Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4

Diagnostic mediastinoscopy: analysis of 30 patients

Tanısal mediastinoskopi: 30 olgunun analizi

Pages
295–298
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Background: Thirty patients with mediastinal lesions which could not be diagnosed with other diagnostic techniques, have been retrospectively rewieved in order to retrospectively evaluate the results of diagnosis objected mediastinoscopy.Methods: Thirty patients (23 males, 7 females; mean age 45.3 years; range 20 to 65 years) with mediastinal mass underwent diagnostic mediastinoscopy under general anesthesia by the same surgical team by standard cervical approach, between May 2003 and July 2005.Results: According to the histopathological examination, 14 patients (46.6%) had sarcoidosis, 7 patients (23.3%) had reactive lymph node hyperplasia, 5 patients (16.6%) had tuberculotic lymphadenitis, and 4 patients (13.3%) had metastatic lymph node hyperplasia due to lung cancer-N2.Conclusion: Our results support the view that mediastinoscopy is a useful method in patients with mediastinal mass which could not be diagnosed with less invasive diagnostic techniques.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Thirty patients with mediastinal lesions which could not be diagnosed with other diagnostic techniques, have been retrospectively rewieved in order to retrospectively evaluate the results of diagnosis objected mediastinoscopy.Methods: Thirty patients (23 males, 7 females; mean age 45.3 years; range 20 to 65 years) with mediastinal mass underwent diagnostic mediastinoscopy under general anesthesia by the same surgical team by standard cervical approach, between May 2003 and July 2005.Results: According to the histopathological examination, 14 patients (46.6%) had sarcoidosis, 7 patients (23.3%) had reactive lymph node hyperplasia, 5 patients (16.6%) had tuberculotic lymphadenitis, and 4 patients (13.3%) had metastatic lymph node hyperplasia due to lung cancer-N2.Conclusion: Our results support the view that mediastinoscopy is a useful method in patients with mediastinal mass which could not be diagnosed with less invasive diagnostic techniques.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Background: Thirty patients with mediastinal lesions which could not be diagnosed with other diagnostic techniques, have been retrospectively rewieved in order to retrospectively evaluate the results of diagnosis objected mediastinoscopy.Methods: Thirty patients (23 males, 7 females; mean age 45.3 years; range 20 to 65 years) with mediastinal mass underwent diagnostic mediastinoscopy under general anesthesia by the same surgical team by standard cervical approach, between May 2003 and July 2005.Results: According to the histopathological examination, 14 patients (46.6%) had sarcoidosis, 7 patients (23.3%) had reactive lymph node hyperplasia, 5 patients (16.6%) had tuberculotic lymphadenitis, and 4 patients (13.3%) had metastatic lymph node hyperplasia due to lung cancer-N2.Conclusion: Our results support the view that mediastinoscopy is a useful method in patients with mediastinal mass which could not be diagnosed with less invasive diagnostic techniques.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Background: Thirty patients with mediastinal lesions which could not be diagnosed with other diagnostic techniques, have been retrospectively rewieved in order to retrospectively evaluate the results of diagnosis objected mediastinoscopy.Methods: Thirty patients (23 males, 7 females; mean age 45.3 years; range 20 to 65 years) with mediastinal mass underwent diagnostic mediastinoscopy under general anesthesia by the same surgical team by standard cervical approach, between May 2003 and July 2005.Results: According to the histopathological examination, 14 patients (46.6%) had sarcoidosis, 7 patients (23.3%) had reactive lymph node hyperplasia, 5 patients (16.6%) had tuberculotic lymphadenitis, and 4 patients (13.3%) had metastatic lymph node hyperplasia due to lung cancer-N2.Conclusion: Our results support the view that mediastinoscopy is a useful method in patients with mediastinal mass which could not be diagnosed with less invasive diagnostic techniques.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: Thirty patients with mediastinal lesions which could not be diagnosed with other diagnostic techniques, have been retrospectively rewieved in order to retrospectively evaluate the results of diagnosis objected mediastinoscopy.Methods: Thirty patients (23 males, 7 females; mean age 45.3 years; range 20 to 65 years) with mediastinal mass underwent diagnostic mediastinoscopy under general anesthesia by the same surgical team by standard cervical approach, between May 2003 and July 2005.Results: According to the histopathological examination, 14 patients (46.6%) had sarcoidosis, 7 patients (23.3%) had reactive lymph node hyperplasia, 5 patients (16.6%) had tuberculotic lymphadenitis, and 4 patients (13.3%) had metastatic lymph node hyperplasia due to lung cancer-N2.Conclusion: Our results support the view that mediastinoscopy is a useful method in patients with mediastinal mass which could not be diagnosed with less invasive diagnostic techniques.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, diğer tanısal yöntemlerle adlandırılamayan mediastinal lezyonlu otuz olguda uygulanan tanısal amaçlı mediastinoskopik girişim retrospektif olarak incelendi.Çalışma planı: Mayıs 2003 - Temmuz 2005 tarihleri arasında mediastinal kitle tanısıyla 30 hastaya (23 erkek, 7 kadın; yaş ort. 45.3; dağılım 20-65) genel anestezi altında, standart servikal yaklaşımla, aynı cerrahi ekip tarafından mediastinoskopi uygulandı.Bulgular: Histopatolojik incelemede, 14 olguda (%46.6) sarkoidoz, yedi olguda reaktif lenf nodu hiperplazisi (%23.3), beş olguda (%16.8) tüberküloz lenfadenit, dört olguda (%13.3) metastatik lenf nodu (akciğer kanseri-N2) saptandı.Sonuç: Bulgularımız, daha az invaziv yöntemlerle tanısı konulamayan mediastinal lezyonlarda mediastinoskopinin etkili bir yöntem olduğu yönündeki görüşleri desteklemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜRKÇÜOĞLU, İ. C., KURUL, İ. C., DEMİRCAN, İ., YORGANCILAR, C. D. (2022). Diagnostic mediastinoscopy: analysis of 30 patients. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4, 295–298. https://ajindex.com/articles/425230

