Journals / Acta Infologica / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Determining the Cryptography Algorithm and Model for Mobile Payment Systems

Mobil Ödeme Sistemleri için Şifreleme Algoritmasının ve Modelinin Belirlenmesi

Pages
21–33
Publication Date
2022-09-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of this study, AdvancedEncryption Standard was found to be approximately three times fast than among all algorithms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Mobile payment systems are becoming one of the most popular technologies nowadays.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A mobile paymentsystem is an application that provides a payment channel easily and quickly without credit card information.All payments can be either over GSM bill or from your phone application account.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of this study, AdvancedEncryption Standard was found to be approximately three times fast than among all algorithms.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Mobile payment systems are becoming one of the most popular technologies nowadays. A mobile paymentsystem is an application that provides a payment channel easily and quickly without credit card information.All payments can be either over GSM bill or from your phone application account. Each mobile applicationhas different requirements. The main requirements of mobile payment systems are functionality, securityand speed. The cryptography model and algorithm are very important to make all transactions securely onmobile payment applications. The speed factor is also very important during payment on mobile paymentapplications. If security does not provide a minimum time consumption on application, this system becomesnot preferable. Therefore, we analyzed the time consumption of the cryptographic algorithms to specify thebest model and algorithm for mobile payment applications. In this study, we tried to find most suitablecryptographic model and algorithm for mobile payment systems. We compared Rivest-Shamir-Adleman,which is a well-known asymmetric key algorithm, with well-known symmetric algorithms such as DataEncryption Standard, Triple Data Encryption Standard, and Advanced Encryption Standard in terms of timeconsumption of the algorithm over encryption and decryption processes. As a result of this study, AdvancedEncryption Standard was found to be approximately three times fast than among all algorithms.

Özet

Mobil ödeme sistemi son zamanlarda en yeni ve en popüler teknoloji olmaktadır. Mobil ödeme sistemi kredi kartı bilgileri olmaksızın hızlı ve güvenli ödeme kanalı sağlayan bir uygulamadır. Tüm ödemeler ya tanımlı olan operatör hattının faturasından ya da telefondaki uygulama hesabından yapılabilmektedir. Her uygulamanın farklı gereksinimleri vardır. Mobil ödeme sistemlerinin ana gereksinimleri fonksiyonellik, güvenlik ve hızdır. Mobile ödeme sistemlerinde ödeme esnasında en önemlisi hız etkenidir. Eğer güvenlik uygulamada en az zaman tüketimini sağlamıyorsa bu sistem tercih edilmemektedir. Bu yüzden mobil ödeme uygulamalarına en uygun modeli ve algoritmayı belirlemek için bu çalışmada şifreleme algoritmalarının zaman tüketimini kontrol ettik. Bu çalışmada mobil ödeme sistemleri için en uygun şifreleme modeli ve algoritmayı bulmaya çalışmaktayız. En çok bilinen asimetrik anahtarlı şifreleme olan Rivest-Sahmir- Adleman ile en çok bilinen simetrik algoritmaları olan Veri Şifreleme Standardı, Üçlü Veri Şifreleme Standardı, Geliştirilmiş Şifreleme Standardını şifreleme ve deşifreleme işlemleri esnasında tükettikleri zamanlara göre karşılaştırdık. Çalışmanın sonucu olarak Geliştirilmiş Şifreleme Standardı diğer algoritmalardan yaklaşık olarak üç kat daha hızlı olduğu gözlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENGEL, Ö., AYDIN, M. A., SERTBAŞ, A. (2022). Determining the Cryptography Algorithm and Model for Mobile Payment Systems. Acta Infologica, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 21–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/425996

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Barker, E., & Mouha, N. (2017). Recommendation for the Triple Data Encryption Algorithm (TDEA) block cipher. Retrieved from https://nvlpubs.nist. gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-67r2.pdf Beunardeau, M., Connolly, A., Geraud, R., & Naccache, D. (2016). White-box cryptography: Security in an insecure environment. IEEE Security & Privacy, 14(5), 88–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/msp.2016.100
  2. Billet, O., Gilbert, H., & Ech-Chatbi, C. (2004). Cryptanalysis of a White box AES implementation. Selected Areas in Cryptography Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3357, 227–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30564-4_16
  3. Chow, S., Eisen, P., Johnson, H., & Oorschot, P. C. (2003a). A White-box DES implementation for DRM applications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Digital Rights Management, 2696, 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44993-5_1
  4. Chow, S., Eisen, P., Johnson, H., & Oorschot, P. C. (2003b). White-box cryptography and an AES implementation. Selected Areas in Cryptography Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2595, 250–270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36492-7_17 Delerablée, C., Lepoint, T., Paillier, P., & Rivain, M. (2014). White-Box Security Notions for Symmetric Encryption Schemes. Selected Areas in Cryptography - SAC 2013 Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8282, 247–264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43414-7_13 Federal Information Processing Standards Publication: Advanced encryption standard (AES). (2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/nist.fips.197 Federal Information Processing Standards Publication: Data encryption standard (DES). (1993). http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/nist.fips.46-2
  5. Jonsson, J., & Kaliski, B. (2003). Public-Key Cryptography Standards (PKCS)#1: RSA cryptography specifications version 2.1 (pp. 1–68). http://dx.doi. org/10.17487/rfc3447 Lepoint, T., Rivain, M., Mulder, Y. D., Roelse, P., & Preneel, B. (2014). Two attacks on a white-box AES implementation. Selected Areas in Cryptography Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8282, 265–285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43414-7_14
  6. Mahajan, P., & Sachdeva, A. (2013).
  7. A study of encryption algorithms AES, DES and RSA for security. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 13(15). Mathur, M., & Kesarwani, A. (2013). Comparison between Des, 3des, Rc2, Rc6, Blowfish and Aes. In Proceedings of National Conference on New Horizons in IT-NCNHIT (Vol. 3, pp. 143–148).
  8. Michiels, W., Gorissen, P., & Hollmann, H. D. (2009). Cryptanalysis of a generic class of white-box i