Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

Pulsatile blood flow during cardiopulmonary bypass does not reduce the release of S100B

Pulsatil akım kardiyopulmoner bypass sonrası S100B protein salınımını azaltmıyor

Pages
211–215
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results indicate that pulsatile blood flow does not have a neuroprotective effect.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: S100B protein has been suggested to be a marker for cerebral injury after cardiac operation and extra-corporeal circulation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to determine the effect of pulsatile blood flow during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on cerebral injury by using S100B as a marker for cerebral injury.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results indicate that pulsatile blood flow does not have a neuroprotective effect.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: S100B protein has been suggested to be a marker for cerebral injury after cardiac operation and extra-corporeal circulation. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of pulsatile blood flow during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on cerebral injury by using S100B as a marker for cerebral injury. Methods: Thirty patients with elective coronary artery bypass grafting were randomized into two groups (Group A pulsatile, and Group B non-pulsatile). In all cases a roller pump with a pulsatile and non-pulsatile mode was used for CPB. Serial blood samples (preoperative, beginning of CPB, before aortic cross clamp release, during skin closure and 6 and 12 hours postoperatively) were collected. The serum was analyzed for S100B using immunoluminometric assay. Results: Both groups were matched for age, number of grafts, and duration of CPB and aortic cross clamping, the time of ventilation and ICU stay. Postoperative levels of S100B were significantly higher in both groups compared to the preoperative levels (p 0.05), there was no significant difference in S100B levels between the groups at any time. Conclusions: Serum levels of S100B increase significantly during CPB. However, pulsatile perfusion does not reduce serum S100B release significantly during CBP compared with non-pulsatile perfusion. These results indicate that pulsatile blood flow does not have a neuroprotective effect.

Özet

Amaç: S100B proteininin kardiyak operasyon ve kardiyopulmoner bypass sonrası görülebilen serebral hasarın bir göstergesi olduğu düşünülmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı serum S100B proteinini kullanarak, kardiyopulmoner bypass sonrasında görülebilen serebral hasara, pulsatil akımlı kardiyopulmoner bypassın etkisini araştırmaktı. Materyal ve Metod: Elektif koroner bypass ameliyatı planlanan 30 hasta randomize olarak iki gruba ayırıldı (Grup A pulsatil akım, Grup B devamlı akım). Bütün hastalarda pulsatil ve devamlı akım sağlayabilen döner başlıklı pompa kullanıldı. Tüm hastalardan ameliyat öncesi, kardiyopulmoner bypass başlangıcında, aort klempi kaldırılmadan, cilt kapatılırken, ameliyat sonrasında 6. ve 12. saatlerde kan örneği alınarak saklandı. Elde edilen serumlardaki S100B seviyesi immunoluminometrik yöntemle ölçüldü. Bulgular: Her iki grup yaş, anastomoz sayısı, kardiyopulmoner bypass ve aort klemp zamanı, ventilasyon zamanı ve yoğun bakımda kalış süreleri açısından karşılaştırıldı. Her iki grupta ameliyat sonrası S100B değerleri ameliyat öncesi değerlere göre önemli ölçüde yükseldi (p 0.05), her iki gruptaki S100B seviyeleri arasındaki fark hiçbir dönemde anlamlı bulunamadı. Sonuç: Kardiyopulmoner bypass sırasında serum S100B değeri anlamlı derecede yükselmektedir. Kardiyopulmoner bypass sırasında uygulanan pulsatil akım devamlı akımla karşılaştırıldığında, pulsatil akımın kardiyopulmoner bypass ve sonrasında S100B salınımma anlamlı etkisi olmadığı görülmüştür. Bu sonuçlar pulsatil akımın serebral hasarı azaltıcı etkisi olmadığını göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSAN, S., CİVELEK, A., İSBİR, S., AKGÜN, S., TEKELİ, A., AKSOY, N., KLÖVEKORN, W. P., ROTH, M. (2022). Pulsatile blood flow during cardiopulmonary bypass does not reduce the release of S100B. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 211–215. https://ajindex.com/articles/425427

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Furlan AJ, Sila CA, Chimowitz MI, Jones SC. Neurologic complications related to cardiac surgery. Neurol Clin 1992;10:145-66
  2. Gardner TJ, Horneffer PJ, Manolio TA, et al. Stroke following coronary artery bypass grafting: A ten year study. Ann Thorac Surg 1985;40:574-81
  3. Roach GW, Kanchuger M, Mangano CM, et al. Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group and the Ischemia Research and Education Foundation Investigators. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1857-63
  4. Hindman BJ, Dexter F, Ryu KH, Smith T, Cutkomp J. Pulsatile versus nonpulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass. No difference in brain blood flow or metabolism at 27 degrees C. Anesthesiology 1994; 80:1137-47
  5. Chow G, Roberts IG, Harris D, et al. Stockert roller pump generated pulsatile flow: Cerebral metabolic changes in adult cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion 1997;12:113-9
  6. Murkin JM, Martzke JS, Buchan AM, Bentley C, Wong CJ. A randomized study of the influence of perfusion technique and pH management strategy in 316 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. II. Neurologic and cognitive outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 110:349-62
  7. Kusch B, Vogt S, SiratAS, Helwig-Rohling A, Kasseckert S, Moosdorf R. Serum S-100 beta protein release in coronary artery bypass grafting: Laminar versus pulsatile flow. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;49:179-83
  8. Westaby S, Johnsson P, Parry AJ, et al. Serum S100 protein: A potential marker for cerebral ev.ents during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:88-92
  9. Astudillo R, Van der Linden J, Radegran K, Hansson LO, Aberg B. Elevated serum levels of S-100 after deep hypothermic arrest correlate with duration of circulatory arrest. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1996;10:1107-12
  10. Taggart DP, Mazel JW, Bhattacharya K, et al. Comparison of serum S-100 beta levels during coronary artery bypass grafting and intracardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:492-6
  11. Blomquist S, Johnsson P, Luhrs C, et al. The appearance of S-100 protein in serum during and immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: A possible marker for cerebral injury. J Cardiothorac Vase Anesth 1997; 11:699-703
  12. Zimrner DB, Cornwall EH, Landar A, Song W. The S100 protein family: History, function, and expression. Brain Res Bull 1995;37:417-29
  13. Hardemark HG, Ericsson N, Kotwica Z, et al. S-100 protein and neuron-specific enolase in CSF after experimental traumatic or focal ischemic brain damage