Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3

Arteriovenous fistula operations: Its early and late-term complicaitons that need to revision

Arteriyovenöz fistül operasyonları: Erken ve geç dönemde revizyon gerektiren komplikasyonlar

Pages
180–183
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Anew strategies can be devoloped in order to maximize primary and secondary fistula patency and to prolong the use of AVFs and to decrease morbidity and mortality of the patients with AVFs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: A patients with chronic renal disaese for haemodialysis require a permanent arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) which has a good long-term patency and a low complication rate.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Twentytwo patients (called as Group 1) who operated from early (first 48 hours) complications of AVFs during the period between january'90 and october'99 in Cardiovasculary Surgery Departments in Pamukkale University and İzmir Atatürk Education and Traning Hospitals was included to this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Anew strategies can be devoloped in order to maximize primary and secondary fistula patency and to prolong the use of AVFs and to decrease morbidity and mortality of the patients with AVFs.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: A patients with chronic renal disaese for haemodialysis require a permanent arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) which has a good long-term patency and a low complication rate. The objective of this study was to determine early and late-term complications of AVFs that need to surgical revision. Methods: Twentytwo patients (called as Group 1) who operated from early (first 48 hours) complications of AVFs during the period between january'90 and october'99 in Cardiovasculary Surgery Departments in Pamukkale University and İzmir Atatürk Education and Traning Hospitals was included to this study. Also, 33 patients (called as Group 2) admitting to our hospital from late-term complications of AVFs that need to surgical revision during the period between september'98 and october'99 was included to this study. Results: Surgical revision was performed in 11 patients (50%) due to thrombosis, in 8 patients (%36.4) due to hemaetom and in 3 patients (13.6%) due to hemorrhage in Group 1. Surgical revision was performed in 26 patients (79%) due to thrombosis, in 2 patients (%6) due to oedema, in 1 patients (3%) due to arterial steal, in 3 patients (9%) due to peudoaneurysm and in 1 patients (3%) due to graft thrombosis and graft infection in Group 2. Conclusions: Fistula thrombosis is the most common complication of AVFs. Anew strategies can be devoloped in order to maximize primary and secondary fistula patency and to prolong the use of AVFs and to decrease morbidity and mortality of the patients with AVFs.

Özet

Amaç: Kronik böbrek hastaları hemodializ işlemi için, düşük komplikasyon oranına sahip ve uzun süre açık kalabilen kalıcı arteriyovenöz (AV) fistüllere gereksinim duyarlar. Bu çalışmada amacımız; AV fistül operasyonları sonrası erken ve geç dönemde cerrahi revizyon gerektiren komplikasyonları belirlemekti. Materyal ve Metod: Çalışmaya, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi ve İzmir Atatürk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Klinikleri'nde Ocak 1990 ve Ekim 1999 yılları arasında arteriyovenöz fistül operasyonu uygulanan ve erken dönem (ilk 48 saat) AV fistül komplikasyonu nedeniyle revizyon uygulanan 22 hasta (Grup 1) ile aynı kliniklere Eylül 1998 ve Ekim 1999 tarihleri arasında AV fistül operasyonlarının geç dönem komplikasyonları ile başvuran ve revizyon uygulan 33 hasta (Grup 2) dahil edildi. Bulgular: Grup l'deki toplam 22 hastanın; ll'inde tromboz (%50), 8'inde hematom (%36.4) ve 3'ünde hemoraji (%13.6) nedeniyle revizyon uygulanırken, Grup 2'deki toplam 33 hastanın; 26'smda fistül trombozu (%79), 2'sinde ödem (%6),sinde arteriyal steal (%3), 3'ünde pseudoanevrizma (%9), sinde greft trombozu (%3) ve greft infeksiyonu (%3) nedeniyle revizyon uygulandı. Sonuç: Arteriyovenöz fistül operasyonları sonrası en sık görülen komplikasyon fistül trombozudur. Kronik böbrek hastalarında, primer ve sekonder fistül açıklığını maksimize edecek stratejiler geliştirilebilir, diyaliz süresi uzatılabilir ve hasta morbiditesi ve mortalitesi azaltılabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

RENDECİ, O., GÖKTOĞAN, T., TULUKOĞLU, E., BALTALARLI, A., ÖNEM, G., GÖKŞİN, İ., SAÇAR, M., KARA, H. (2022). Arteriovenous fistula operations: Its early and late-term complicaitons that need to revision. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3, 180–183. https://ajindex.com/articles/425348

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Murphy GJ, White SA, Nicholson ML. Vascular access for haemodialysis. Br J Surg 2000;87:1300-15
  2. Connall TP, Wilson SE. Vascular access for haemodialysis. In: Rutherford RB,eds. Vascular Surgery, 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 1995:1233-44
  3. Baltalarlı A, Önem G, Gökşin İ, Yılık L. Brescia-Cimino arteriovenöz fistül deneyimlerimiz. Damar Cer Derg 2000;1:28-30
  4. Konner K, Hulbert-Shearon TE, Roys EC, Port FK. Tailoring the initial vascular access for dialysis patients. Kidney Int 2002;62:329-38
  5. Ravichandran R, Rao SM, Bokade CM, Abraham V. Ulnobasilic arteriovenous fistulae for hemodialysis. Dial Transplant 1999;28:314-6
  6. Vogel KM, Martino MA, O’Brien SP, Kerstein MD. Complications of lower extremity arteriovenous grafts in patients with end stage renal disease. South Med J 2000;93:593-5
  7. Lazarides MK, Staramos DN, Panagapoulos GN, Tzilalis VD, Eleftheriou GJ, Dayantas JN, Staamos DN. Indications for surgical treatment of angioaccess induced arterial “steal”. J Am Coll Surg 1998;187:422-6
  8. Utzig MJ, Foitzik Th, Dollinger P, Buhr HJ. Ist die chirurgische revision von ePTFE dialyseshunts gerechtfertigt? [Patency of surgically revised ePTFE dialysis access grafts]. Zentralbl Chir 2002;127:123-7
  9. Meyer F, Müller JS, Bürger T, Halloul Z, Lippert H. Experiences with ambulatory arteriovenous shunt surgery. A cost-benefit analysis. Chirurg 2002;73:274-8
  10. Dikow R, Schwenger V, Zeier M, Ritz E. Do AV fistulas contribute to cardiac mortality in hemodialysis patients? Semin Dial 2002;15:14-7
  11. Astor BC, Coresh J, Powe NR, Eustace JA, Klag MJ. Relation between gender and vascular Access complications in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2000;36:1126-34
  12. Wolowczyk L, Williams AJ, Donovan KL, Gibbons CP. The snuffbox arteriovenous fistula for vascular Access. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000;19:70 6
  13. Kherlakian GM, Roedersheimer LR, Arbaugh JJ, Newmark KJ, King LR. Comparison of autogeneous fistula versus expanded polytetraflouroethylene graft fistula for angioaccess in hemodialysis. Am J Surg 1986;152:238-43
  14. Palder SB, Kirkman RL, Whittemore AD, Hakim RM, Lazarus JM, Tilney NL. Vascular access for hemodialysis. Patency rates and results of revision. Ann Surg 1985;202:235-9
  15. Marston WA, Criado E, Jaques PF, Mauro MA, Burnham SJ, Keagy BA. Prospective randomized comparison of surgical versus endovascular management of thrombosed dialysis access grafts. J Vasc Surg 1997;26:378-81
  16. Jean G, Vanel T, Chazot C, Charra