Journals / 7tepe Klinik / 2021 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

Bioactive resin composites

Biyoaktif kompozit rezinler

Pages
139–147
Publication Date
2022-09-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These studies have promising results for degreasing demineralization, inhibiting secondary caries, neutralizing acid production, ensuring tertiary dentin formation and protecting the pulp.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Nowadays, resin composites are widely used restorative materials due to their esthetic properties.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, polymerization shrinkage, microleakage, discoloration and secondary caries are the most important caueses of failure of resin composites.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These studies have promising results for degreasing demineralization, inhibiting secondary caries, neutralizing acid production, ensuring tertiary dentin formation and protecting the pulp.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Nowadays, resin composites are widely used restorative materials due to their esthetic properties. However, polymerization shrinkage, microleakage, discoloration and secondary caries are the most important caueses of failure of resin composites. Many studies are being conducted on the development of new bioactive materials with remineralization potential and containing antimicrobial agents to overcome these disadvantages. These studies have promising results for degreasing demineralization, inhibiting secondary caries, neutralizing acid production, ensuring tertiary dentin formation and protecting the pulp.

Özet

Günümüzde, kompozit rezinler, estetik özellikleri nedeniyle yaygın olarak kullanılan restoratif materyallerdir. Bununla birlikte; polimerizasyon büzülmesi, kenar sızıntısı, renklenme ve sekonder çürük, kompozit rezinlerin en önemli başarısızlık sebepleri arasında yer almaktadır. Bu olumsuzlukların üstesinden gelmek için, remineralizasyon potansiyeline sahip, antimikrobiyal maddeler içeren yeni bioaktif materyallerin geliştirilmesiyle ilgili pek çok çalışma yapılmaktadır. Bu araştırmalar, demineralizasyonun azaltılması, sekonder çürüklerin engellenmesi, asitlerin nötralize edilmesi, biyofilm oluşumu ve asit üretiminin baskılanması, tersiyer dentin oluşumunun sağlanması ve pulpanın korunması konusunda umut verici sonuçlara sahiptir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çelik, Ç., Özdemir, B. E. (2022). Bioactive resin composites. 7tepe Klinik, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 139–147. https://ajindex.com/articles/426058

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Dayangaç B., Kompozit rezin restorasyonlar. Güneş Kitabevi, Ankara, 2000
  2. Hickel R., Dasch W., Janda R., Tyas M., Anusavice K., New direct restorative materials. Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde, 1999. 106(4): p. 128-140
  3. Deligeorgi V., Mjör I.A., Wilson N.H., An overview of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations. Primary Dental Care, 2001(1): p. 5-11
  4. Sarrett D.C., Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dental materials, 2005. 21(1): p. 9-20
  5. Pereira‐Cenci T., Cenci M.S., Fedorowicz Z., Azevedo M., Antibacterial agents in composite restorations for the prevention of dental caries. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2013(12)
  6. Fedorowicz Z., Marchesan M.A., Cenci M.S., Cenci T.P., Antibacterialagentsin composite restorationsfor the prevention of dentalcaries. 2009
  7. Hamouda I.M., Current perspectives of nanoparticles in medical and dental biomaterials. Journal of biomedical research, 2012. 26(3): p. 143-151
  8. Wiegand A., Buchalla W., Attin T., Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials—fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dental materials, 2007. 23(3): p. 343-362
  9. Xie D., Weng Y., Guo X., Zhao J., Gregory R.L. et al., Preparation and evaluation of a novel glass-ionomer cement with antibacterial functions. Dental Materials, 2011. 27(5): p. 487-496
  10. Bourbia M., Ma D., Cvitkovitch D.G., Santerre J.P., Finer Y., Cariogenic bacteria degrade dental resin composites and adhesives. Journal of dental research, 2013. 92(11): p. 989-994
  11. Svanberg M., Mjör I., Orstavik D., Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite, and glass-ionomer restorations. Journal of dental research, 1990. 69(3): p. 861-864
  12. Beyth N., Bahir R., Matalon S., Domb A.J., Weiss E.I., Streptococcus mutans biofilm changes surface-topography of resin composites. dental materials, 2008. 24(6): p. 732-736
  13. Khalichi P., Singh J., Cvitkovitch D.G., Santerre J.P., The influence of triethylene glycol derived from dental composite resins on the regulation of Streptococcus mutans gene expression. Biomaterials, 2009. 30(4): p. 452- 459
  14. Breschi L., Mazzoni A., Ruggeri A., Cadenaro M., Lenarda R. et al., Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. dental materials, 2008. 24(1): p. 90-101
  15. Imazato S., Kuramoto A., Takahashi Y., Ebisu S., Peters M.C., In vi