SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Zeynep Kamil medical journal (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 1

Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Birth Experiences Questionnaire

Fadime BAYRI BİNGÖL
Meltem DEMİRGÖZ BAL
Melike DİŞSİZ
Sümeyye TOKAT
Melek IŞIK
Pages
21–26
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In this study, it was shown that the Turkish version of the scale was valid and reliable.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Birth Experiences Questionnaire.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: This methodological study was carried out with 110 couple who were admitted to a in Istanbul between January and December 2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In this study, it was shown that the Turkish version of the scale was valid and reliable.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Birth Experiences Questionnaire. Material and Methods: This methodological study was carried out with 110 couple who were admitted to a in Istanbul between January and December 2019. This research is a methodological study. This study was conducted with 110 couple who gave birth in a public hospital in Istanbul between January and December 2019. The data of the study were obtained using Personal Information Form and Turkish version of Birth Experiences Questionnaire. Birth Experiences Questionnaire measurements were tested with validity and reliability analyzes. For this purpose, validity analysis of data; scope validity index, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), reliability analysis; Pearson moment product correlation and Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient tests were used. In the evaluation of data, t-test, correlation analysis, Cronbach α analysis, and CFA were used. Results: It is a 10-item self-rating scale. To assess the consistency of the questionnaire overtime, test-retest measurement was performed with an interval of 1 day. As a result, no difference was found between the mean scores (p>0.05). In the analysis conducted for the internal consistency in the reliability study of the Birth Experiences Questionnaire, the Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient all scales was determined for all scales as ∝=0.78 for mothers and ∝=0.86 for fathers. Conclusion: In this study, it was shown that the Turkish version of the scale was valid and reliable.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİNGÖL, F. B., BAL, M. D., DİŞSİZ, M., TOKAT, S., IŞIK, M. (2022). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Birth Experiences Questionnaire. Zeynep Kamil medical journal (Online), Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 1, 21–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/426167

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Saxbe D, Horton KT, Tsai AB. The birth experiences questionnaire: A brief measure assessing psychosocial dimensions of childbirth. J Fam Psychol 2018;32(2):262–8
  2. Weeks F, Pantoja L, Ortiz J, Foster J, Cavada G, Binfa L. Labor and birth care satisfaction associated with medical ınterventions and accompaniment during labor among chilean women. J Midwifery Womens Health 2016;62(2):196–203
  3. Fallon V, Halford JC, Bennett KM, Harrold JA. The postpartum specific anxiety scale: Development and preliminary validation. Arch Womens Ment Health 2016;19(6):1079–90
  4. Ayers S. Birt trauma and post-traumatic stres disorder: The importance of risk and resilience. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2017;35(5):427–30
  5. Yalnız H, Canan F, Genç RE, Kuloğlu, MM, Geçici, Ö. Development of a scale of Traumatic Childbirth Perception. Turk Med J 2016;8(3):81–8
  6. Meltzer-Brody S, Maegbaek ML, Medland SE, Miller WC, Sullivan P, Munk-Olsen T. Obstetrical, pregnancy and socio-economic predictors for new-onset severe postpartum psychiatric disorders in primiparous women. Psychol Med 2017;47(8):1427–41
  7. Bingöl FB, Bal MD. The risk factors for postpartum posttraumatic stres disorder and depression. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2020;56(4):851–7
  8. Gözükara F, Eroğlu K. Factors that effect the choices of primipars on the mode of delivery. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Nursing Journal 2008;15(1):32–46
  9. Edhborg M, Seimyr L, Lundh W, Witstrom AM. Fussy child-difficult parenthood? comparisons between families with a “depressed” mother and non-depressed mother 2 Month postpartum. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2000;18(3):225–38
  10. Cameron EE, Sedov ID, Tomfohr-Madsen LM. Prevalence of paternal depression in pregnancy and the postpartum: An updated meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2016:206:189–203
  11. Koch S, De Pascalis L, Vivian F, Renner AM, Murray L, Arteche A. Effects of male postpartum depression on father-infant interaction: The mediating role of face processing. Infant Ment Health 2019;40(2):263– 76
  12. Ferguson S, Davis D, Browne J. Does antenatal education affect labour and birth? A structured review of the literature. Women Birth 2013;26(1):5–8
  13. Güngör İ, Beji NK. Development and psychometric testing of the scales for measuring maternal satisfaction in normal and caesarean birth. Midwifery 2012;28(3):348–57
  14. Kızılkaya S. Sezaryen ya da Normal Spontan Doğum Yapan Primiparlarda Doğum Deneyiminin Doğum Sonu Yaşam Kalitesine Etkisi. Marmara University, Institute