Journals / 7tepe Klinik / 2021 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

Classification of tooth wear and indexes used in diagnosis

Diş aşınmalarının sınıflandırılması ve teşhiste kullanılan indeksler

Pages
226–234
Publication Date
2022-09-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The purpose of this review is to classify the tooth wear according to their etiology, to analyze the evolution of the evaluation indices used to date, and to evaluate whether they meet clinical needs in dentistry.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Despite the different etiologies of attrition, abrasion, erosion and abfraction lesions, which are defined as caries-free tooth surface losses, they are mainly manifested by changes in tooth structures and are considered to be ‘‘tooth wear’’.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Tooth wear is a serious problem for clinicians.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The purpose of this review is to classify the tooth wear according to their etiology, to analyze the evolution of the evaluation indices used to date, and to evaluate whether they meet clinical needs in dentistry.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Despite the different etiologies of attrition, abrasion, erosion and abfraction lesions, which are defined as caries-free tooth surface losses, they are mainly manifested by changes in tooth structures and are considered to be ‘‘tooth wear’’. Tooth wear is a serious problem for clinicians. However, clinical and epidemiological studies in the literature are very difficult to interpret, especially due to differences in terminology and the presence of a large number of indices that can be used in the diagnosis, classification and follow-up of tooth hard tissue loss. The purpose of this review is to classify the tooth wear according to their etiology, to analyze the evolution of the evaluation indices used to date, and to evaluate whether they meet clinical needs in dentistry.

Özet

Çürüksüz diş yüzey kayıpları olarak tanımlanan atrizyon, abrazyon, erozyon ve abfraksiyon lezyonları etiyolojileri farklı olsa da temelde diş yapılarında değişiklikle kendilerini gösterir ve ‘‘diş aşınmaları’’ olarak nitelendirilir. Diş aşınmaları klinisyenler için ciddi bir problem oluşturmaktadır. Ancak özellikle terminolojideki farklılıklar ve diş sert doku kaybının teşhisinde, sınıflandırılmasında ve takibinde kullanılabilecek çok sayıda indeksin varlığı nedeniyle literatürdeki klinik ve epidemiyolojik çalışmaların yorumlanması oldukça zordur. Bu derlemenin amacı, diş aşınmalarını etiyolojilerine göre sınıflandırarak, günümüze kadar kullanılan değerlendirme indekslerinin evrimini analiz etmek ve bu indekslerin diş hekimliğindeki klinik ihtiyaçları karşılayıp karşılamadıklarını değerlendirmektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şahin, S. C., Koyal, Ç. (2022). Classification of tooth wear and indexes used in diagnosis. 7tepe Klinik, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 226–234. https://ajindex.com/articles/426056

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Haddadin K, Rassas E, Masarweh N, Haddadin KH. Causes for tooth surface loss in a group of Jordanian population. Pak Oral Dent J 2015;35:129-134
  2. Bartlett D, Ganss C, Lussi A. Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE): A new scoring system for scientific and clinical needs. Clin Oral Investig 2008;12:8-65
  3. Bassiouny MA. Effect of sweetening agents in acidic beverages on associated erosion lesions. Gen Dent 2012;60:30-322
  4. Rashid H, Hanif A, Nasim M. Tooth surface loss revisited: Classification, etiology, and management. J Restor Dent 2015;3:37-43
  5. Kaidonis JA. Tooth wear: The view of the anthropologist. Clin Oral Investig 2008; 12: 6-21
  6. Van’t Spijker A, Rodriguez JM, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, Bartlett DW, et al. Prevalence of tooth wear in adults. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22:35-42
  7. Davies SJ, Gray RJM, Qualtrough AJ. Management of tooth surface loss. Br Dent J 2002;192:11-23
  8. Bartlett DW, Fares J, Shirodaria S, Chiu K, Ahmad N, et al. The association of tooth wear, diet and dietary habits in adults aged 18-30 years old. J Dent 2011;39:811-816
  9. Lussi A. Erosive tooth wear–A multifactorial condition of growing concern and increasing knowledge. Monogr Oral Sci 2006;20:1-8
  10. Azouzi I, kalghoum I, Hadyaoui D, Harzallah B, Cherif M. Principles and guidelines for managing tooth wear: A review. Intern Med Care 2018;2:1-9
  11. Al-Zarea, Bader K. Tooth surface loss and associated risk factors in Northern Saudi Arabia. ISRN Dent 2012;1-5
  12. Smith BGN, Bartlett DW, Robb ND. The prevalence, etiology and management of tooth wear in the United Kingdom. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:367-372
  13. Wood I, Jawad Z, Paisley C, Brunton P. Non-carious cervical tooth surface loss: A literature review. J Dent 2008;36:759-766
  14. Lussi A, Carvalho TS. Erosive tooth wear: A multifactorial condition of growing concern and increasing knowledge. Monogr Oral Sci 2014;25:1-15
  15. Lussi A, Schlueter N, Rakhmatullina E, Ganss C. Dental erosion-An overview with emphasis on chemical and histopathological aspects. Caries Res 2011;45:2-12
  16. Grippo JO. Abfractions: A new classification of hard tissue lesions of teeth. J Esthet Dent 1991;3:14-19
  17. Hobkirk JA. Tooth surface loss: causes and effects. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:340-341
  18. Mair LH. Wear in dentistry-current terminology. J Dent 1992;20:140-144
  19. Chu FCS, Yip HK, Newsome PRH, Chow TW, Smales RJ. Restorative management of the worn dentition: I. Aetiology and diagnosis. Dent Update 2002;29:162-168. 20.