Journals / Zeynep Kamil medical journal (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 1

Retrospective analysis of surgical site infections after cesarean section: Rates, microbiological profile, and clinical features

Pages
8–16
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In terms of SSI, it is recommended to perform a preoperative risk as- sessment for pregnant women and to show appropriate approaches to risky people.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Surgical site infection (SSI) accounts for 31% of healthcare-associated infections and is associated with a 3% mortality rate.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It increases the frequency of transition to the intensive care unit, the length of hospital stay, and the rate of read- missions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In terms of SSI, it is recommended to perform a preoperative risk as- sessment for pregnant women and to show appropriate approaches to risky people.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Surgical site infection (SSI) accounts for 31% of healthcare-associated infections and is associated with a 3% mortality rate. It increases the frequency of transition to the intensive care unit, the length of hospital stay, and the rate of read- missions. According to the National Health Service-Related Infections Surveillance Network 2017 data, the rate of infection in the surgical field in our country is 0.72%, and this rate is 1.0% in 25 of 60 types of surgery. Obstetric–gynecologic surgeries are in this group. Information on SSI after cesarean section is limited in the international and national literature. Our research is aimed to define the features of C-section SSI and contribute to the solution of the problems observed with the data to be obtained. Material and Methods: A retrospective evaluation of SSIs in patients who underwent C-sections between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020, at Zeynep Kamil Ma- ternity and Children’s Training and Research Hospital was conducted. Results: During the study period, SSI was observed in 191 (2.3%) of 8370 C-section cases, and the mean age of these patients was 30.5±6.3 years. Body mass index was at the level of 32.8±5.2 kg/m 2 and body mass index value was >30 kg/m2 in 88% of the SSI group. Emergency C-section was applied in 145 (75.9%) cases and elective C-section in 46 (24.1%) cases. The skin incisions were closed with multifilament in 174 (91.1%), monofilament in 14 (7.3%), and skin stapler in 3 (1.6%) patients. After the diagnosis of SSI, the povidone iodine dressing was sufficient for wound healing in 184 (96.3%) patients. Secondary healing method was applied to 4 (2.1%) patients and negative pressure wound closure technique was applied to 3 (1.6%) patients. Conclusion: In terms of SSI, it is recommended to perform a preoperative risk as- sessment for pregnant women and to show appropriate approaches to risky people. Providing wound care training to patients at discharge, timely postpartum controls, and standardizing wound care products to be used will increase the success rate.

🔖

Cite This Article

KUMRU, P., AÇAR, S., ÇİFTÇİ, E., YILMAZER, B. (2022). Retrospective analysis of surgical site infections after cesarean section: Rates, microbiological profile, and clinical features. Zeynep Kamil medical journal (Online), Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 1, 8–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/426130

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infec- tions in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 2008;36:309–32
  2. Surgial Site Infection Event (SSI). Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/ nhsn/PDFs/pscManual/9pscSSIcurrent.pdf. Accessed Mar 19, 2019
  3. Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, Leas B, Stone EC, Kelz RR, et al. Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA Surg 2017;152:784–91
  4. Merkow RP, Ju MH, Chung JW, Hall BL, Cohen ME, Williams MV, et al. Underlying reasons associated with hospital readmission following surgery in the United States. JAMA 2015;313:483–95
  5. Lewis SS, Moehring RW, Chen LF, Sexton DJ, Anderson DJ. Assessing the relative burden of hospital-acquired infections in a network of com- munity hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:1229–30
  6. Owens PL, Barrett ML, Raetzman S, Maggard-Gibbons M, Steiner CA. Surgical site infections following ambulatory surgery procedures. JAMA 2014;311:709–16
  7. Anderson DJ, Hartwig MG, Pappas T, Sexton DJ, Kanafani ZA, Auten G, et al. Surgical volume and the risk of surgical site infection in community hospitals: Size matters. Ann Surg 2008;247:343–9
  8. Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, Perl TM, Auwaerter PG, Bolon MK, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2013;14:73–156
  9. Anderson DJ, Podgorny K, Berríos-Torres SI, Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Greene L, et al. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35:605–27 10. Orr JW, Taylor PT. Wound healing. In: Complications in Gynecological Surgery: Prevention, Recognition, and Management. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott; 2018. p.167
  10. Lipscomb, GH, Ling, FG. Wound Healing, Suture Material, and Surgical Instrumentation. In: Rock, JA, Jones, HA, III editors. Te Linde’s Opera- tive Gynecology. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott; 2003. p.233
  11. Hedrick TL, Sawyer RG, Friel CM, Stukenborg GJ. A method for estimat- ing the risk of surgical site infection in patients with abdominal colorectal procedures. Dis Colon Rectum 2013;56:627–37
  12. Dias M, Dick A, Reynolds RM, Lahti-Pulkkinen M, Denison FC. Predic- tors of surgical site skin infection and clinical outcome at caesarean sec- tion in the very severely obese: A retrospect