Journals / 7tepe Klinik / 2022 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

Retrospective investigation of root canal anatomy and morphology of permanent teeth on CBCT images

Sürekli dişlerin kök kanal anatomi ve morfolojilerinin KIBT görüntülerinde retrospektif olarak incelenmesi

Pages
23–30
Publication Date
2022-09-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When all these results are evaluated, it can be said that CBCT is a good option for analyzing the root canal anatomy and morphology.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Adequate root canal morphology knowledge is required for successful canal treatment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Method: Central, lateral, canine, premolar and molar tooth groups were evaluated by using CBCT cross-sectional images taken retrospectively from 100 female and 100 male patients over the age of 18 for various reasons (embedded 20 age females, implant planning, etc.).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When all these results are evaluated, it can be said that CBCT is a good option for analyzing the root canal anatomy and morphology.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Adequate root canal morphology knowledge is required for successful canal treatment. Many methods can be used for the detection of root canal morphology. Today, Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) is a good option for the examination of root canal anatomy and morphology. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the number of roots in each tooth, root canal number, canal configuration, correlation of canal anatomy in the right and left jaws, and the relationship between canal variations and gender. Materials and Method: Central, lateral, canine, premolar and molar tooth groups were evaluated by using CBCT cross-sectional images taken retrospectively from 100 female and 100 male patients over the age of 18 for various reasons (embedded 20 age females, implant planning, etc.). Results: While Type 1 and Type 4 canal configurations were found the most common in the maxillary teeth; Type 1, Type 2 and Type 4 canal configurations were detected more common in the mandible. No significant difference was found when the right and left jaws were compared in terms of root number, canal number and canal configuration. Likewise, there is no significant difference between male and female genders in terms of root number, number of canals and canal configuration. Conclusion: The results obtained in our study are similar to the studies conducted on different populations and using different methods. When all these results are evaluated, it can be said that CBCT is a good option for analyzing the root canal anatomy and morphology.

Özet

Amaç: Başarılı bir kanal tedavisi için öncelikle yeterli kök kanal morfolojisi bilgisine sahip olmak gerekmektedir. Kök kanal morfolojisi tespiti için pek çok yöntem kullanılabilmektedir. Günümüzde Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi (KIBT), kök kanal anatomi ve morfolojisinin incelenmesinde iyi bir seçenek olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı; üst ve alt çene sürekli dişlerde kök sayısı, her dişte bulunan kanal sayısı, kanal konfigürasyonu, kanal anatomilerinin sağ ve sol çenelerdeki korelasyonu ve kanal varyasyonlarının cinsiyet ile olan ilişkisinin incelenmesidir. Materyal ve Metod: Retrospektif olarak 18 yaş üstü 100 kadın 100 erkek hastadan daha önceden çeşitli nedenlerle (gömülü 20 yaş dişi, implant planlaması v.b.) alınmış olan KIBT kesit görüntüleri kullanılarak santral, lateral, kanin, premolar ve molar diş grupları incelenmiştir. Bulgular: Üst çene dişlerde genel olarak en sık Tip 1 ve Tip 4 kanal konfigürasyonuna rastlanırken, alt çenede ise Tip 1, Tip 2 ve Tip 4 kanal konfigürasyonu tespit edilmiştir. Sağ ve sol çeneler kök sayısı, kanal sayısı ve kanal konfigürasyonu açısından karşılaştırıldığında anlamlı fark bulunamamıştır. Aynı şekilde kadın ve erkek cinsiyetleri kök sayısı, kanal sayısı ve kanal konfigürasyonu açısından karşılaştırıldığında anlamlı fark bulunamamıştır. Sonuç: Çalışmamızda elde edilen sonuçlar farklı toplumlar üzerinde ve farklı yöntemler kullanılarak yapılan çalışmalarla benzerlik göstermektedir. Tüm bu sonuçlar değerlendirildiğinde KIBT’ın kök kanal anatomi ve morfolojisini incelemede karşımıza iyi bir seçenek olarak çıktığı söylenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

EREN, İ., SONAT, B. (2022). Retrospective investigation of root canal anatomy and morphology of permanent teeth on CBCT images. 7tepe Klinik, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 23–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/426017

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Rubinstein RA, Kim S. Long-term follow-up of cases considered healed one year after apical microsurgery. Journal of Endodontics 2002; 28: 378-383
  2. Kim E, Kim D, Roh BD, Cho YS, Lee SJ. Computed tomography as a diagnostic aid for extracanal invasive resorption. Journal of Endodontics 2003; 29: 463-465
  3. Peters OA, Laib A, Ruegsegger P, Barbakow F. Three-dimensional analysis of root canal geometry by high-resolution computed tomography. Journal of Dental Research 2000; 79: 1405-1409
  4. Peters OA, Laib A, Gohring TN, Barbakow F. Changes in root canal geometry after preparation assessed by high-resolution computed tomography. Journal of Endodontics 2001; 27: 1-6
  5. Peters OA, Peters CI, Schonenberger K, Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: assessment of torque and force in relation to canal anatomy. International Endodontic Journal 2003; 36: 93-99
  6. Gutmann JL, Fan B. Part I: The Core Science Of Endodontics Tooth Morphology, Isolation, and Access. In: Cohen’s Pathways Of The Pulp, Eleventh Edition, Ed.: Hargreaves K.M., Berman L.H., Elsevier, Missouri. 2016; 130-208
  7. Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 1984; 58: 589-599
  8. Sert S, Bayırlı GS. Evaluation of the root canal configurations of the mandibular and maxillary permanent teeth by gender in the Turkish population. Journal of Endodontics, 2004; 30: 391-398
  9. Skidmore AE, Bjorndal AM. Root canal morphology of the human mandibular first molar. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, 1971; 32: 778- 784 10. Pineda F, Kuttler Y. Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7,275 root canals. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 1972; 33: 101-110
  10. Seidberg BH, Altman M, Guttuso J, Suson M. Frequency of two mesiobuccal root canals in maxillary permanent first molars. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 1973; 87: 852-856
  11. Sperber GH, Moreau JL. Study of the number of roots and canals in Senegalese first permanent mandibular molars. International Endodontic Journal, 1998; 31: 117-122
  12. Gulabivala K, Opasanon A, Ng YL, Alavi A. Root and canal morphology of Thai mandibular molars. International Endodontic Journal, 2002; 35: 56-62
  13. Demirbuğa S, Şekerci AE, Dinçer AN, Çayabatmaz M,Zorba YO. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate root and canal morphology of mandibular first and second molars in Turkish individuals. Medicina Oral, P