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Tucker JA. Mediastinoscopy: 300 cases reported and literature reviewed. Laryngoscope 1972;82:2226-48
  2. Kürkçüoğlu C, Eroğlu A, Kaynaş A. Tanısal mediyastinoskopi. University of Ondokuz Mayıs Journal of Medicine 2001; 18:168-171
  3. Jolly PC, Hill LD 3rd, Lawless PA, West TL. Parasternal mediastinotomy and mediastinoscopy. Adjuncts in the diagnosis of chest disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1973; 66:549-56
  4. Ponn RB. Invasive diagnostic procedures. In: Shields TW, LoCicero IIIJ, Ponn RB, Rusch VW, editors. General thoracic surgery. Vol. 1. 6th ed. Philedelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005. p. 299-308
  5. Ginsberg RJ, Rice TW, Goldberg M, Waters PF, Schmocker BJ. Extended cervical mediastinoscopy. A single staging procedure for bronchogenic carcinoma of the left upper lobe. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1987;94:673-8
  6. Hutter J, Junger W, Miller K, Moritz E. Subxiphoidal videomediastinoscopy for diagnostic access to the anterior mediastinum. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:1427-8
  7. Davis RD, Oldham HN, Sabiston DC. The mediastinum. In: Sabiston DC, Spencer FC, editors. Surgery of the chest. 5th ed. Philadelphia: W. B Saunders Company; 1990. p. 498-535
  8. Azarow KS, Pearl RH, Zurcher R, Edwards FH, Cohen AJ. Primary mediastinal masses. A comparison of adult and pediatric populations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:67-72
  9. Bocage JP, Mackenzie JW, Nosher JL. Invasive diagnostic procedures. In Shields TW, LoCicero J, Ponn RB. General Thoracic Surgery. Vol 1. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000. p. 273-48
  10. Toker A, Kalaycı G. Akciğer kanserinde mediastinoskopinin rolü. Toraks Dergisi 2001;2:72-76
  11. Glazer GM, Gross BH, Quint LE, Francis IR, Bookstein FL, Orringer MB. Normal mediastinal lymph nodes: number and size according to American Thoracic Society mapping. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985;144:261-5
  12. Specht G. Discussion by carlens. In: Jepsen O, Sorensen HR, editors. Mediastinoscopy. Denmark: Odensa University Press; 1971. p. 130-4
  13. Morrissey B, Adams H, Gibbs AR, Crane MD. Percutaneous needle biopsy of the mediastinum: review of 94 procedures. Thorax 1993;48:632-7
  14. Weisbrod GL, Lyons DJ, Tao LC, Chamberlain DW. Percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy of mediastinal lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984;143:525-9
  15. Vallieres E, Page A, Verdant A. Ambulatory mediastinoscopy and anterior ediastinotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1991;52:1122-6
  16. Ferguson MK, Lee E, Skinner DB, Little AG. Selective operative approach for diagnosi