SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Acta Medica Alanya / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

The clinical outcomes of endovenous radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins: two year follow-up results

Kronik venöz yetmezlik olgularında Endovenöz Radyofrekans Ablasyonun Klinik Sonuçları: İki Yıllık Takip Sonuçları

Kadir Kaan Özsin
Fahri Hayri Atlı
Faruk Toktaş
Şenol Yavuz
Umut Serhat Sanrı
Pages
254–259
Publication Date
2022-09-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In the treatment of GSV insufficiency, RFA is a safely applied method with high occlusion rates and obvious VCSS score decrease.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Our aim was to evaluate the two-year results of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) insufficiency.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total number of 217 patients who underwent RFA (52.5 % male, mean age 42.7±11.4) were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In the treatment of GSV insufficiency, RFA is a safely applied method with high occlusion rates and obvious VCSS score decrease.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Our aim was to evaluate the two-year results of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) insufficiency. Methods: A total number of 217 patients who underwent RFA (52.5 % male, mean age 42.7±11.4) were included in the study. RFA was performed in patients with great saphenous vein valvular incompetence and saphenofemoral junction incompetence. Occlusion status was recorded by ultrasonography. Venous clinical severity score (VCSS) was calculated pre- and post-intervention. Results: The mean follow-up period of the patients was 22.2 ± 5.1 months. Cumulative survival rate (Kaplan–Meier) of 24-month follow-up was 84.3%. Complete occlusion rate for GSV was 100%, 98.6% ,97.6%, 97.6% and 97.6% for 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months follow up, respectively. VCSS was significantly different before RFA and 4 weeks after RFA (p < 0.001). No major complications were observed in the study. Conclusion: In the treatment of GSV insufficiency, RFA is a safely applied method with high occlusion rates and obvious VCSS score decrease.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda büyük safen ven (GSV) yetmezliğinin tedavisinde radyofrekans ablasyonun (RFA) iki yıllık sonuçlarını değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Yöntemler: Çalışmaya RFA uygulanan toplam 217 hasta (%52,5 erkek, ortalama yaş 42.7 ± 11.4) dahil edildi. RFA işlemi büyük safen vende kapak yetersizliği ve safenofemoral bileşkede venöz reflü olan hastalara uygulandı. Oklüzyon takibi doppler ultrasonografi ile yapıldı. Müdahale öncesi ve sonrası Venous clinical severity score (VCSS) kayıt altına alındı. Bulgular: Hastalar ortalama 22.2 ± 5,1 ay takip edildi. 24 aylık takipte kümülatif sağkalım oranı (Kaplan-Meier) %84,3 idi. GSV için tam oklüzyon oranı 1, 6, 12, 18 ve 24 aylık takiplerde sırasıyla % 100,% 98.6,% 97.6,% 97.6 ve% 97.6 idi. RFA işleminden önce ve RFA uygulandıktan 4 hafta sonra hesaplanan VCSS değerleri anlamlı ölçüde farklıydı (p <0.001). Çalışma sırasında önemli bir komplikasyon gözlenmedi. Sonuç: GSV yetmezliğinin tedavisinde RFA, yüksek oklüzyon oranları ve belirgin VCSS skoru düşüşü ile güvenli bir şekilde uygulanan bir yöntemdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özsin, K. K., Atlı, F. H., Toktaş, F., Yavuz, Ş., Sanrı, U. S. (2022). The clinical outcomes of endovenous radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins: two year follow-up results. Acta Medica Alanya, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 254–259. https://ajindex.com/articles/425835

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Leopardi D, Hoggan BL, Fitridge RA, Woodruff PW, Maddern GJ. Systematic Review of Treatments for Varicose Veins. Ann Vasc Surg. 2009
  2. 23(2):264–76. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.avsg.2008.10.007 2. Murad MH, Coto-Yglesias F, Zumaeta-Garcia M, Elamin MB, Duggirala MK, Erwin PJ, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the treatments of varicose veins. J Vasc Surg, 2011
  3. 53(2):51-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.02.031 3. Eroglu E, Yasim A. A randomised clinical trial comparing N-butyl cyanoacrylate, radiofrequency ablation and endovenous laser ablation for the treatment of superficial venous incompetence: two year follow up results. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2018
  4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.05.028 4. Klein JA. Tumescent technique chronicles: local anesthesia, liposuction, and beyond. Dermatol Surg. 1995
  5. 449–457. PMID: 8234507 5. Lohr J, Kulwicki A. Radiofrequency ablation: evolution of a treatment. Semin Vasc Surg. 2010
  6. 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2010.01.004 6. Kapoor A, Mahajan G. Endovenous ablation of saphenofemoral insufficiency: analysis of 100 patients using RF closure fast technique Indian J Surg, 2010: 72
  7. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s12262-010-0160-y 7. Perrins S, Cha A, Qaqish R, Plummer D, Hsu R, Dietzek A. M. Clinical and anatomic outcomes of endovenous radiofrequency ablation performed on symptomatic small-diameter great saphenous veins, Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders, 2013
  8. 3(1):45-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2012.10.064 8. Kheirelseid EAH, Crowe G, Sehgal R, Liakopoulos D, Bela H, Mulkern E, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating long-term outcomes of endovenous management of lower extremity varicose veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018
  9. 6(2):256-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.10.012 9. Bozoglan O, Mese B, Eroglu E, Erdogan MB, Erdem K, Ekerbicer HC, et al. Comparison of Endovenous Laser and Radiofrequency Ablation in Treating Varicose Veins in the Same Patient. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2016
  10. 50(1):47-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538574415625813 10. Shepherd AC, Gohel MS, Brown LC, Metcalfe MJ, Hamish M, Davies AH. Randomized clinical trial of VNUSVR ClosureFAST radiofrequency ablation versus laser for varicose veins. Br J Surg 2010
  11. 810–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2010.09.043 11. Joh JH, Park HC, Kim WS, Jung IM, Park KH, Yun WS, et al. The Clinical Outcomes of Endovenous