Journals / Acta Infologica / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Information Technology Governance Practices,Challenges and Effects on Enterprise Performance

Bilgi Teknolojileri Yönetişim Uygulamaları, Güçlükler ve Kurumsal Performansa Etkileri

Pages
65–78
Publication Date
2022-09-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our study can be viewed as an initial attempt to the enhancementof ITGP and enterprise performance knowledge domains.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Information Technology Governance (ITG) is important for enterprises in many respects.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Another issue in this context is how an enterprise can manage its own ITresources according to its business strategy and functions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our study can be viewed as an initial attempt to the enhancementof ITGP and enterprise performance knowledge domains.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Information Technology Governance (ITG) is important for enterprises in many respects. Acquiring betteroutputs from Information Technologies (IT) investments and meeting various expectations in business canbe shown as primary examples. Another issue in this context is how an enterprise can manage its own ITresources according to its business strategy and functions. IT Governance Practices (ITGP), which is alsodescribed as best practices, are one of the main approaches that can be used to handle these issues. On thebusiness side, Critical Success Factors (CSF) and Key Performance Indicators (KPI) are amongst the othertools used by enterprises for performance management. However, it is seen that there are not enough researchstudies exploring ITGP implementation challenges, their effects on CSF, KPI, and their relationships. In thispaper, we present the findings of a qualitative research conducted according to the guidelines of SystematicLiterature Review and Systematic Mapping Methods. The research outputs are promising though there arelimitations that should be considered as well. Our study can be viewed as an initial attempt to the enhancementof ITGP and enterprise performance knowledge domains.

Özet

Bilgi Teknolojileri Yönetimi (BTY) birçok açıdan organizasyonlar için önemlidir. Bilişim Teknolojileri (BT)yatırımlarından daha iyi sonuç alınması ve işletmelerdeki çeşitli beklentilerin BT tarafından karşılaşmasıbunlara örnek gösterilebilir. Bu kapsamdaki bir diğer konu ise işletmelerin BT uygulamalarına göre kendibilişim teknolojilerini nasıl yönetebildikleridir. En iyi uygulamalar (best practices) olarak nitelendirilenBilgi Teknolojileri Yönetim Uygulamaları (BTYU), bu konulara çözüm getirmek üzere kullanılanyaklaşımların başında gelmektedir. Öte yandan, Kritik Başarı Faktörleri (KBF) ve Anahtar PerformansGöstergeleri (APG) ise işletmeler tarafından kurumsal performans yönetiminde kullanılan araçlararasındadır. Ancak, alan yazın taraması sonucunda BTYU’nın uygulama güçlüklerini, KBF ve APG’ne olanetkilerini ve bunlar arasındaki ilişkileri inceleyen yeterli sayıda çalışmaların bulunmadığı gözlenmiştir. Sözkonusu araştırma problemine yönelik olarak bu çalışmada Sistematik Haritalama ile Sistematik LiteratürTaraması yöntemlerinin bütünleştirilmesiyle gerçekleştirilen araştırmaya ait bulgular sunulmuş, sonuçlarBTYU ve kuramsal temeller çerçevesinde tartışılmıştır. Araştırmamız BTYU’nın iyileştirilmesine yönelikbir girişim olarak nitelendirilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

UYSAL, M. P., ÇETİNKAYA, E. (2022). Information Technology Governance Practices,Challenges and Effects on Enterprise Performance. Acta Infologica, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 65–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/425990

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. AIS, (2020, November 1). The Association for Information Systems. Retrieved from https://aisnet.org
  2. Al-Alawi, A.I., Al-Marzooqi, N.Y, Mohammed, Y.F. (2007) Organizational culture and knowledge sharing: Critical success factors. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(2), 22-42.
  3. Arnold Christian, Voigt Kai-Ingo (2017). Ecosystem effects of the industrial internet of things on manufacturing companies. Acta Infologica, 1(2), 99-108.
  4. Ash, C.G. & Burn, J.M (2003). Assessing the benefits from e-business transformation through effective enterprise management. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(4), 297-308.
  5. Barafort, B., Mesquida, A.-L. & Mas, A. (2017). Integrating risk management in IT settings from ISO standards and management systems perspectives. Computer Standards and Interfaces, 54(1), 176-185.
  6. Blokdyk G. (2020). Enterprise performance management a complete guide - 2020 edition. 5STARCooks, USA. Chen, Y.-C & Wu, J.-H (2011). IT management capability and its impact on the performance of a CIO. Information and Management, 48(5), 145-156.
  7. Çetinkaya, E. (2017). The effects of IT governance practices on key performance indicators in organizations. Unpublished MS Thesis, Ufuk University, Turkey. CMMI (2021, February 6). Capability Maturity Model Integration. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, USA. Retrieved from https://www.sei.cmu.edu/ de Haes, S., van Grembergen (2009). An exploratory study into IT governance implementations and its impact on business /IT alignment. Information Systems Management, 26(2), 123-137.
  8. De Sousa, J. M. E. (2004). Definition and analysis of critical success factors for ERP implementation projects. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain. Dede B. (2016). Building risk matrix by COSO and COBIT models in banking sector: An application for consumer loan process. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Marmara University, Turkey. Dimon R. (2013). Enterprise performance management done right: an operating system for your organization. Wiley, USA. Franceschini F., Galetto M. & Maisano, D. (2007). Management by measurement: Designing key indicators and performance measurement systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, USA. ISACA (2021). Information Systems Audit and Control Association; COBIT 5: Control Objectives for Information and Related Technology Framework, ISACA, USA. ITGI (2020).
  9. IT Governance Institute, IL, USA. ITIL (2021, February 6). Information Technology Infrastructure Library. Retri