Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Alternative approach for revascularization of extremities: Extra-anatomic bypass grafting

Ekstremite revaskülarizasyonu için alternatif yaklaşım: Ekstra-anatomik bypass greftleme

Pages
40–46
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: EAB is the method of choice with reasonable mortality/morbidity rate, primary graft patency of 72.2% and patient's survival of 7S.5% in an avarage follow up of 2 years for high risk patient.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: In this study, we aimed to determine an early mortality rate and primary graft patency, patient's survival in an avarage follow-up of 2 years for the patients with extra-anatomic bypass (EAB) grafting.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We reviewed our clinical results retrospectively in total of 14 patients with EAB grafting during the period between June 1Ş95 to June 2001 in our clinic. 13 patients (92.8%) were male and only one patient was female, mean age was 58.4 ± 14 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: EAB is the method of choice with reasonable mortality/morbidity rate, primary graft patency of 72.2% and patient's survival of 7S.5% in an avarage follow up of 2 years for high risk patient.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: In this study, we aimed to determine an early mortality rate and primary graft patency, patient's survival in an avarage follow-up of 2 years for the patients with extra-anatomic bypass (EAB) grafting. Methods: We reviewed our clinical results retrospectively in total of 14 patients with EAB grafting during the period between June 1Ş95 to June 2001 in our clinic. 13 patients (92.8%) were male and only one patient was female, mean age was 58.4 ± 14 years. Axillobifemoral (AFF) bypass in 5 patients axillofemoral (AF) bypass in 2 patients, femoro-femoral (FF) bypass in 4 patients, axilloaxillary (AA) bypass in 2 patients, obturatory bypass (OB) in 1 patient were performed. Results: Early mortality rate was 7.2% with one patient. In etiology, Takayasu's arteritis exists in female patient, atherosclerosis exists in all of the male patients. EAB was performed as primary revascularization in 8 patients, as secondary revascularization in 6 patients. Total of 9 times various vascular interventions before EAB grafting operation were performed due to peripheral arterial occlusive disease in 6 patients." PTCA in -2 patients, CABG in 1 patient, CEA in 1 patient before EAB grafting operation were performed. Obturator bypass was performed due to graft infection in 1 patient with aorto-femoral bypass grafting. During the follow up period, 1 patient due to cerebrovascular event and 1 patient due to cardiac event died. We determined the graft thrombosis in 3 patients with AF, FF and AA bypass grafting. Secondary graft patency was provided through the embolectomy in only 1 patient with occluded graft. Conclusion: EAB is the method of choice with reasonable mortality/morbidity rate, primary graft patency of 72.2% and patient's survival of 7S.5% in an avarage follow up of 2 years for high risk patient.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, ekstra-anatomik bypass (EAB) uygulanan hastalarda erken dönem mortalite oram ve ortalama 2 yıllık izlem döneminde greft açıklığının ve hasta sağkalım oranının tespit edilmesi amaçlandı. Materyal ve Metod: Kliniğimizde, Haziran 1995 - Haziran 2001 tarihleri arasında EAB operasyonu uygulanan toplam 14 hasta retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastaların l'i kadın 13'ü (%92.8) erkekti, ortalama yaş 58.4 ± 14 idi. Beş hastaya aksillo bifemoral (AFF), 2 hastaya aksillo femoral (AF), 4 hastaya femoro-femoral (FF), 2 hastaya aksillo-aksiller (AA), l hastaya obturator bypass (OB) uygulandı. Bulgular: Erken dönem (ilk 30 gün) mortalite l hasta ile %7.2 idi. Kadın hastamızda Takayasu arteriti, erkek hastaların tümünde ise etiyolojide ateroskleroz mevcuttu. Ekstra-anatomik bypass, 8 hastada primer revaskülarizasyon, 6 hastada ise sekonder revaskülarizasyon olarak uygulandı. Sekonder revaskülarizasyon uygulanan 6 hastaya periferik arteriyel hastalık nedeniyle daha önce toplam 9 kez vasküler girişim uygulanmıştı. Ekstra anatomik bypass öncesi 2 hastaya perkutan translüminal koroner anjiyoplasti, l hastaya koroner arter bypass greftleme ve l hastaya da karotis endarterektömisi yapılmıştı. Greft enfeksiyonu nedeniyle, aortofemoral bypass uygulanan l hastada obturator bypass yapıldı. İzlem sırasında l hasta serebrovasküler hadise, l hasta ise kardiyak nedenle kaybedildi. Aksillo-femoral, FF, AA EAB uygulanan l'er hastada greftlerin tıkalı olduğu tespit edilirken, sadece l hastada embolektomi ile sekonder greft açıklığı sağlandı. Sonuç: Ekstra-anatomik bypass, yüksek riskli hastalarda kabul edilebilir bir mortalite, 2 yıllık izlemde %72.2 primer greft açıklığı ve %78.5 hasta sağkalım oranı ile tercih edilebilir bir yöntemdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKŞİN, İ., SUNGURTEKİN, H., GÜRSES, E., ÖZCAN, V., DOĞAN, H., EVRENGÜL, H., BALTALARLI, A., ÖNEM, G. (2022). Alternative approach for revascularization of extremities: Extra-anatomic bypass grafting. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 40–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/425346

