Journals / Acta Medica Alanya / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

Psychological conditions of patients whose infertility treatment was postponed due to the novel coronavirus pandemic lockdown

Yeni Koronavirüs Salgını Kapanma Süreci Nedeniyle İnfertilite Tedavisi Ertelenen Hastaların Psikolojik Durumları

Pages
289–293
Publication Date
2022-09-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Infertile patients will be more prone to depression and anxiety, and it should be noted that potential treatment postponements may increase their depression and anxiety.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: In this study, we planned to examine the psychological status of patients who were required to postpone their infertility treatment, by means of an online survey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: Mean scores of BDI and HAM-A in the whole group were 39.2(25-67) and 22.1(11-45), respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Infertile patients will be more prone to depression and anxiety, and it should be noted that potential treatment postponements may increase their depression and anxiety.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: In this study, we planned to examine the psychological status of patients who were required to postpone their infertility treatment, by means of an online survey. Methods: Sixty patients who were in the follow-up were informed and an access link of online survey, which included questions about age, infertility status, Beck’s depression inventory(BDI) and Hamilton’s anxiety rating scale (HAM-A), were sent to them. Three different grouping systems were used based on (i-) age, (ii-) fertility treatment status and (iii-) indications for assisted reproduction technology treatment. Results: Mean scores of BDI and HAM-A in the whole group were 39.2(25-67) and 22.1(11-45), respectively. In the evaluation of survey scores according to indications of fertility treatment, BDI scores were between 34.2-44.7 and there was no statistical significance between the groups (p:0.182). HAM-A scores were between 18.7-38.0 and there was no statistical significance between the groups (p:0.185). In addition, there was no statistical significance between groups for BDI and HAM-A (p: 0.962 and 0.423, respectively) according to patients’ ART treatment status at the time the 2019-nCoV outbreak began in our country. Conclusion: Infertile patients will be more prone to depression and anxiety, and it should be noted that potential treatment postponements may increase their depression and anxiety.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada infertilite tedavisi ertelenen hastaların psikolojik durumlarını online anket aracılığıyla incelemeyi planladık. Yöntemler: İnfertilite nedeniyle takipte olan 60 hasta anket ile ilgili bilgilendirildi. Yaş, infertilite durumu, Beck depresyon envanteri (BDI) ve Hamilton anksiyete derecelendirme ölçeği (HAM-A) ile ilgili soruları içeren çevrimiçi anketin erişim linki gönderildi. Hastalar (i-) yaş, (ii-) fertilite tedavi durumu ve (iii-) yardımcı üreme teknolojisi (YÜT), tedavisi endikasyonlarına göre üç farklı gruplama sistemi kullanıldı. Bulgular: Tüm grupta ortalama BDI ve HAM-A skorları sırasıyla 39.2 (25-67) ve 22.1 (11-45) idi. Fertilite tedavisi endikasyonlarına göre anket puanlarının değerlendirilmesinde BDI puanları 34,2-44,7 arasında idi ve gruplar arasında istatistiksel anlamlılık yoktu (p: 0,182). HAM-A skorları 18,7-38,0 arasında idi ve gruplar arasında istatistiksel anlamlılık yoktu (p: 0,185). Ayrıca, 2019-nCoV salgını ülkemizde başladığında hastaların YÜT tedavi durumuna göre BDI ve HAM-A için gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark yoktu (sırasıyla p: 0.962 ve 0.423). Sonuçlar: İnfertil hastalar depresyon ve anksiyeteye daha yatkındır ve olası tedavi ertelemelerinin depresyon ve anksiyetelerini artırabileceği unutulmamalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Günakan, E., Tohma, Y. A., Bilgili, G. Ö., Önalan, G., Çok, T., Zeyneloglu, H. B. (2022). Psychological conditions of patients whose infertility treatment was postponed due to the novel coronavirus pandemic lockdown. Acta Medica Alanya, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 289–293. https://ajindex.com/articles/425771

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Keskek SO, Erdogan H. COVID-19: A Current Brief Review. Acta Med Alanya. 2020;4:197–202. doi: 10.30565/medalanya.747238
  2. Dashraath P, Wong JLJ, Lim MXK, Lim LM, Li S, Biswas A et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(6):521-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.03.021
  3. Rasmussen SA, Smulian JC, Lednicky JA, Wen TS, Jamieson DJ. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pregnancy: what obstetricians need to know. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(5):415-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.017
  4. Schwartz DA. An Analysis of 38 Pregnant Women with COVID-19, Their Newborn Infants, and Maternal-Fetal Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: Maternal Coronavirus Infections and Pregnancy Outcomes. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020;144(7):799-805. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0901-SA
  5. Schwartz DA, Graham AL. Potential Maternal and Infant Outcomes from (Wuhan) Coronavirus 2019-nCoV Infecting Pregnant Women: Lessons from SARS, MERS, and Other Human Coronavirus Infections. Viruses. 2020;12(2):194. doi: 10.3390/ v12020194
  6. Yu N, Li W, Kang Q, Xiong Z, Wang S, Lin X, et al. Clinical features and obstetric and neonatal outcomes of pregnant patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective, single-centre, descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(5):559- 64. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30176-6
  7. Edwards MJ, Saunders RD, Shiota K. Effects of heat on embryos and foetuses. Int J Hyperthermia. 2003;19(3):295-324. doi: 10.1080/0265673021000039628
  8. Delen D, Eryarsoy E, Davazdahemami B. No Place Like Home: Cross-National Data Analysis of the Efficacy of Social Distancing During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020;6(2):e19862. doi: 10.2196/19862
  9. Kazandi M, Gunday O, Mermer TK, Erturk N, Ozkınay E. The status of depression and anxiety in infertile Turkish couples. Iran J Reprod Med. 2011;9(2):99-104. PMID: 25587255
  10. Pinar G, Zeyneloglu HB. Quality of life, anxiety and depression in Turkish women prior to receiving assisted reproductive techniques. Int J Fertil Steril. 2012;6(1):1- 12. PMID: 25505505
  11. Ozturk S, Sut HK, Kucuk L. Examination of sexual functions and depressive symptoms among infertile and fertile women. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35(5):1355-60. doi: 10.12669/pjms.35.5.615
  12. Domar AD, Zuttermeister PC, Friedman R. The psychological impact of infertility: a comparison with patients with other medical conditions. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;14 Suppl:45-52. PMID: 8142988
  13. Khademi A, Alleyassin