Journals / Acta Medica Alanya / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Thoracic outlet syndrome: efficiency of surgery

Torasik Outlet Sendromunda Cerrahi Tedavinin Etkinliği

Pages
270–277
Publication Date
2022-09-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that EMG of upper extremity supported TOS with a rate of 48.6% and arterial doppler of upper extremity supported TOS with a rate of 13,5%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical treatment in patients diagnosed with thoracic outlet syndrome.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and Methods: This study was conducted by analyzing the age, sex, occupational distribution, anamnesis and physical examination findings, symptoms, preoperative examinations, operation findings, postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay and operation results of thirty seven patients who were diagnosed with Thoracic Outlet Syndrome, and were operated on between 1991 and 2004.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that EMG of upper extremity supported TOS with a rate of 48.6% and arterial doppler of upper extremity supported TOS with a rate of 13,5%.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical treatment in patients diagnosed with thoracic outlet syndrome. Patients and Methods: This study was conducted by analyzing the age, sex, occupational distribution, anamnesis and physical examination findings, symptoms, preoperative examinations, operation findings, postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay and operation results of thirty seven patients who were diagnosed with Thoracic Outlet Syndrome, and were operated on between 1991 and 2004. Results: Most of the patients were in the 15-35 age group (72.97%) and female (91.9%). Most of these cases were housewives (51.4%). The most common symptoms were pain (94.6%) and numbness (78.4%). The most commonly used test in physical examination was the Adson test, which provided an 86% positive rate. The most common pathology encountered in radiological tests was cervical rib anomaly (37.8%). It was found that EMG of upper extremity supported TOS with a rate of 48.6% and arterial doppler of upper extremity supported TOS with a rate of 13,5%. We applied first rib and cervical rib resection scalenectomy and cutting of fibromuscular bands as a surgery by transaxillary approach. A 78.4% complete recovery was observed in the early period after surgery and there was no mortality in any of the cases. Conclusion: In this study, the results were satisfactory in TOS patients on suitable cases and with good surgical technique. Surgical success rate can reach up to 97%.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, Torasik outlet sendromu tanısı konulan hastalarda cerrahi tedavinin etkinliğini değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Hastalar ve Yöntem: 1991 ile 2004 yılları arasında Torasik Outlet Sendromu tanısı almış ve tedavi yöntemi olarak cerrahi uygulanmış otuz yedi olgunun yaş, cins, meslek dağılımı, anamnez ve fizik muayene bulguları, semptomları, preoperatif tetkikleri, operasyon bulguları, postoperatif komplikasyonları, postoperatif hastanede kalış süreleri ve operasyon sonuçlan incelenerek yapıldı. Bulgular: Olguların çoğu 15-35 yaş grubunda (% 72.97) ve kadınlardan (% 91,9) oluşmaktaydı. Bu olguların çoğu ev hanımıydı (% 51.4). En sık rastlanılan semptomlar ağrı (%94,6) ve uyuşma (% 78.4) idi. Fizik muayenede en sık kullanılan test Adson testi idi. Adson testi %86 oranında pozitif bulundu. Radyolojik testlerde en sık karşılaşılan patoloji servikal kosta anomalisiydi (% 37.8). üst ekstremite EMG sinin %48.6, üst ekstremite arteriel doplerinde% 13.5 oranında TOS u desteklediği bulundu. Cerrahide transaksiller girişim ile birinci kosta ve servikal kosta rezeksiyonu. skalenektomi fibromüsküler bantların kesilmesi işlemlerini uyguladık. Cerrahiden sonra erken dönemde %78.4 oranında tam düzelme görüldü. Olguların hiçbirinde mortalite olmadı. Sonuç: Bu çalışmada TOS hastalarda, uygun olgularda ve iyi cerrahi teknik ile sonuçlar tatmin edici bulundu. Cerrahi başarı oranı %97 lere kadar çıkabilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aslaner, O. (2022). Thoracic outlet syndrome: efficiency of surgery. Acta Medica Alanya, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 270–277. https://ajindex.com/articles/425931

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Pajaj E, Alimehmedi R, Dashi F. Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Reviewed. Albanian Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (2020) 4/2: 705 - 710 DOI: 10.32391/ajtes.v4i2.119 2. Illıg KA, Zoppi ER, Bland T. The Incidence of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome. Annals of Vascular Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2020.07.029 3. Krusen EM. Cervical pain syndromes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1968
  2. 82 PMID: 4385559 4. Keshishian JM, Smyth NPD. Thoracic Outlet Syndrome. Diagnosis and management. Ann Thoracic Surgery 1970
  3. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)65529- 4 5. Hwang JI, Ku S, Jeong JH. Traditional medicine treatment for thoracic outlet syndrome. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 2
  4. 99(27): e21074. doi: 10.1097/ MD.0000000000021074 6. Gelabert HA, Rigberg DA, O'Connell JB, Jabori S, Jimenez JC, Farley. Transaxillary decompression of thoracic outlet syndrome patients presenting with cervical ribs. J Vasc Surg. 2018 Oct
  5. 68(4):1143-1149. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.01.057. Epub 2018 Apr 25.PMID: 29705086 7. Roos DB. Experience with first rib reseetion for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome. Ann Thoracic Surg 1971
  6. 42 doi: 10.1097/00000658-197103000-00015. 8. Rob CG. Standover A. Arteriel occlsion complating Thoracic Outlet Syndrome. Br MedJ 1958
  7. 709 doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5098.709. 9. Nelson RM, Davis RW. Thoracic Outlet Compression Syndrome. Ann Thoracic Surg. 1969
  8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)66074-2. 10. Roos DB. New concepts of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome that exp|ain etiology, symptoms, diagnosis and treatment. S Vasculer Surgery 1989
  9. doi: 10.1177/153857447901300503 11. Machleder HI, Moll F, Verty A. The anterior scalene muscle in thoracic outlet syndrome: histochemical and morphometric studies. Arc surg 1986
  10. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400100047009 12. Mingoli A. Feldhouse RJ. Farina C. Cavallari N Sapienza P. Cavallaro A. Longterm outeomes after trasaksillary approach for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Surgery 1995
  11. 118(5):840-4 doi: 10.1016/S0039-6060(05)80274-0 13. Panda N, Phillips W, Geller A, Lipsitz SR. Supraclavicular Approach for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome (nTOS): Description of a Learning Curve and Patient Functional Outcomes. Thoracic Surgery. 231
  12. 294, DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.07.434 14. Jamieson WG,Chinnick B. Thoracic outlet syndrome:fact or fancy? A revievv of 409 consecutive patients who underwent operation. Can J Surg 1996
  13. 39(4):321-6. PMID: 8697324 15. Stilo F.Montelione N, Benedetto F et all. Thirty-