Journals / Acta Medica Alanya / 2019 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of the novel electrocardiographic parameters in patients with acute cholecystitis

Akut kolesistitli hastalarda yeni elektrokardiyografik parametrelerin değerlendirilmesi

Pages
236–240
Publication Date
2022-09-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

No statistically significant difference was found between two groupsin terms of p wave dispersion and Tp-e/QT ratio. ( 38.0±3.9 vs 37.9±4.4, p:0.93;0.21±0.07 vs 0.20±0.09, p:0.26 respectively)Conclusion: Patients with acute cholecystitis have similiar electrophysiological properties of myocardium and atrium on electrocardiography as compared with healthycontrols.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Acute cholecystitis (AC) can display electrocardiographic changes mim-ickingcardiovascular disorders.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to evaluate electrocardiographic changes with novel parameters in patients with AC.Methods: This study included 34 patients with AC and 30 controls.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:No statistically significant difference was found between two groupsin terms of p wave dispersion and Tp-e/QT ratio. ( 38.0±3.9 vs 37.9±4.4, p:0.93;0.21±0.07 vs 0.20±0.09, p:0.26 respectively)Conclusion: Patients with acute cholecystitis have similiar electrophysiological properties of myocardium and atrium on electrocardiography as compared with healthycontrols.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Acute cholecystitis (AC) can display electrocardiographic changes mim-ickingcardiovascular disorders. The aim of this study is to evaluate electrocardiographic changes with novel parameters in patients with AC.Methods: This study included 34 patients with AC and 30 controls. Control groupwas consisted of age and gender matched individuals without any cardiovascularand systemic disease. Demographic and clinical data were recorded. The electrocardiographic measurements were done in order to calculate QT interval , correctedQT (QTc) interval, peak and the end of the T wave (Tp-e), Tp-e/QT ratio and p wavedurations.Results: In our study there was no significant difference b etween two g roups interms of demographic data and clinical features. QT interval , corrected QT (QTc)interval, peak and the end of the T wave (Tp-e), and p wave durations were similiar inthe two groups. No statistically significant difference was found between two groupsin terms of p wave dispersion and Tp-e/QT ratio. ( 38.0±3.9 vs 37.9±4.4, p:0.93;0.21±0.07 vs 0.20±0.09, p:0.26 respectively)Conclusion: Patients with acute cholecystitis have similiar electrophysiological properties of myocardium and atrium on electrocardiography as compared with healthycontrols.

Özet

Amaç: Akut kolesistit (AC), kardiyovasküler hastalıkları taklit eden elektrokardiyografik değişiklikler gösterebilir. Bu çalışmanın amacı AC'li hastalarda elektrokardiyografik değişiklikleri yeni parametrelerle değerlendirmektir. Yöntemler: Çalışmaya AC 'li 34 hasta ve 30 kontrol dahil edildi. Kontrol grubu, herhangi bir kardiyovasküler ve sistemik hastalığı olmayan yaş ve cinsiyet uyumlu bireylerden oluşuyordu. Demografik ve klinik veriler kaydedildi. Elektrokardiyografik ölçümler QT aralığını, düzeltilmiş QT (QTc) aralığını, T dalgasının tepe noktası ve sonu (Tp-e), Tp-e / QT oranını ve p dalga sürelerini hesaplamak için yapıldı. Bulgular: Çalışmamızda demografik veriler ve klinik özellikler açısından iki grup arasında anlamlı fark yoktu. QT aralığı, düzeltilmiş QT (QTc) aralığı, T dalgasının tepe noktası ve sonu (Tp-e) ve p dalgası süreleri iki grupta benzerdi. İki grup arasında p dalga dispersiyonu ve Tp-e / QT oranı açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmadı. ( 38.0 ± 3.9 vs 37.9 ± 4.4, p: 0.930 ; 0.21 ± 0.07 vs 0.20 ± 0.09 , p: 0.260 sırasıyla ) Sonuç: Akut kolesistitli hastalar, sağlıklı kontroller ile karşılaştırıldığında elektrokardiyografide miyokard ve atriyumun benzer elektrofizyolojik özelliklerine sahiptir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖNCEL, C. R., ÇALIŞ, H. (2022). Evaluation of the novel electrocardiographic parameters in patients with acute cholecystitis. Acta Medica Alanya, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 236–240. https://ajindex.com/articles/425851

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Indar AA, Beckingham IJ. Acute cholecystitis. Br Med J 2002
  2. 325(7365):639-43. PMID:12242178 2. Ozeki M, Takeda Y, Morita H, Miyamura M, Sohmiya K, Hoshiga M, et al. Acute cholecystitis mimicking or accompanying cardiovascular disease among Japanese patients hospitalized in a Cardiology Department. BMC Res Notes. 2015
  3. PMID: 26686987 3. Aksay E, Ersel M, Kiyan S, Musalar E, Gungor H. Acute coronary syndrome mimicked by acute cholecystitis. Emerg Med Australas. 2010
  4. 22(4):343-46. PMID: 20796011 4. Seewoodhary J, Griffin L. Trifascicular block and a raised Troponin 'T' in acute cholecystitis. QJM. 2010
  5. 103(2):121-23. PMID: 19846576 5. Soric M, Miletic W, Ziga S, Grabovac V. Intermittent Complete Heart Block in Acute Calculous Cholecystitis. SIGNA VITAE 2015
  6. 10(SUPPL 1): 53-54. DOI:10.22514/ SV101.062015.14 6. Okutucu S, Aytemir K, Oto A. P-wave dispersion: What we know till now? JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2016
  7. 2048004016639443. PMID:27081484 7. Dural M, Mert KU, İskenderov K. Evaluation of Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT ratio, and Tp-e/QTc ratio in patients with mitral valve stenosis before and after balloon valvuloplasty. Anatol J Cardiol. 2017
  8. 18(5):353-60. PMID: 29044094 8. Yilmaz R, Demirbag R. P-wave dispersion in patients with stable coronary artery disease and its relationship with severity of the disease. J Electrocardiol 2005
  9. 38(3):279–84. PMID:16003716 9. Gupta P, Patel C, Patel H, Narayanaswamy S, Malhotra B, Green JT, et al. T(p-e)/ QT ratio as an index of arrhythmogenesis. J Electrocardiol. 2008
  10. 41(6):567-74. PMID:18790499 10. Yokoe M, Hata J, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, Wakabayashi G, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018
  11. 25(1):41-54. PMID: 29032636 11. Hodges MS, Salerno D, Erlinen D. Bazett's QT correction reviewed: evidence that a linear QT correction for heart rate is better. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983
  12. R.M. Lang, L.P. Badano, V. Mor-Avi, J. Afilalo, A. Armstrong, L. Ernande, et al.Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015
  13. 28(1):1-39. PMID:25559473 13. Ryan ET, Pak PH, DeSanctis RW. Myocardial infarction mimicked by acute cholecystitis. Ann Intern Med 1992
  14. 116(3):218–20. PMID:1728205 14. Franzen D, Jung S, Fatio R, Brunckhorst CB. Complete atrioventr