyon süresi kısalır.

🔖

Cite This Article

OGE, T., ŞENTÜRK, M. (2022). Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Experience Within Time Period. Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1, 28–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/426189

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Walsh CA, Walsh SR, Tang TY, Slack M. Total abdominal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;144(1):3–7.
  2. Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, et al. Surgical aproach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecologi- cal disease. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev 2009; 8: CD003677. Leonard F, Chopin N, Borghese B, Fotso A, Foulot H, Coste J, et al. Total lapa- roscopic hysterectomy: preoperative risk factors for conversion to laparotomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005;12(4):312–17.
  3. Sokol AI, Chuang K, Milad MP. Risk factors for conversion to laparotomy during gynecologic laparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003;10(4):469–73.
  4. Hasson HM, Rotman C, Rana N, Asakura H.J. Experience with laparoscopic hysterectomy. Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1993 Nov;1(1): 1-11 Süleyman Salman, Yavuz Tahsin Ayanoğlu, Murat Bozkurt, Serkan Kumbasar, Berker Kavşi, Erkin Sertoğlu, Refika Genç Koyucu. Analysis of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Performed in Our Clinic. JAREM 2015; 5: 10-3.
  5. Davies A, Magos AL. Indications and alternatives to hysterectomy. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 11: 61-75.
  6. Terzi H, Kale A, Aydın AY. Kliniğimizde gerçekleştirilen laparoskopik histerektomi olgularının klinik özelliklerinin değerlendirilmesi. Kocaeli Tıp Dergisi 2012; 2: 22-5.
  7. Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr L, Garry R. Met- hods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of rando- mised controlled trials. BMJ 2005; 330: 1478. Mäkinen J, Johansson J, Tomas C, Tomas E, Heinonen PK, Laatikai- nen T, et al. Morbidity of 10 110 hysterectomies by type of approach. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1473-8.
  8. Malik E, Schmidt M, Scheidel P. Complications after 106 laparoscopic hysterectomies. Zentrabl Gynakol 1997; 119: 611-5.