Approach to feeding problems in babies with cleft lip and/or palate

Nutritional interventions such as breastfeeding, modified bottles and/or nipple, occlusive pads and maternal counseling and support are needed, so this article aims to review some nutritional issues and adaptations in this regard.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯

Objective & Hypothesis:Cleft lip and/or palate is one of the most common craniofacial congenital anomalies and is most common in the orofacial region.

📊

Key Findings & Data:The incidence of this congenital anomaly in newborn babies is around 15%.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:Nutritional interventions such as breastfeeding, modified bottles and/or nipple, occlusive pads and maternal counseling and support are needed, so this article aims to review some nutritional issues and adaptations in this regard.

🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey

📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample

⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Cleft lip and/or palate is one of the most common craniofacial congenital anomalies and is most common in the orofacial region. The incidence of this congenital anomaly in newborn babies is around 15%. Although the pathogenesis of these congenital malformations is not fully known, there is evidence that both dietary and genetic factors play a role, and this evidence is increasing day by day. Children with cleft lip and/or palate may be malnourished after birth due to nutritional difficulties. Children with these deformities are often impaired in growth compared to healthy children. A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory for the evaluation of these babies. Feeding newborns with cleft lip and/or palate in the beginning is a major concern for parents. Nutritional interventions such as breastfeeding, modified bottles and/or nipple, occlusive pads and maternal counseling and support are needed, so this article aims to review some nutritional issues and adaptations in this regard.

Özet

Dudak ve/veya damak yarığı en yaygın kraniyofasiyal doğumsal anomalilerden biri olup, en sık orofasiyal bölgede görülür. Yenidoğan bebeklerde bu doğumsal anomalinin görülme sıklığı %15 civarındadır. Bu konjenital malformasyonların patogenenezi tam olarak bilinmemekle beraber, hem beslenme hem de genetik faktörlerin rol oynadığına dair kanıtlar bulunmakta ve bu kanıtlar gün geçtikçe artmaktadır. Dudak ve/veya damak yarığı olan çocuklar, doğumdan sonra beslenme güçlükleri nedeniyle yetersiz beslenebilirler. Bu deformitelere sahip çocukların büyümesi genellikle sağlıklı çocuklara kıyasla bozulmuştur. Bu bebeklerin değerlendirilmesi için multidisipliner bir yaklaşım zorunludur. Başlangıçta dudak ve/veya damak yarığı olan yenidoğanların beslenmesi ebeveynler için büyük bir endişe kaynağıdır. Emzirme, modifiye edilmiş biberonlar ve/veya meme ucu, tıkayıcı plakalar ve anne danışmanlığı ve destek gibi beslenme müdahalelerine ihtiyaç duyulur. Bu yazıda, bu konudaki bazı beslenme sorunlarının ve uyarlamalarının gözden geçirilmesi amaçlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, O. E., PEKCAN, A. G., AKCAN, A. B., SIRIKEN, F., ERTEKİN, A. A., CEYLAN, E. (2022). Approach to feeding problems in babies with cleft lip and/or palate. Zeynep Kamil medical journal (Online), Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 1, 53–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/426176

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

Hoşnuter M, Aktunç E, Kargı E, Ünalacak M, Babucçu O, Demircan N, et al. Yarık damak dudak aile rehberi. Süleyman Demirel Üni. Tıp Fak Derg 2002;9:9−13
Kızılelma Yiğit A, Oğuz ŞS, Dilmen U. Dudak ve damak yarıkları olan vakaların derlenmesi ve büyümelerinin izlemi. Jine - Obste ve Neon Tıp Derg 2015; 12: 80−82
Gillham JC, Anand S, Bullen PJ. Antenatal detection of cleft lip with or without cleft palate: incidence of associated chromosomal and structural anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34:410−5
Türkmen A. Dudak damak yarıklarının sınıflandırılması.Turkiye Klinikleri J PlastSurg-Special Topics 2011;3:33−7
Bekerecioğlu M, Türkmen A. Konjenita yarık damak ve dudak anomalileri. Turkiye Klinikleri J E.N.T.-Special Topics 2011;4:43−7
Öner DA, Taştan H. Cleft lip and palate: Epidemiology and etiology. Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surg 2020;5:1−5
IPDTOC Working Group. Prevalence at birth of cleft lip with or without cleft palate: data from the International Perinatal Database of Typical Oral Clefts (IPDTOC). Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2011;48:66−81
Brito LA, Cruz LA, Rocha KM, Barbara LK, Silva CB, Bueno DF, et al. Genetic contribution for non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NS CL/P) in different regions of Brazil and implications for association studies. Am J Med Genet A 2011;155A:1581−7
Ulucan K, Akçay A, Ersoy B, Kiraç D, Akçay T, Ergeç D et al. Regional dispersion of non-syndromic cleft lip with/without palate Turkish children patients and possible geographical effects. MÜSBED 2012;2:164−68
Lowry RB, Johnson CY, Gagnon F, Little J. Segregation analysis of cleft lip with or without cleft palate in the First Nations (Amerindian) people of British Columbia and review of isolated cleft palate etiologies. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2009;85:568−73
Merritt L. Part 1. Understanding the embryology and genetics of cleft lip and palate. Adv Neonatal Care 2005;5:64−71
Schutte BC, Murray JC. The many faces and factors of orofacial clefts. Hum Mol Genet 1999;8:1853−9
Prescott NJ, Winter RM, Malcolm S. Maternal MTHFR genotype contributes to the risk of non-syndromic cleft lip and palate. J Med Genet 2002;39:368−9
Shkoukani MA, Chen M, Vong A. Cleft lip - a comprehensive review. Front Pediatr 2013;1:53
Clark JD, Mossey PA, Sharp L, Little J. Socioeconomic status and orofacial clefts in Scotland, 1989 to 1998. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2003;40:481−5
Miranda GS, Marques