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Rutherford RB. Extra-Anatomic Bypass. In: Rutherford RB, Mitchell MB, eds. Vascular surgery. Philadelphia: W.B Sounders Company, 1995:815-27
  2. Mingoli A, Sapienza P, Feldhaus RJ, et al. Long-term results and outcomes of crossover axilloaxillary bypass grafting: A 24 year experience. J Vasc Surg 1999;29:894-901
  3. Erentuğ V, Bozbuğa NU, Ömeroğlu SN ve ark. Ekstra- anatomik bypass girişimleri. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cer Derg 2003;11:42-5
  4. Myers WO, Lawton BR, Sautter RD. Axillo-axillary bypass graft [letter]. JAMA 1971;217:826
  5. Rutherford RB, Patt A, Pearce WH. Extra-anatomic bypass: A closer view. J Vasc Surg 1987;6:437-46
  6. İşcan HZ, Göl MK, Çiçekçioğlu F, Bayazıt M, Taşdemir O, Erdil N. Torakal aortanın ekstra-anatomik bypassda inflow kaynağı olarak kullanımı: Olgu sunumu. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cer Derg 2001;9:118-21
  7. Erdoğan A, Eser İ, Türk T, Gürses U, Demircan A. Prostetik vasküler greft cinsleri ve uzun dönem sonuçları. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cer Derg 2003;11:37-41
  8. El-Massry S, Saad E, Sauvage LR, et al. Axillofemoral bypass with externally supported, knitted dacron grafts: A follow-up through twelve years. J Vasc Surg 1993;17:107- 14
  9. Rutherford RB, Baue AE. Extra-Anatomic Bypass. In: Rutherford RB, ed. Vascular surgery. Philadelphia: W.B Sounders Company, 1989:705-16
  10. Eugene J, Goldstone J, Moore WS. Fifteen year experience with subcutaneous bypass grafts for lower extremity ischemia. Ann Surg 1977;186:177-83
  11. Ascer E, Veith FJ, Gupta SK, et al. Comparison of axillounifemoral and axillobifemoral bypass opertaions. Surgery 1984;97:169-74
  12. Donaldson MC, Louras JC, Bucknam CA. Axillofemoral bypass: A tool a limited role. J Vasc Surg 1986;5:757-63
  13. Schultz GA, Savuage LR, Mathisen SR, et al. A 5 to 7 year experience with externally-supported Dacron prostheses in axillofemoral and femoropopliteal bypass. Ann Vasc Surg 1986;1:214-24
  14. Harris EJ, Taylor LM, McConnell DB, Moneta Gl, Yeager RA, Porter JM. Clinical results of axillobifemoral bypass using externally supported polytetrafluorethylene. J Vasc Surg 1990;12:416-21
  15. Blaisdel FW. Extra-anatomic bypass procedures. Word J Surg 1988;12:798-804
  16. Johnson WC. Axillofemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease. In: Ernst C, Stanley J, eds. Current therapy in vascular surgery. Philadelphia: BC Decker, 1991:416-20
  17. Criado E, Burnham SJ, Tinsley EA Jr, Johnson G Jr, Keagy B. Femoro-femoral bypass grafts: Analysis of patency and factors influencing long-te