Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 6

Cadmium stabilization via sequential application of phytoremediation and pyrolysis

Fitoremediasyon ve piroliz işlemlerinin ardışık uygulamasıyla kadmiyum stabilizasyonu

Pages
497–502
Publication Date
2016-12-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The phytoremediation results indicated that high phytoremediation efficiencies (89.6-93.5%) were observed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of this study is the treatment of cadmium (Cd) contaminated soil and stabilization of cadmium (Cd) in a solid product.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Phytoremediation was realized with different chelate (EDTA) concentrations (0-5-10 mmol/kg).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The phytoremediation results indicated that high phytoremediation efficiencies (89.6-93.5%) were observed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fitoremediasyon · Kadmiyum · Piroliz

Abstract

The objective of this study is the treatment of cadmium (Cd) contaminated soil and stabilization of cadmium (Cd) in a solid product. For this aim, phytoremediation and pyrolysis were sequentially applied. Phytoremediation was first applied to cadmium contaminated soil via different plants (sunflower, corn and rape). After harvesting, contaminated plants were pyrolyzed. Phytoremediation was realized with different chelate (EDTA) concentrations (0-5-10 mmol/kg). The phytoremediation results indicated that high phytoremediation efficiencies (89.6-93.5%) were observed. Then, contaminated plants were pyrolyzed at 500°C with the heating rate of 35 °C/min in a fixed bed 240 m3 stainless steel reactor (380 S). Beside the main property analyses, Cd content and eluate analysis were performed on the pyrolysis solid and liquid products. According to pyrolysis results, Cd content of the contaminated biomass species is fixed into the ash/char fraction.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, toprakta kirletici olarak bulunan kadmiyumun (Cd) stabilizasyonunu sağlamak için, ardışık olarak fitoremediasyon ve piroliz işlemlerinin uygulanmasıdır. Çalışmanın ilk aşamasında, kadmiyumla kirlenmiş topraklara farklı bitkilerle (ayçiçeği, mısır ve kanola) ve farklı EDTA derişimleriyle (0-5-10 mmol/kg) fitoremediasyon uygulanmıştır. Fitoremediasyon çalışmaları sonucunda, %89.6-93.5 aralığında giderim verimleri elde edilmiştir. Hasat işleminden sonra kadmiyumla kirlenmiş bitkiler, 240 cm3’lük paslanmaz çelik (380 S) sabit yatak bir reaktörde 500 °C sıcaklık ve 35 °C/dk ısıtma hızında piroliz edilmiştir. Pirolizden sonra, katı ve sıvı ürünlerin metal içeriği ve özellikleri belirlenmiş ve ayrıca katı üründe eluat analizleri yapılmıştır. Piroliz sonucunda kirlenmiş bitkilerdeki kadmiyumun katı üründe stabilize edildiği belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özkan, A., Banar, M., Günkaya, Z., Kulaç, A., Yalçın, G., Taşpınar, K., Altay, A. (2016). Cadmium stabilization via sequential application of phytoremediation and pyrolysis. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 6, 497–502. https://ajindex.com/articles/42588

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Liu W, Zhou Q, Zhang Z, Hua T, Cai Z. “Evaluation of cadmium phytoremediation potential in chinese cabbage cultivars”. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 59(15), 8324-8330, 2001.
  2. Banar M, Özkan A, Kulaç A. “Application of ANP and electre for the assessment of different site remediation technologies”. Proceedings of the World Congress on New Technologies (NewTech 2015),
  3. Barcelona, Spain, 15-17 July 2015.
  4. Chang Y, Chang Y, Lin C, Lee M, Wu C, Lai Y. “Nitrogen fertilization promotes the phytoremediation of cadmium in Pentas lanceolata”. International Biodeteriotion & Biodegredation, 85, 709-714, 2013. EPA. US Environmental Protection Agency. “Technologies for Cleaning Up Contaminated Sites”. http://www2.epa.gov/remedytech, 2015.
  5. Goswami S, Das S. “A study on cadmium phytoremediation potential of indian mustard, Brassica juncea”. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 17(1-6), 583-588, 2015.
  6. Huang H, Yua N, Wang L, Gupta DK, He Z, Wang K, Zhu Z, Yan X, Li T, Yang X. “The phytoremediation potential of bioenergy crop Ricinus communis for DDTs and cadmium co-contaminated soil”. Bioresource Technology, 102(23), 11034-11038, 2011.
  7. Sangthong C, Setkit K, Prapagdee B. “Improvement of cadmium phytoremediation after soil inoculation with a cadmium-resistant Micrococcus sp.”. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(1), 756-764, 2015.
  8. Stingua A, Volfa I, Popaa VI, Gostin I. “New approaches concerning the utilization of natural amendments in cadmium phytoremediation”. Industrial Crops and Products, 35(1), 53-60, 2012.
  9. Marques APGC, Moreira H, Franco AR, Rangel AOSS, Castro PML. “Inoculating Helianthus annus (sunflower) grown in zinc and cadmium contaminated soils with plant growth promoting bacteria-Effects on phytoremediation strategies”. Chemosphere, 92(1), 74-83, 2013.
  10. Sun Y, Xu Y, Zhou Q, Wang L, Lin D, Liang X. “The potential of gibberellic acid 3 (GA3) and Tween-80 induced phytoremediation of co-contamination of Cd and Benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) using Tagetes patula”. Journal of Environmental Management, 114, 202-208, 2013.
  11. Stals M, Thijssen E, Vangronsveld J, Carleer R, Schreurs S, Yperman J. “Flash pyrolysis of heavy metal contaminated biomass from phytoremediation: Influence of temperature, entrained flow and wood/leaves blended pyrolysis on the behaviour of heavy metals”. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 87(1), 1-7, 2010. Bay B. Farklı Biyokütle Türlerinin Termal Davranışlarının İncelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Teknik Ünive